William Eichler 20 December 2016

No ‘evidence’ Troubled Families programme works, MPs say

No ‘evidence’ Troubled Families programme works, MPs say image

The Government has ‘overstated’ the effectiveness of the program designed to deal with disadvantaged families and has been ‘evasive’ in its dealings with MPs, committee report says.

The Troubled Families programme was established in 2012 by the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) with the aim of ‘turning around’ the lives of 120,000 disadvantaged families.

The Government argued that by helping these families they could reduce the financial burden they placed on public services.

However, the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has published a report today which accuses Whitehall of overstating the programme’s success through the use of terminology and its method for estimating financial savings.

The DCLG considered families to be 'turned around' on the basis of short-term outcomes rather than ‘long-term, sustainable change in families' lives’, the PAC found. The committee also reported the Government’s claim the programme had saved £1.2bn was an ‘overstatement’.

An official evaluation of the programme was ‘unable to find consistent evidence’ it had any significant impact, the committee concluded.

The PAC report also chastised the Government for delaying the publication of the programme’s phase one evaluation, which was commissioned to assess the programme's impact, cost-effectiveness and implementation, and being ‘evasive’ in explaining why.

‘The Department was evasive when explaining the reasons for this delay, furthering the impression that Government is reluctant to be open and transparent about the Troubled Families programme,’ it said.

The DCLG should also review its use of a 'payment by results' framework for the programme, the committee urged. It ‘led to some councils attempting to move families through the programme quickly, potentially at the expense of reduced quality of support.’

‘Government officials might be inclined to consider our comments on the delay in publishing its Troubled Families evaluation as a slap on the wrist about Whitehall bureaucracy,’ said Meg Hillier MP, chair of the PAC.

‘Let me assure them that given the ambitions for this programme, the implications for families and the significant sums of money invested, it is far more serious than that.’

‘The Department has now committed to providing Parliament with an annual report on progress with the Troubled Families programme, starting in March next year,’ Ms Hillier continued.

‘For this to be meaningful Government must be far clearer about the benefits that can be directly attributed to the public investment in it.

‘Only then can Parliament and others properly assess the value for money of this programme and its merits as a model to bring about lasting change in the lives of those families it is intended to support.’

Senior civil servants defended the programme last October, telling the PAC there had been improvements in 116,000 families but it was difficult to prove ‘beyond statistical doubt’ that success could be ascribed to the programme.

A Government spokesman said: 'As the PAC report recognises, the Troubled Families programme enabled local authorities to expand and transform the way local services work with families.

'But of course, there will always be lessons to learn and we have already made significant improvements to the second stage of the programme.

'We will look carefully at the evidence to find out how we can improve the programme further to help some of the most vulnerable people in our society.'

Will First Homes address local need? image

Will First Homes address local need?

As a new form of affordable housing, First Homes, is set to come into effect from 28 June 2021, Matt Hare considers how will it impact on future development.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Principal Clinical/Counselling Psychologist

Essex County Council
Negotiable
Principal Clinical/Counselling PsychologistPermanent, Part Time£51,510 to £55,000 per annum (Pro Rata)The Divisional Based Intervention Team (D-BIT) a England, Essex, Chelmsford
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Assistant Director of Housing

Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council
£90,205 per annum      
This is an excellent time to work within Rotherham. We are passionate about the place and the people who live, work and visit here. Rotherham, South Yorkshire
Recuriter: Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council

Joint Assistant Director – Commissioning and Performance

Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council
£90,205
As the Assistant Director, you will be passionate about achieving excellent performance and determined to... Rotherham, South Yorkshire
Recuriter: Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council

Social Workers - Family Support and Protection - North Essex

Essex County Council
Negotiable
Social Workers and Senior Practitioners- Family Support and Protection - North EssexPermanent, Full Time£32,065 to £49,183 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

School Attendance Lead

The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council
£44,370 - £50,964 per annum
This is a multi-layered role, in which you'll both be a trusted advisor, and you will be representative of the legal need for... Kensington and Chelsea, London (Greater)
Recuriter: The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council

Public Property

Latest issue - Public Property News

This issue of Public Property examines how how flexible workspaces can lead the way in regeneration for local authorities, Why local authority intervention is key to successful urban regeneration schemes and if the Government’s challenge of embracing beauty is an opportunity for communities.

The March issue also takes a closer look at Blackburn with Darwen Council's first digital health hub to help people gain control over health and care services.

Register for your free digital issue