William Eichler 19 November 2020

Ombudsman tells council to review its housing allocations policy

East Lindsay District Council has agreed to review its housing allocations policy to ensure it meets its equality duties following an investigation by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman.

The investigation was launched after a couple complained that they had been barred from joining the housing register because they did not have a connection to the area. This was despite wanting to provide care to an elderly relative who lived there.

The Ombudsman found the council’s policy did not meet the requirements of the Public Sector Equality Duty. This is because the policy does not consider the needs of people with disabilities when excluding caregivers from qualifying for a local connection.

‘While councils have some freedom to decide the criteria on who qualifies for their housing register, they must also act in line with legal requirements in the Housing Act 1996, and cannot disqualify whole groups of people who would otherwise have priority,’ said Ombudsman Michael King.

‘In this case the problems I have found meant the couple missed the opportunity to have their application considered properly. And because there is a high number of older people living in the district, this may have also unfairly affected other people too.

‘I am pleased the council has agreed to examine its policy in light of my findings and reconsider the couple’s application.’

Responding to the Ombudsman’s findings, the assistant director for housing and wellbeing at East Lindsay District Council, Michelle Howard, confirmed the council was ‘reviewing and amending’ its Housing Allocations Policy.

She continued: ‘We have a high demand for properties in the area and the policy provides the framework for how the allocations are made, including the prioritisation to those most in need.

‘We have apologised to the complainant and have committed to reassess their housing register application in line with the revised policy. We are also contacting any other applicants impacted by the policy position to invite them to request a reassessment of their application.’

The £37,000 SEND Problem image

The £37,000 SEND Problem

Natalie Kenneison, COO at Imosphere, argues that the real SEND funding crisis isn’t just about budgets - it’s about the systems behind the decisions.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Highly Specialist Clinical Psychologist

Oxfordshire County Council
£62215 - £72293
How about joining The Clinical Team at Oxfordshire County Council in our new Community Family Clinic initiative? Oxford
Recuriter: Oxfordshire County Council

Traffic Management Officer - WMF2114e

Westmorland and Furness Council
£37,035 - £37,938
Are you an experienced and motivated professional looking to take the next step in your traffic management career? Cumbria / Various
Recuriter: Westmorland and Furness Council

Peripatetic Support Assistant

Wakefield Council
£16,415.00 - £16,675.23 Grade 4, 24.5 hours, Permanent
Are you caring, compassionate, and friendly? Wakefield, West Yorkshire
Recuriter: Wakefield Council

Peripatetic Support Assistant

Wakefield Council
£14,070.00 - £14,293.05 Grade 4, 21 hours, Permanent
Are you caring, compassionate, and friendly? Wakefield, West Yorkshire
Recuriter: Wakefield Council

Recruitment Support Officer

Durham County Council
£25,584 to £27,711 p.a. (Grade 5) pay award pending
We are looking for a Recruitment Support Officer to join our team on a temporary basis until 31 March 2026. In this role, you will provide a comprehe Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner