William Eichler 07 August 2025

IFS: Fair Funding reforms set to create big ‘winners’ and ‘losers’

IFS: Fair Funding reforms set to create big ‘winners’ and ‘losers’  image
© jd8 / Shutterstock.com.

Inner London is set to be the biggest loser ‘by far’ from the Government’s proposed Fair Funding reforms, a study by the Institute for Fiscal Studies has calculated.

A new report by financial experts at the think tank found that the proposed reforms to the local government funding system would create big ‘winners’ and ‘losers’.

Fairer Funding for London?

Camden, Hammersmith & Fulham, Kensington & Chelsea, Wandsworth and Westminster will be hit the hardest and can expect their overall funding to be 11–12% lower in real terms in 2028–29 than this year, according to the IFS.

Outer London will do much better with several boroughs, such as Enfield, Havering and Hillingdon, being among the biggest beneficiaries of the reforms. They could see overall funding increase by around 20% in real terms over the next three years.

Impact of Funding Reforms Outside of London

Outside the capital, councils in the East Midlands are likely to see the biggest real-terms increases in overall funding over the next three years (15% in real terms), followed by Yorkshire & the Humber (12%).

Local authorities in the South East are set to see the smallest real-terms increases (7%), on average.

Fair Funding for Deprived Areas?

The IFS’ research also found that increases in funding for councils covering the most deprived 30% of areas are set to be similar over the next three years, on average, to those in the middle 40% of areas.

In contrast, rural areas, which feared losing from the reforms, may fare better than expected. The average change in funding for the least densely populated 10% of council areas is set to be in line with the national average over the next three years.

Commentary

Kate Ogden, a senior research economist at IFS and an author of the report, said England had lacked a ‘rational system of local government funding’ for up to two decades and so the proposed reforms were ‘welcome’.

‘But the changes will sting for those councils that are assessed to currently receive too high a share of the overall funding pot, and so which lose out from moves to align funding with assessed spending needs,’ she added.

For more on Fair Funding check out the following by The MJ (£): Fears fair funding could trigger section 114 notices

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Executive Director of Place and Customer

Essex County Council
up to £179,404 per annum
Shape the Future of Essex. Drive climate action. Deliver for our communities. Essex
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Director of Social Work and Social Care

Trafford Council
£100,731 to £104,625
You will join a values-driven senior leadership team, providing visible and responsive leadership. Manchester
Recuriter: Trafford Council

Housing Ombudsman

Housing Ombudsman Service
£130,095 per annum, negotiable based on experience.
The Housing Ombudsman Service allows colleagues to choose if they wish to work in the London office, from home or a hybrid of the two London (Greater)
Recuriter: Housing Ombudsman Service

Lead Commissioning Officer

Essex County Council
£42452 - £49943 per annum + Flexible Working, Hybrid Working
This is a fixed term contract or secondment opportunity for up to 12 months.Interviews will be held on 3rd March 2026.*Experience the best of both wo England, Essex, Chelmsford
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Specialist Tutor - Employability/Well-Being

Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council
Band E SCP 18-25 (£31,537 - £36,363 per annum)
Sandwell Adult and Family Learning Service has an exciting opportunity for 2 full-time specialist tutors Sandwell, West Midlands
Recuriter: Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council
Linkedin Banner