William Eichler 03 December 2019

Party commitments on council funding ‘starkly’ different, think tank says

The money allocated to local government in the Conservative manifesto would not be enough to meet rising costs and demands over the next parliament, think tank says.

The Institute for Fiscal Studies have analysed what the manifestos of the main political parties – Conservatives, Labour, and Liberal Democrats – mean for local authority funding.

They concluded that Tory funding commitments would not cover the increasing costs and demands expected at the local level, even if council tax were increased by 4% a year.

A study of English local government funding from the IFS last month found that budgeted revenues to cover day-to-day spending in 2019–20 will be approximately 18% lower in real-terms than in 2009–10. This equates to cuts of 24% per resident once population growth is taken into consideration.

The study also found that these cuts have varied ‘significantly’ across the country.

Councils’ spending on local services has fallen around 31% in the most deprived areas, according to the IFS, compared to 16% in the least deprived areas.

Labour has allocated ‘more than enough’ money to meet rising costs and demands, according to the IFS’ associate director and author of the analysis, David Phillips, allowing increases in service provision and quality.

However, Labour’s funding commitments would not restore local government funding to 2010 levels.

The Liberal Democrats have allocated enough money to meet rising costs and demands if council tax is increased by 2% a year. This would, however, require some of the funding earmarked for bus services, youth services or homelessness to be used to meet these pressures.

‘Taken together, the differences between what the parties propose for local government funding are stark. This reflects manifestos that more generally set out vastly different futures for the country,’ concluded Mr Phillips.

‘But all three main parties have unfunded commitments on adult social care spending – suggesting this will be an important and potentially problematic issue whoever forms the next Government.’

Skills Pipelines: What local government needs to know image

Skills Pipelines: What local government needs to know

Councils and mayors are to be handed a central role in developing skills pipelines for local industries, as the Government unveils what it calls a ‘fundamental change’ to the education system aimed at tackling youth unemployment. Here's what council leaders and officers need to know.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Category Specialist

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£43545 - £51228 Depending on Skills, Knowledge a
Job Title-Category Specialist<... London, Wandsworth, United Kingdom
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Stores Assistant

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
Salary From £32,841-£39,796 Depending on Skills
Job Title-Stores Assistant... Wandsworth, London, United Kingdom
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Adult Skills Coordinator

Middlesbrough Council
£39,152 - £40,777
We have an exciting role on offer within our Community Learning service as an Adult Skills Coordinator. Middlesbrough, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: Middlesbrough Council

Fleet & Workshop Manager (Transport Manager)

Fenland District Council
£46,142 - £51,356
Keep Fenland Moving Cambridgeshire
Recuriter: Fenland District Council

Specialist Autism Teacher

Royal Borough of Greenwich
Teachers Main Professional Scale
Make a Difference for Children and Young People in Greenwich Greenwich, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Royal Borough of Greenwich
Linkedin Banner