William Eichler 01 December 2016

Council urged to accept Ombudsman's decision on care contribution

The Local Government Ombudsman (LGO) has urged a council to reconsider its refusal to fund a disabled man’s care.

St Helens Council refused to provide or fund home care services for a man who suffered a road traffic accident, despite an assessment concluding he had ‘critical needs’.

Social workers delayed completing a care plan for him and failed to complete a financial assessment to determine what contribution the man should pay towards his care.

The council argued the man should have used his substantial damages claim of £2,850,000 to fund his care, and stated funding the care would amount to ‘double recovery’.

An LGO investigation concluded the man should not have to use a personal injury settlement to fund litigation against a public authority.

It also found the council at fault for not completing a care plan or financial assessment after the initial assessment was carried out, and for failing to pass on a copy of the care plan completed following the second assessment.

St Helens Council has considered the Ombudsman’s findings and decided not to accept them.

LGO Dr Jane Martin said: ‘My report in July stated the legal position in this case was clear, and my position has not changed since then.

‘I would not expect this vulnerable man to have to use his personal injury award to take legal proceedings against St Helens Council.

‘I would urge the council to reconsider its response to my report and provide the remedy I have recommended.’

A St Helens Council spokesman said: ‘The council has previously given serious consideration to the points made by the Local Government Ombudsman in this sensitive matter.

‘In particular, the council has considered the relevant case law, but has found itself in disagreement with the conclusions which the Ombudsman has reached in applying relevant case law to the facts of the complaint.’

The spokesperson said the council had a duty to use its ‘scarce resources’ carefully and is of the view that ‘Mr A’s personal injury award of £2,850,000 is sufficient to fund his care.’

The council spokesman did note they would consider the LGO’s report in a ‘fair and balanced way’ before responding.

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Technical and Support Officers

Durham County Council
£30,024 to £33,699 p.a. (Grade 7) Pay Award pending
Do you have a passion for improving services, solving problems and making the most of technology?  If so, we want to hear from you! We're seeking two Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Technician

Durham County Council
Grade 6 £28,142 - £31,022 (Pay award pending)
WHAT IS INVOLVED?    Are you passionate about live events, theatre, and bringing unforgettable experiences to life? We're looking for a Technician to Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Welfare Rights Officers

Durham County Council
£35,412 to £39,152 p.a. (Grade 9) Pay Award pending
An exciting opportunity has arisen within Durham County Council for two Welfare Rights Officers, on a two-year fixed term basis. WHAT IS INVOLVED? Th Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Waste Recycling Non HGV Driver Chargehand

Durham County Council
Grade 6 £28,142 - £31,022 per annum (Pay award pending)
Are you an experienced driver with strong leadership skills? We’re looking for a Non-HGV Driver Chargehand to join our Waste and Recycling team. In t Peterlee
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Senior Instructor - Essex Outdoors

Essex County Council
£26840.0000 - £31576.0000 per annum
Senior Instructor - Essex Outdoors Mersea and Essex Outdoors HarlowPermanent, Full Time£26,840 to £31,576 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council
Linkedin Banner