William Eichler 19 August 2024

Questions raised over Brum’s decision to issue s114

Questions raised over Brum’s decision to issue s114  image
Image: Juan Garcia Hinojosa / Shutterstock.com

An academic report has raised questions about the reliability of Birmingham City Council’s £760m equal pay liability figure and called for an investigation into the decision to issue a section 114.

The Audit Reform Lab (ARL), a collective of academics who investigate auditors, argue that the council’s financial problems were mostly the result of austerity and the ‘disastrous implementation’ of a new Oracle IT system.

The report, which was co-commissioned by the trade unions UNISON, Unite and GMB, claims that the decision to declare effective bankruptcy was initially attributed to a £760m equal pay liability which was ‘speculative and unaudited’.

Auditors Grant Thornton said the ARL’s report contained ‘inaccurate and misleading’ information.

The auditor said that it was inaccurate to attribute the council’s financial problems solely or even predominantly to the troubled roll out of Oracle, adding that service pressures and equal pay claims ‘play a greater part in the council’s financial issues.’

Referring to the £760m equal pay liability figure, Grant Thornton’s statement said: ‘Both officers and commissioners have confirmed that this is the best estimate available of the council’s liability on the available information.’ The statement added that the audit work is ‘ongoing’.

Responding to the auditor’s criticisms, Dr James Brackley from ARL said: ‘We circulated our report with all interested parties and took considerable care to ensure factual accuracy throughout the report. This included a lengthy discussion with Grant Thornton about our findings.

‘It is our view that the objections raised by Grant Thornton relate to points of interpretation not fact and we can see nothing in their comment to the press that contradicts any of the points made in our report.’

Check out: The financial crisis in Birmingham City Council.

What’s happening inside the LGPS? image

What’s happening inside the LGPS?

Get the most informed take on the challenges and opportunities that substantial reform will bring at this year’s PLSA Local Authority Conference.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Portage Worker - SEND and Inclusion

Durham County Council
Grade 8 £31,586 - £35,235
Term-time only (plus one week) – Temporary for 18 months Term-time only (plus one week) – Temporary for 12 months   We are recruiting Portage Workers Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Social Worker

Durham County Council
£34,314 - £37,938 (pre-progression) / £39,513 - £43,693 (post-progression)
We are looking for social workers who have completed their assessed and supported year in employment to join our Families First Service. WHAT IS INVO Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Receptionist

Durham County Council
£24,404 to £25,183 pro rata p.a. Grade 3 (£12.64 to £13.05 per hour)
Casual as and when required opportunity is available Spennymoor Leisure Centre. WHAT IS INVOLVED? In this role you will professionally welcome custom Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Lunchtime Supervisory Assistant

Durham County Council
£24,027 pro rata
2x Lunchtime Supervisory Assistant Vacancies Would you like to work with a group of wonderful children in order to help them to have a happy and sett Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Enhanced Teaching Assistant

Durham County Council
£25,584 - £27,711?pro rata
Enhanced Teaching Assistant Grade 5     £25,584 - £27,711?pro rata Full time, Term Time Only + 2 Weeks Temporary – required from 1st September 2025 un Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner