William Eichler 07 August 2025

IFS: Fair Funding reforms set to create big ‘winners’ and ‘losers’

IFS: Fair Funding reforms set to create big ‘winners’ and ‘losers’  image
© jd8 / Shutterstock.com.

Inner London is set to be the biggest loser ‘by far’ from the Government’s proposed Fair Funding reforms, a study by the Institute for Fiscal Studies has calculated.

A new report by financial experts at the think tank found that the proposed reforms to the local government funding system would create big ‘winners’ and ‘losers’.

Fairer Funding for London?

Camden, Hammersmith & Fulham, Kensington & Chelsea, Wandsworth and Westminster will be hit the hardest and can expect their overall funding to be 11–12% lower in real terms in 2028–29 than this year, according to the IFS.

Outer London will do much better with several boroughs, such as Enfield, Havering and Hillingdon, being among the biggest beneficiaries of the reforms. They could see overall funding increase by around 20% in real terms over the next three years.

Impact of Funding Reforms Outside of London

Outside the capital, councils in the East Midlands are likely to see the biggest real-terms increases in overall funding over the next three years (15% in real terms), followed by Yorkshire & the Humber (12%).

Local authorities in the South East are set to see the smallest real-terms increases (7%), on average.

Fair Funding for Deprived Areas?

The IFS’ research also found that increases in funding for councils covering the most deprived 30% of areas are set to be similar over the next three years, on average, to those in the middle 40% of areas.

In contrast, rural areas, which feared losing from the reforms, may fare better than expected. The average change in funding for the least densely populated 10% of council areas is set to be in line with the national average over the next three years.

Commentary

Kate Ogden, a senior research economist at IFS and an author of the report, said England had lacked a ‘rational system of local government funding’ for up to two decades and so the proposed reforms were ‘welcome’.

‘But the changes will sting for those councils that are assessed to currently receive too high a share of the overall funding pot, and so which lose out from moves to align funding with assessed spending needs,’ she added.

For more on Fair Funding check out the following by The MJ (£): Fears fair funding could trigger section 114 notices

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Head of Operations & Business Development - Amphora Colchester

Essex County Council
Up to £60000.0000 per annum
Head of Operations & Business Development - Amphora Colchester Colchester AmphoraSalary
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Technical Assistant

Essex County Council
Up to £25959.0000 per annum
Technical AssistantPermanent, Full Time£25,959 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Assistant Director of Culture, Growth and Infrastructure

City of York Council
£86,537 – £95,898 plus benefits and relocation support
This is a new, pivotal and exciting opportunity for an inspiring leader to help shape York's future prosperity... West Offices York (minimum 3 days per week) / Hybrid working
Recuriter: City of York Council

Adults Social Worker - Early Help & Wellbeing (South Essex)

Essex County Council
£36124 - £51834 per annum + Flexible Working, Hybrid Working
This advert is open to Experienced and Newly Qualified Social Worker's (NQSW) with relevant experience in Mental Health. The starting salary for a NQ England, Essex, Basildon
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Part-Time Business Support Administrator

Essex County Council
£25959.00 - £28786.00 per annum + Full Time Equivalent
Part-Time Business Support AdministratorFixed Term, Part Time£25,959 - £28,786 Per Annum (Full Time Equivalent) Location
Recuriter: Essex County Council
Linkedin Banner