Sam Clayden 29 April 2016

Whitehall should be 'embarrassed' by PAC report

Whitehall should be ‘embarrassed’ by the findings of a public accounts committee (PAC) report into the extension of right to buy, according to the committee’s chair.

The report, published today, claimed the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) had presented Parliament with little information on the potential impacts of the legislation.  

It said it was ‘not clear how this policy will be funded in practice or what its financial impacts might be’.

PAC chair Meg Hillier said the department had merely offered ‘vague assurances about what it will accomplish and how’.

She said the Government’s approach to paying for the policy was ‘entirely speculative’ and there were ‘no costings or workings out’. 

Ms Hiller said: ‘We are not talking about back of the envelope calculations – there is no envelope at all.

‘Similarly scant regard appears to have been paid to the practical impact on social housing tenants, the long-term knock-on costs of the loss of social housing and the potential change in the mix of housing types.

‘We can form our own views about the Government’s motives for this but Parliament and the public are being asked to take a leap of faith about how this will stack up financially, and that is completely unacceptable.’

The committee called on the DCLG to publish a full analysis to ‘show how the policy is to be funded, provide a clear statement of where financial and other risks lie, and spell out its contingency plan if its policies prove not to be fiscally neutral’.

A DCLG spokesman said: 'This government is delivering on its commitment  to give more people the chance to become homeowners.

'Our voluntary agreement with housing associations will mean 1.3m tenants will have the chance to own their own home while every home sold will be replaced with a new affordable property.'

'We have always been clear we will set out further information as part of this process and regulations defining higher value will be subject to Parliamentary scrutiny,' they added.

For more visit The MJ (£).

Skills Pipelines: What local government needs to know image

Skills Pipelines: What local government needs to know

Councils and mayors are to be handed a central role in developing skills pipelines for local industries, as the Government unveils what it calls a ‘fundamental change’ to the education system aimed at tackling youth unemployment. Here's what council leaders and officers need to know.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

SEND Participation Engagement Officer

The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council
£40,404
You’ll also represent young people’s perspectives at service level meetings and champion robust safeguarding practices London (Greater)
Recuriter: The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council

Social Worker, Young People with Disabilities (16 - 25)

Essex County Council
£36124.0000 - £51834.0000 per annum
Social Worker, Young People with Disabilities (16 - 25) mid TeamPermanent, Full Time£36,124.00 to £51,834.00 Per Annum Location
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Head of Housing Management

Redbridge London Borough Council
£89,037 to £92,538
You’ll enhance our emphasis on quality assurance and getting things ‘right first time’ – making better use of technology in our approach London (Greater)
Recuriter: Redbridge London Borough Council

Head of Local Taxation

Redbridge London Borough Council
£79,119 - £82,368
This is a key leadership role in the Council, with responsibility for the effective and efficient collection of business rates and council tax London (Greater)
Recuriter: Redbridge London Borough Council

School Crossing Patrol Officer - Vacancies across Essex

Essex County Council
Up to £13.46 per hour
School Crossing Patrol Officer - Vacancies across EssexPermanent, Term Time£13.46 per hourLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council
Linkedin Banner