William Eichler 01 December 2016

Council urged to accept Ombudsman's decision on care contribution

The Local Government Ombudsman (LGO) has urged a council to reconsider its refusal to fund a disabled man’s care.

St Helens Council refused to provide or fund home care services for a man who suffered a road traffic accident, despite an assessment concluding he had ‘critical needs’.

Social workers delayed completing a care plan for him and failed to complete a financial assessment to determine what contribution the man should pay towards his care.

The council argued the man should have used his substantial damages claim of £2,850,000 to fund his care, and stated funding the care would amount to ‘double recovery’.

An LGO investigation concluded the man should not have to use a personal injury settlement to fund litigation against a public authority.

It also found the council at fault for not completing a care plan or financial assessment after the initial assessment was carried out, and for failing to pass on a copy of the care plan completed following the second assessment.

St Helens Council has considered the Ombudsman’s findings and decided not to accept them.

LGO Dr Jane Martin said: ‘My report in July stated the legal position in this case was clear, and my position has not changed since then.

‘I would not expect this vulnerable man to have to use his personal injury award to take legal proceedings against St Helens Council.

‘I would urge the council to reconsider its response to my report and provide the remedy I have recommended.’

A St Helens Council spokesman said: ‘The council has previously given serious consideration to the points made by the Local Government Ombudsman in this sensitive matter.

‘In particular, the council has considered the relevant case law, but has found itself in disagreement with the conclusions which the Ombudsman has reached in applying relevant case law to the facts of the complaint.’

The spokesperson said the council had a duty to use its ‘scarce resources’ carefully and is of the view that ‘Mr A’s personal injury award of £2,850,000 is sufficient to fund his care.’

The council spokesman did note they would consider the LGO’s report in a ‘fair and balanced way’ before responding.

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Harbour Operative

North Yorkshire Council
£25,614 - £26,847 Per annum
As our Harbour Operative, you will play a key role in promoting the harbour to both visiting and local vessels. Whitby, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: North Yorkshire Council

Bridge Operative

North Yorkshire Council
£26,847 - £28,153 pro rata per
The role has a three-week rota which allows for variety and rotation of weekend working, with additional payments for night and weekend work. Whitby, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: North Yorkshire Council

D1 Licensed Minibus Driver

North Yorkshire Council
£25,614 - £26,847 pro rata per annum
If you love working with people and naturally look out for others, you’re exactly who we’re looking for. Selby, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: North Yorkshire Council

School Crossing Patrol

North Yorkshire Council
£13.28 - £13.92 per hour
We are currently looking for a dedicated School Crossing Patrol officer in Great Ayton who wants to make a real difference to their local community. Easingwold, York
Recuriter: North Yorkshire Council

Principal Lawyer Litigation and Housing

Kirklees Metropolitan Council
£53,051 to £58,258
We are looking for an enthusiastic, hardworking Lawyer to take on a leadership role within our Litigation and Housing Team. Huddersfield, West Yorkshire
Recuriter: Kirklees Metropolitan Council
Linkedin Banner