William Eichler 01 December 2016

Council urged to accept Ombudsman's decision on care contribution

The Local Government Ombudsman (LGO) has urged a council to reconsider its refusal to fund a disabled man’s care.

St Helens Council refused to provide or fund home care services for a man who suffered a road traffic accident, despite an assessment concluding he had ‘critical needs’.

Social workers delayed completing a care plan for him and failed to complete a financial assessment to determine what contribution the man should pay towards his care.

The council argued the man should have used his substantial damages claim of £2,850,000 to fund his care, and stated funding the care would amount to ‘double recovery’.

An LGO investigation concluded the man should not have to use a personal injury settlement to fund litigation against a public authority.

It also found the council at fault for not completing a care plan or financial assessment after the initial assessment was carried out, and for failing to pass on a copy of the care plan completed following the second assessment.

St Helens Council has considered the Ombudsman’s findings and decided not to accept them.

LGO Dr Jane Martin said: ‘My report in July stated the legal position in this case was clear, and my position has not changed since then.

‘I would not expect this vulnerable man to have to use his personal injury award to take legal proceedings against St Helens Council.

‘I would urge the council to reconsider its response to my report and provide the remedy I have recommended.’

A St Helens Council spokesman said: ‘The council has previously given serious consideration to the points made by the Local Government Ombudsman in this sensitive matter.

‘In particular, the council has considered the relevant case law, but has found itself in disagreement with the conclusions which the Ombudsman has reached in applying relevant case law to the facts of the complaint.’

The spokesperson said the council had a duty to use its ‘scarce resources’ carefully and is of the view that ‘Mr A’s personal injury award of £2,850,000 is sufficient to fund his care.’

The council spokesman did note they would consider the LGO’s report in a ‘fair and balanced way’ before responding.

Designing for cohesion image

Designing for cohesion

Tom Fairey, Development Director at Alliance Leisure, discusses how community spaces can strengthen local connections.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Cleaner

Durham County Council
£24,796 (Pro Rata)
Permanent Contract - Part Time 10 hours per week 4.00pm to 6.00pm Monday to Friday. Whole Time. Required to start 1st August 2026.   Governors wish to Newton Aycliffe
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Social Worker MHSOP

Durham County Council
£35,412 - £39,152 / £40,777- £45,091 p.a. ( pro rata for part-time) i.e. grade 9 pre progression/grade 11 post progression (Pay Award Pending)
We are looking for a MHSOP Social Worker to join our Adult Care Service, supporting older people and adults with a physical disability.   WHAT IS INVO Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Clerical Officer Receptionist

Durham County Council
Grade 3 £25,185 - £25,989 Pro rata (Pay award pending)
WHAT IS INVOLVED? We are looking to appoint a temporary (18 months) part time Clerical Officer/Receptionist within Business Services to provide a pr Newton Aycliffe
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Technical Assistant

Durham County Council
Grade 4
Durham County Council
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Learning Delivery Assistant

Durham County Council
Grade 7
Durham County Council
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner