William Eichler 21 February 2017

Health service reforms ‘not credible’ without social care investment

Health service reforms ‘not credible’ without social care investment  image

Local plans to reform health services to secure the future of the NHS are ‘not credible’ unless cuts in social care and public health budgets are reversed, think tank says.

A new analysis of sustainability and transformation plans (STPs) published by The King’s Fund has argued STPs offer the best hope of delivering reforms to NHS services.

However, it said the Government must back the reforms with the necessary funds and help to develop them into ‘credible plans’ focused on the most important priorities in each area.

STPs are proposals on how to improve health and care systems at the local level, developed jointly in 44 areas by the NHS and local councils.

The report, entitled Delivering sustainability and transformation plans, found all plans aimed to deliver more services in the community, including by putting GPs at the heart of networks bringing together primary care, community services and social care.

It also discovered some plans included proposals to reduce the number of hospitals, cut hospital beds and centralise some services on fewer sites. Greater emphasis was also placed on prevention and efficiency.

The King’s Fund said that while these proposals present an opportunity to ‘move care closer to home’ and moderate demand for hospital services, they are ‘not credible’ without more investment in local services and greater integration of out-of-hospital care.

'It is not credible for the Government to argue that it has backed the NHS’s own plan unless it is prepared to support changes to services outlined in STPs,’ said the think tank’s chief executive Chris Ham.

‘Local plans must be considered on their merits, but where a convincing case for change has been made, ministers and local politicians should back NHS leaders in implementing essential and often long-overdue changes to services.

‘A huge effort is needed to make up lost ground by engaging with staff, patients and the public to explain the case for change and the benefits that will be delivered.'

The Local Government Association (LGA) welcomed the think tank’s calls for better funding for social care and health budgets.

Responding to Delivering sustainability and transformation plans, chairman of the LGA's community wellbeing board, Cllr Izzi Seccombe, said: ‘We back the King's Fund in warning over the cuts to councils' social care and public health budgets, and share the concerns over how we can provide care in the community, improve prevention services, and keep people out of hospital.

‘Councils see STPs as an important vehicle in redesigning local care and health services to improve health and wellbeing, and the quality of care.

‘But we will be unable to achieve this without genuinely new money for social care. It is only by properly investing in social care that we can alleviate the pressures on the NHS.’

Cllr Seccombe also welcomed a call in the report for more effort to be put into engaging NHS staff, patients, the public, local authorities and others when developing STPs.

‘We have long warned that STPs can only be effective if councillors and communities are at the heart of the planning process,’ she said.

‘It is vital they are involved and not just consulted afterwards on pre-determined solutions. Any failure to engage councillors could lead to vociferous opposition.’

The power of local systems to save lives image

The power of local systems to save lives

Councils and their partners could do even more to contain the spread of COVID-19 if properly funded to undertake a robust localised system of testing, tracking and tracing, argues Professor Donna Hall.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Education Support Officer for Virtual School x2

Redbridge London Borough Council
£27,228 -28,215 per annum (pro rata term time only)
The successful candidates will have the opportunity to... Homeworking
Recuriter: Redbridge London Borough Council

Housing Occupational Therapy Manager

Royal Borough of Greenwich
£44.607 - £47.511
We are seeking motivated people, who like a challenge, have a commitment to housing and want to help us deliver excellent services. Greenwich, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Royal Borough of Greenwich

Evolve Practitioner (young adults aged 18-25 years)

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£25,327 to £36,036 per annum
Seeking a suitably experienced Practitioner who has the drive and creativity to support vulnerable young people to see the best in themselves.  London (Greater)
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Team Manager - Family Assessment Service

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£42,656 to £51,690 per annum
This opportunity brings with it a chance to oversee and support workers in the team with the intensive direct work we do with families. London (Greater)
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Executive Director of Strategy & System Development

Cheshire & Merseyside Health & Care Partnership
Significant Six Figure Salary
Following the appointment of Jackie Bene as Chief Officer, we are now looking to appoint an Executive Director of Strategy & System Development Cheshire & Merseyside
Recuriter: Cheshire & Merseyside Health & Care Partnership

Public Property

Latest issue - Public Property News

This issue of Public Property examines how how flexible workspaces can lead the way in regeneration for local authorities, Why local authority intervention is key to successful urban regeneration schemes and if the Government’s challenge of embracing beauty is an opportunity for communities.

The March issue also takes a closer look at Blackburn with Darwen Council's first digital health hub to help people gain control over health and care services.

Register for your free digital issue