William Eichler 01 December 2016

Council urged to accept Ombudsman's decision on care contribution

The Local Government Ombudsman (LGO) has urged a council to reconsider its refusal to fund a disabled man’s care.

St Helens Council refused to provide or fund home care services for a man who suffered a road traffic accident, despite an assessment concluding he had ‘critical needs’.

Social workers delayed completing a care plan for him and failed to complete a financial assessment to determine what contribution the man should pay towards his care.

The council argued the man should have used his substantial damages claim of £2,850,000 to fund his care, and stated funding the care would amount to ‘double recovery’.

An LGO investigation concluded the man should not have to use a personal injury settlement to fund litigation against a public authority.

It also found the council at fault for not completing a care plan or financial assessment after the initial assessment was carried out, and for failing to pass on a copy of the care plan completed following the second assessment.

St Helens Council has considered the Ombudsman’s findings and decided not to accept them.

LGO Dr Jane Martin said: ‘My report in July stated the legal position in this case was clear, and my position has not changed since then.

‘I would not expect this vulnerable man to have to use his personal injury award to take legal proceedings against St Helens Council.

‘I would urge the council to reconsider its response to my report and provide the remedy I have recommended.’

A St Helens Council spokesman said: ‘The council has previously given serious consideration to the points made by the Local Government Ombudsman in this sensitive matter.

‘In particular, the council has considered the relevant case law, but has found itself in disagreement with the conclusions which the Ombudsman has reached in applying relevant case law to the facts of the complaint.’

The spokesperson said the council had a duty to use its ‘scarce resources’ carefully and is of the view that ‘Mr A’s personal injury award of £2,850,000 is sufficient to fund his care.’

The council spokesman did note they would consider the LGO’s report in a ‘fair and balanced way’ before responding.

Designing for cohesion image

Designing for cohesion

Tom Fairey, Development Director at Alliance Leisure, discusses how community spaces can strengthen local connections.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Assistant Finance and Business Development Manager

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£38,976 - £49,365 per annum
Job Title
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Senior Occupational Health Advisor

Durham County Council
£44,075 to £48,226 p.a. (Grade 12) pay award pending
Due to increased service demand we have an exciting opportunity for an additional Senior Occupational Health Nurse to join our well-established in-hou Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Social Worker

Durham County Council
£35,412 - £39,152 / £40,777- £45,091 pro rata i.e. grade 9 pre progression/grade 11 post progression
We seek a full-time, permanent Social Worker who is calm under pressure and passionate about improving the lives of service users. WHAT IS INVOLVED? Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Young Person's Advisor

Durham County Council
Grade 8 - £32,597 - £36,363
X1 Young Person’s Advisor – Full-Time (Temporary for 12 months) An exciting opportunity has become available within the Unaccompanied Asylum-Seeking Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Sufficiency Support Officer

Durham County Council
£28,142 - £31,022
Do you want your work to make a real difference to the lives of children and young people in our care?   This is a brilliant opportunity to join a new Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner