William Eichler 01 December 2016

Council urged to accept Ombudsman's decision on care contribution

The Local Government Ombudsman (LGO) has urged a council to reconsider its refusal to fund a disabled man’s care.

St Helens Council refused to provide or fund home care services for a man who suffered a road traffic accident, despite an assessment concluding he had ‘critical needs’.

Social workers delayed completing a care plan for him and failed to complete a financial assessment to determine what contribution the man should pay towards his care.

The council argued the man should have used his substantial damages claim of £2,850,000 to fund his care, and stated funding the care would amount to ‘double recovery’.

An LGO investigation concluded the man should not have to use a personal injury settlement to fund litigation against a public authority.

It also found the council at fault for not completing a care plan or financial assessment after the initial assessment was carried out, and for failing to pass on a copy of the care plan completed following the second assessment.

St Helens Council has considered the Ombudsman’s findings and decided not to accept them.

LGO Dr Jane Martin said: ‘My report in July stated the legal position in this case was clear, and my position has not changed since then.

‘I would not expect this vulnerable man to have to use his personal injury award to take legal proceedings against St Helens Council.

‘I would urge the council to reconsider its response to my report and provide the remedy I have recommended.’

A St Helens Council spokesman said: ‘The council has previously given serious consideration to the points made by the Local Government Ombudsman in this sensitive matter.

‘In particular, the council has considered the relevant case law, but has found itself in disagreement with the conclusions which the Ombudsman has reached in applying relevant case law to the facts of the complaint.’

The spokesperson said the council had a duty to use its ‘scarce resources’ carefully and is of the view that ‘Mr A’s personal injury award of £2,850,000 is sufficient to fund his care.’

The council spokesman did note they would consider the LGO’s report in a ‘fair and balanced way’ before responding.

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Senior CIL and S106 Officer

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
Salary From £42,081-£57,837 Depending on skills,
Job Title-Senior CIL and S106 ... Wandsworth, London, United Kingdom
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

CIL S106 Officer

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
Salary From £38,841- £48,789 Depending on skills
Job Title- CIL and S106 Office... Wandsworth, London, United Kingdom
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Adults Social Worker - South Essex (Expression of Interest)

Essex County Council
£36124 - £51834 per annum + Flexible Working, Hybrid
Register your interest here to be notified of upcoming Social Worker opportunities within Essex County Council's Adult Social Care services in South England, Essex, Basildon
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Multimedia Officer (Digital)

Durham County Council
Grade 9 £35,412 - £39,152 (pro rata)
An opportunity has arisen for a part-time Multimedia Officer (Digital) in the Communications, Marketing and Design team.   This part-time role is for Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Duty Manager (WET)

Durham County Council
£31,015 - £34,811
We have an opportunity for a full-time permanent Duty Manager at Chester le Street  Leisure Centre.  WHAT IS INVOLVED? You will be responsible for th Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner