Mark Whitehead 11 November 2014

Better Care Fund plans branded 'a shambles' by MPs

Plans to save money by merging health and social care have been blasted as 'a shambles' after it was revealed they have delivered less than a third of the £1bn originally estimated.

Chair of the Public Accounts Committee, Margaret Hodge, said she was 'dismayed' by delays and changes to the Better Care Fund, which had weakened its credibility with local bodies.

The fund, set to be launched next April, aims to deliver more joined-up local services to older and disabled people to care for them in the community.

Although the Government said it would save the NHS £1bn in 2015-16, current plans forecast just £314m of savings.

The Government paused and redesigned the scheme in April when they realised it would not meet their expectations.

Amyas Morse, head of the National Audit Office, said: 'The Better Care Fund is an innovative idea but the quality of early preparation and planning did not match the scale of the ambition.

'The £1bn financial savings assumption was ignored, the early programme management was inadequate, and the changes to the programme design undermined the timely delivery of local plans and local government's confidence in the fund's value.'

He said government departments should give more effective support to local areas, improve joint working between health bodies and local government, and provide better evidence on effectiveness.

Ms Hodge said: 'Successful delivery depends on goodwill and joint commitment but delays and changes to the fund’s design have weakened its credibility with local bodies and lost goodwill.

'It is deeply disturbing that local government believes the changes to targets and how the fund will be run move the integration agenda backward and not forward.'

She added: 'The Better Care Fund is a complex and challenging initiative that clearly requires strong leadership and effective cross government working, both of which have been lacking.

'It is hard to believe that until recently there was no central management team or programme director and there were only limited attempts to identify and manage risks to successful delivery.

'Such incompetence from departments is unacceptable at a time when the number of people most likely to need care is rising, and overall funding is falling.'

She said her committee would 'robustly question' officials on plans for the fund next month.

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

RCHW Site Operative

Essex County Council
Up to £25081.00 per annum
RCHW Site OperativePermanent, Part Time£25,081 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Cleaner

Durham County Council
£24,796 (Pro rata)
Cleaner Grade 1, £24,796 (Pro rata) Permanent, part time. 12.5 hours per week Currently 3.30pm to 6pm Monday to Friday (subject to change depending on Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Outreach Support Assistant

Durham County Council
£32,597 - £36,363
Outreach Support Assistant x 6 Grade 8, £32,597 - £36,363 Permanent, full time. Required to start ASAP.   We are seeking to appoint to the Secondary O Ferryhill
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Tenant Support

Durham County Council
Grade 2 - £24,796 - £25,185 (pro-rata)
If you have elderly friends and relatives, you will understand the value they place on independence. This role will give you the opportunity to work Consett
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Home Care and Support Worker

Durham County Council
Grade 4 - £25,583 - £26,824 (pro-rata)
We currently have multiple vacancies available including permament part time and a casual role. If you have elderly friends and relatives, you will u Consett
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner