Dan Peters 03 July 2020

Councils in local virus data call

Councils have called for the Government to go further after it finally started to publish more coronavirus testing data.

Chairman of the Local Government Association’s (LGA) community wellbeing board, Cllr Ian Hudspeth, said the new data failed to give councils the information they needed to specifically identify where in their area outbreaks were occurring.

He said councils also wanted improvements to the individual case data that public health officials have started to receive, including the data for all tests and more information about workplaces.

Leader of the LGA’s Labour group, Nick Forbes, tweeted that the current data failed to include negative test results and often the postcode was of the test centre or patient’s doctor rather than their home, which he said ‘renders it useless’.

England’s first local lockdown started in Leicester earlier this week after increasing levels of infection were reported in the city.

Data from Leicester showed case numbers rising from Wednesday June 17 but detailed postcode-level information from so-called pillar two community tests was slow to reach frustrated local leaders.

Local authorities had warned since early May that the results of hundreds of thousands of these  tests were not being shared with them, leaving councils with ‘no idea’ where disease clusters were located.

The MJ understands that local resilience forums told the Government weeks ago that without this data it would be ‘impossible to identify local outbreaks’.

Local government secretary Robert Jenrick said Leicester was a reminder that there was ‘no room for complacency’.

He said the Government would ‘learn the lessons from Leicester’ and ensure that local areas received the ‘right data at the right times’.

Cllr Hudspeth said: ‘The most important thing is that the public and those working on the frontline get a complete picture of the impact this virus has had in our neighbourhoods and in our communities, regardless of how the data is collected and where it is processed.

'This will help councils to work with their communities, to manage potential outbreaks and prevent the spread of infection.’

The £37,000 SEND Problem image

The £37,000 SEND Problem

Natalie Kenneison, COO at Imosphere, argues that the real SEND funding crisis isn’t just about budgets - it’s about the systems behind the decisions.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Portage Worker - SEND and Inclusion

Durham County Council
Grade 8 £31,586 - £35,235
Term-time only (plus one week) – Temporary for 18 months Term-time only (plus one week) – Temporary for 12 months   We are recruiting Portage Workers Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Social Worker

Durham County Council
£34,314 - £37,938 (pre-progression) / £39,513 - £43,693 (post-progression)
We are looking for social workers who have completed their assessed and supported year in employment to join our Families First Service. WHAT IS INVO Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Receptionist

Durham County Council
£24,404 to £25,183 pro rata p.a. Grade 3 (£12.64 to £13.05 per hour)
Casual as and when required opportunity is available Spennymoor Leisure Centre. WHAT IS INVOLVED? In this role you will professionally welcome custom Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Lunchtime Supervisory Assistant

Durham County Council
£24,027 pro rata
2x Lunchtime Supervisory Assistant Vacancies Would you like to work with a group of wonderful children in order to help them to have a happy and sett Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Enhanced Teaching Assistant

Durham County Council
£25,584 - £27,711?pro rata
Enhanced Teaching Assistant Grade 5     £25,584 - £27,711?pro rata Full time, Term Time Only + 2 Weeks Temporary – required from 1st September 2025 un Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner