William Eichler 01 December 2016

Council urged to accept Ombudsman's decision on care contribution

The Local Government Ombudsman (LGO) has urged a council to reconsider its refusal to fund a disabled man’s care.

St Helens Council refused to provide or fund home care services for a man who suffered a road traffic accident, despite an assessment concluding he had ‘critical needs’.

Social workers delayed completing a care plan for him and failed to complete a financial assessment to determine what contribution the man should pay towards his care.

The council argued the man should have used his substantial damages claim of £2,850,000 to fund his care, and stated funding the care would amount to ‘double recovery’.

An LGO investigation concluded the man should not have to use a personal injury settlement to fund litigation against a public authority.

It also found the council at fault for not completing a care plan or financial assessment after the initial assessment was carried out, and for failing to pass on a copy of the care plan completed following the second assessment.

St Helens Council has considered the Ombudsman’s findings and decided not to accept them.

LGO Dr Jane Martin said: ‘My report in July stated the legal position in this case was clear, and my position has not changed since then.

‘I would not expect this vulnerable man to have to use his personal injury award to take legal proceedings against St Helens Council.

‘I would urge the council to reconsider its response to my report and provide the remedy I have recommended.’

A St Helens Council spokesman said: ‘The council has previously given serious consideration to the points made by the Local Government Ombudsman in this sensitive matter.

‘In particular, the council has considered the relevant case law, but has found itself in disagreement with the conclusions which the Ombudsman has reached in applying relevant case law to the facts of the complaint.’

The spokesperson said the council had a duty to use its ‘scarce resources’ carefully and is of the view that ‘Mr A’s personal injury award of £2,850,000 is sufficient to fund his care.’

The council spokesman did note they would consider the LGO’s report in a ‘fair and balanced way’ before responding.

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Educational Psychologist (EP)

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£53,238 - £64,512 per annum
Educational Psychologist (EP)£53,2... Wandsworth, London
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

HMO ASB OFFICER

Royal Borough of Greenwich
PO1 - £41,113 to £43,680
We are looking for three HMO Anti-Social Behaviour Officers to join our Private Housing London (Greater)
Recuriter: Royal Borough of Greenwich

South-East London Fostering Hub Programme Manager

Royal Borough of Greenwich
PO6 (£54,267 - £57,402)
The role will provide strong programme management oversight, ensuring projects are well planned, effectively delivered a London (Greater)
Recuriter: Royal Borough of Greenwich

Professional Educator (Part Time, 28 hours)

Royal Borough of Greenwich
PO6 - £54,267 to £57,402
We are looking for an experienced and enthusiastic Professional Educator to join our Quality Assurance and Workforce development Service. London (Greater)
Recuriter: Royal Borough of Greenwich

Principal Lawyer Litigation and Housing

Kirklees Metropolitan Council
£53,051 to £58,258
You will join a team of experienced Lawyers, Legal Officers, and Paralegals supported by a dedicated Business Support Team. Huddersfield, West Yorkshire
Recuriter: Kirklees Metropolitan Council
Linkedin Banner