Heather Jameson 01 November 2018

Single unitary council for Bucks gets the go-ahead

Single unitary council for Bucks gets the go-ahead image

Buckinghamshire’s five councils are to be scrapped in favour of a single county-wide unitary, communities secretary James Brokenshire has announced.

The five councils - Aylesbury Vale, Chiltern, South Bucks and Wycombe – will cease to exist on 1 April 2020, with elections in May of that year, assuming Parliament approves the plans.

Buckinghamshire leader Cllr Martin Tett said it was a ‘truly historic day for Buckinghamshire’ and the new unitary would combine the best of both the county and the districts.

‘This new council will be simpler, better value and more local to our residents. It will also have more clout to face head-on the great strategic challenges facing the county over the coming decades,’ he said.

After the ‘robust debate’ over structures of the last couple of years, he called on colleagues to ‘put the past behind us and work together, to build the better future Buckinghamshire’s residents deserve’.

The announcement was made by Mr Brokenshire in a written ministerial statement today, but the debate was kicked off under his predecessor, Sajid Javid. While all the councils agreed reorganisation was needed, two rival bids were put forward.

In the statement, Mr Brokenshire said:’I have concluded that whilst both proposals meet the criterion for a “good deal of local support”, only the proposal for a single unitary council satisfies the criteria for “improving local government” and for “being a credible geography” and that in any event the proposal for a single unitary council is better able to meet the criteria overall.’

https://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers-statements/written-statement/Commons/2018-11-01/HCWS1058/ 

Mr Brokenshire also referenced the ‘sunset clause’ in the Cities and Local Government Devolution Act 2016, which is currently being used to reorganise local government, but expires in March 2019.

He stated: ‘In future, any proposal considered under the Cities and Local Government Devolution Act process will require unanimous consent from all councils. Alternatively, I may issue a formal invitation for proposals, and the specific circumstances in which I would do so will be set out in due course.’

In a joint statement, the district councils said they were ‘disappointed’ and claimed they did not believe broad consensus had been reached.

‘All four district councils, as well as many key stakeholders, firmly believe that the two unitary authority approach, based on the two different economic geographies in Buckinghamshire, is the best option for protecting, delivering and transforming the services needed both now and in the future,’ they said.

‘We will now be considering our position, seeking further advice and reviewing the options available to us.’

District Council Network chairman John Fuller described the decision as ‘the consequence of ill-conceived legislation.’

‘We welcome the clarity of the Secretary of State's confirmation that there will be no new proposals under this legislation and that in future reorganisation proposals will require 100 per cent support of those councils affected,’ he said.

He called on local authorities to focus on the issue of funding, rather that ‘a further distracting round of reorganisation debates.’

The County Councils’ Network director, Simon Edwards, described the announcement as a ‘bold decision’ which he said was right for Buckinghamshire which would ‘allow them to better adapt to the significant challenges facing councils’.

‘Reorganisation is not something all counties wish to pursue but where it is, independent research for CCN has shown there are significant financial, economic, and public service reform benefits for those willing to pursue restructuring at scale,’ he added.

Automatic planning image

Automatic planning

The new reforms mean local authorities need to mobilise, but is this what’s really required? Paul Beaney reports.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Social Worker - SGO & Connected Person Assessment Team

Essex County Council
Negotiable
Social Worker - Special Guardianship Order (SGO) & Connected Person Assessment Team Chelmsford £30,906 - £42,254 Salary scale according to skills a England, Essex, Chelmsford
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Refuse Driver (LGV Chargehand Driver)

Royal Borough of Greenwich
£22995 - £24258 per annum + plus contractual overtime and allowances
It is an exciting time in Waste and Street Services at the Royal Borough of Greenwich. This is a opportunity to be part of a busy, successful team mak England, London, Greenwich
Recuriter: Royal Borough of Greenwich

Management Information Assistant

Brent Council
£24,462 - £26,724 p.a. inc (pro rata)
The successful candidate will have knowledge of relevant systems and software used in Finance and Human Resources. Wembley, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Brent Council

Principal Traffic Signal and ITS Engineer

Warwickshire County Council
£40,876.00 - £42,821.00 plus annual standby allowance of £2,562.84
You will be responsible for the day-to-day operation and maintenance of our Urban Traffic Management and Control System. Warwickshire
Recuriter: Warwickshire County Council

Finance Business Partner (GR7)

Birmingham City Council
£57,698 - £74,887
A role of this scale calls for an experienced Finance Business Partner with tried and tested skills. Birmingham, West Midlands
Recuriter: Birmingham City Council

Public Property

Latest issue - Public Property News

This issue of Public Property examines how how flexible workspaces can lead the way in regeneration for local authorities, Why local authority intervention is key to successful urban regeneration schemes and if the Government’s challenge of embracing beauty is an opportunity for communities.

The March issue also takes a closer look at Blackburn with Darwen Council's first digital health hub to help people gain control over health and care services.

Register for your free digital issue