Laura Sharman 10 June 2016

Hampshire councils fall out over 'underperforming' accusations

Councils in Hampshire have exchanged heated words, following disagreements on how best to change the structure of local government in the county.

Portsmouth and Southampton City Councils and some of the districts have backed plans to create a combined authority for the Solent area. However, Hampshire County Council said independent research shows a new unitary authority would be a better way of saving money and protecting public services.

In the latest dispute, the leaders of Portsmouth and Southampton City Councils have hit out after the leader of Hampshire County Council, cllr Roy Perry, said new responsibilities shouldn't be given to an underperforming area.

The two councils dismiss this claim, saying the latest economic figures show the strength of the area. The councils highlight the fact the Portsmouth area placed ninth for the value of goods and services produced per worker in the latest Centre for Cities report, while Southampton was fourth place in the Demos/PwC Good Growth Index.

‘It is ridiculous for Roy Perry to claim the south of Hampshire is underperforming,’ said Portsmouth City Council leader, cllr Donna Jones.

‘The county's record of achievement managing services in the south of Hampshire is no better or worse than that of Portsmouth and Southampton, and our schools compare favourably to those run by the county.’

Leader of Southampton City Council, cllr Simon Letts, added: 'The Government has recognised the Solent region as a viable economic area and seen the potential it has to grow even more. It would be nice if the county could support us in getting the best outcomes for residents and businesses rather than looking out for its own interests.'

Cllr Perry stands by his assertion that southern Hampshire has higher unemployment and higher levels of deprivation than the rest of Hampshire. ‘If in making this point too forcefully I have offended anyone, then of course I apologise – I was not in any way criticising councils or residents in south Hampshire, who all work hard to raise the prosperity of the area,’ he said.

‘However, if we are to address the problems faced by residents I think we have to face up to the reality that on many measures the south Hampshire economy is not performing as well as other areas. Access to jobs and markets, transport connections and the skills of the local workforce all need to be improved.

‘No one local authority can influence all these areas, and it requires a holistic approach by not only the county council, but every other council in the area as well as the Government. This is why I remain a staunch advocate of working together, keeping Hampshire whole. Together we can achieve so much more.’

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Centre Assistant

Wakefield Council
£16,336.22 - £16,594.38, Grade 3, 24 hours, Permanent
We are looking for an enthusiastic individual to work in our Wakefield Families Together Youth and Community Centre Wakefield, West Yorkshire
Recuriter: Wakefield Council

SEND Development Officer

North Yorkshire Council
£47,181 to £51,356 per annum
We are looking for a motivated and experienced SEND Development Officer to join our Education and Inclusion service Northallerton, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: North Yorkshire Council

RCHW Site Operative

Essex County Council
Up to £25081.00 per annum
RCHW Site OperativePermanent, Part Time£25,081 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Operations Delivery Manager (Waste Implementation)

Essex County Council
Up to £22.0000 per hour
Operations Delivery Manager (Waste Implementation) - Braintree District Council Braintree, Essex Full-Time, Temporary - 37 Hours per Week 4 Months Con England, Essex, Braintree
Recuriter: Essex County Council

SEND Tribunal Liaison Officer

North Yorkshire Council
£38,220 to £42,839 per annum, pro rata
This is a specialist professional role within the SEND Service (0–25) Northallerton, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: North Yorkshire Council
Linkedin Banner