William Eichler 01 December 2016

Council urged to accept Ombudsman's decision on care contribution

The Local Government Ombudsman (LGO) has urged a council to reconsider its refusal to fund a disabled man’s care.

St Helens Council refused to provide or fund home care services for a man who suffered a road traffic accident, despite an assessment concluding he had ‘critical needs’.

Social workers delayed completing a care plan for him and failed to complete a financial assessment to determine what contribution the man should pay towards his care.

The council argued the man should have used his substantial damages claim of £2,850,000 to fund his care, and stated funding the care would amount to ‘double recovery’.

An LGO investigation concluded the man should not have to use a personal injury settlement to fund litigation against a public authority.

It also found the council at fault for not completing a care plan or financial assessment after the initial assessment was carried out, and for failing to pass on a copy of the care plan completed following the second assessment.

St Helens Council has considered the Ombudsman’s findings and decided not to accept them.

LGO Dr Jane Martin said: ‘My report in July stated the legal position in this case was clear, and my position has not changed since then.

‘I would not expect this vulnerable man to have to use his personal injury award to take legal proceedings against St Helens Council.

‘I would urge the council to reconsider its response to my report and provide the remedy I have recommended.’

A St Helens Council spokesman said: ‘The council has previously given serious consideration to the points made by the Local Government Ombudsman in this sensitive matter.

‘In particular, the council has considered the relevant case law, but has found itself in disagreement with the conclusions which the Ombudsman has reached in applying relevant case law to the facts of the complaint.’

The spokesperson said the council had a duty to use its ‘scarce resources’ carefully and is of the view that ‘Mr A’s personal injury award of £2,850,000 is sufficient to fund his care.’

The council spokesman did note they would consider the LGO’s report in a ‘fair and balanced way’ before responding.

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Education Navigator - Integrated Front Door

Cheshire East Council
£43,149 - £49,658 per annum
Are you passionate about making a positive difference to the lives of children, young people and families? Macclesfield, Cheshire
Recuriter: Cheshire East Council

Executive Director of Finance and Assets (Section 151 Officer)

West Surrey Council
£161,239–£177,363
You will also lead a more strategic approach to West Surrey’s assets, income and commercial activity. West Surrey
Recuriter: West Surrey Council

Technical & Validation Officer

Ashfield District Council
£29,542 - £32,046 per annum
We have an opportunity available for a Technical & Validation Officer Kirkby-in-Ashfield, Nottingham
Recuriter: Ashfield District Council

Environmental Services Operative (Driver)

Ashfield District Council
£27,274 - £29,071 per annum
Where applicable the skills, qualifications and memberships required for this job have also been included. Sutton-In-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire
Recuriter: Ashfield District Council

Environment Area Supervisor

Ashfield District Council
£33,119 - £35,570 per annum
We are seeking an experienced, forward-thinking and highly motivated operational team leader Sutton-In-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire
Recuriter: Ashfield District Council
Linkedin Banner