William Eichler 03 February 2016

Devolution must be more openly negotiated, urges MPs

The government’s devolution agenda has been characterised by a lack of clear objectives, rushed negotiations, and insufficient openness, according to select committee.

The Communities & Local Government (CLG) Committee welcomes Whitehall's commitment to devolution but urges Government and local leaders to do more to engage the public in devolution proposals, negotiations, and outcomes.

In a report published today the CLG argues there has been a significant lack of public consultation and engagement at all stages of the devolution process, and it calls on local leaders to engage more with the public about devolution deals affecting their areas.

The committee’s report, entitled Devolution: The Next Five Years and Beyond, also stresses that this engagement process shouldn’t halt once the devolution deals are completed. The public, they say, should be consulted on their experience of how it is working in practice.

To this end, the report recommends that the Government should publish online all information on devolution deals so the public can access a range of details on the proposals, deals, and negotiations.

On the question of who is responsible and accountable for public services, the CLG recommends that the division of roles should be clearly laid out in the final deals.

Elected mayors will be the figureheads of the new combined authorities, but they won’t be in charge of everything. This, the CLG report says, must be made clear to the public.

The committee also recommends that the Government makes a clear statement that devolution will take place at different speeds in different areas and that agreed timetables are set out for the negotiation and agreement of a deal.

Finally, the CLG argues that if certain powers are devolved to one area, these same powers should also be made available to other areas.

Clive Betts MP, chair of the Communities and Local Government Committee, said: ‘As a Committee, we strongly support the principle of devolution and welcome its prominent place on the Government's agenda. We believe that the current arrangements should only be a first step towards a much bigger devolution settlement and that devolution should be the default across all government departments.

‘If we are to achieve this local leaders and the Government must make far greater efforts to communicate with and engage the public so they embrace devolution as a positive development too.

‘People rightly want to be involved in discussions and negotiations affecting their communities and local leaders and Government need to up their game to make the devolution process as transparent and engaging as possible.’

Responding to the CLG’s report, Local Government Association chairman Lord Porter said: ‘We celebrate those places which have achieved devolution deals, but as this report makes clear, these opportunities need to be extended across all areas of the country. Like the Committee, we urge government to keep up the momentum in their discussions with non-metropolitan areas to ensure that all areas of England can benefit.

‘Devolution is a massive opportunity to help ensure services are tailored to best meet the needs of local people and we want to see ambition from government departments that matches that of local places in considering the powers devolved and different models of governance appropriate to both cities and county areas.

‘Places should also be able to build on their initial deals and take advantage of a broader range of powers to fully capitalise on the opportunities for their communities and businesses.’

Lord Porter also recognises that there is room for more engagement with the public. ‘While it is right that devolution deals are not imposed, but negotiated and secured by local places, we recognise the need for greater public engagement throughout the deal-making process and are working with councils to support them in this.’

Visit The MJ (£) to read their comment piece on how important it is for local government to prove it can be trusted.

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Finance Officer - 12 month Fixed Term Contract

Essex County Council
£25081.00 - £27653.00 per annum + + 26 Days Leave & Local Gov Pension
Finance OfficerFixed Term, Full Time£25,081 to £27,653 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Tutor

Essex County Council
Up to £30377.00 per annum + Pension
TutorPermanent, Part Time£30,377 per annum full time equivalent Location
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Principal Highway Engineer – Highway Condition Specialist

W.D.M. Limited
£65,000 - £80,000 based on experience
We are looking for a driven and experienced Professional Civil Engineer with a strong background in highways engineering to join our team. Bristol
Recuriter: W.D.M. Limited

Deputy Head of Pensions

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£48,873 - £62,451 dependents on experience
The Pensions Finance team has a variety of work shared in a small team giving the opportunity to get involved in every area. The team provides financial and investment support to Wandsworth Council’s £3bn pension fund, the Southwest Middlesex Cremato Wandsworth, London
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Adults Social Worker - Forensic Mental Health

Essex County Council
£37185 - £50081 per annum + Flexible Working
This position is open to Newly Qualified Social Worker's (NQSW) with relevant experience in Mental Health. The starting salary for NQSW's is £34,902 England, Essex, Wickford
Recuriter: Essex County Council
Linkedin Banner