William Eichler 19 August 2024

Questions raised over Brum’s decision to issue s114

Questions raised over Brum’s decision to issue s114  image
Image: Juan Garcia Hinojosa / Shutterstock.com

An academic report has raised questions about the reliability of Birmingham City Council’s £760m equal pay liability figure and called for an investigation into the decision to issue a section 114.

The Audit Reform Lab (ARL), a collective of academics who investigate auditors, argue that the council’s financial problems were mostly the result of austerity and the ‘disastrous implementation’ of a new Oracle IT system.

The report, which was co-commissioned by the trade unions UNISON, Unite and GMB, claims that the decision to declare effective bankruptcy was initially attributed to a £760m equal pay liability which was ‘speculative and unaudited’.

Auditors Grant Thornton said the ARL’s report contained ‘inaccurate and misleading’ information.

The auditor said that it was inaccurate to attribute the council’s financial problems solely or even predominantly to the troubled roll out of Oracle, adding that service pressures and equal pay claims ‘play a greater part in the council’s financial issues.’

Referring to the £760m equal pay liability figure, Grant Thornton’s statement said: ‘Both officers and commissioners have confirmed that this is the best estimate available of the council’s liability on the available information.’ The statement added that the audit work is ‘ongoing’.

Responding to the auditor’s criticisms, Dr James Brackley from ARL said: ‘We circulated our report with all interested parties and took considerable care to ensure factual accuracy throughout the report. This included a lengthy discussion with Grant Thornton about our findings.

‘It is our view that the objections raised by Grant Thornton relate to points of interpretation not fact and we can see nothing in their comment to the press that contradicts any of the points made in our report.’

Check out: The financial crisis in Birmingham City Council.

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Street Cleansing Operative - Uttlesford District Council

Essex County Council
Up to £12.5900 per hour
Grounds Maintenance & Street Cleansing OperativeTemporary Contract*37 Hours per Week (Monday-Friday, 7-3)£12.59 per hour PAYEImmediate StartClosing Da England, Essex
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Supported Lodgings Officer

Durham County Council
Grade 9 - £35,412 - £39,152 (pre-progression) / Grade 11 - £40,777 - £45,091 (post-progression)
Are you passionate about the real difference supported lodgings carers can make to the lives of children and young people in our care?   Are you an ex Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Lunchtime Supervisors

Durham County Council
£24,796 pro rata
2x Lunchtime Supervisors Required as soon as possible Grade 1    £24,796 pro rata Permanent We are seeking to appoint two Lunchtime Supervisors to jo Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Enhanced Teaching Assistant

Durham County Council
£28,142 - £31,022 pro rata
Part-time Enhanced Teaching Assistant  Grade 6 £28,142 - £31,022 pro rata 15 hours per week, term time only plus 2 weeks Permanent Required from 3rd N Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Enhanced Teaching Assistant

Durham County Council
£28,142 - £31,022 pro rata
Enhanced Teaching Assistant Grade 6 £28,142 - £31,022 pro rata Permanent Full time, term time only + 2 weeks Required as soon as possible The Woodlan Ferryhill
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner