Laura Sharman 22 October 2015

Councils told to 'weigh up all options' when safeguarding children

Councils have been reminded to consider all the options available when safeguarding vulnerable children to avoid making ‘knee-jerk reactions’.

The Local Government Ombudsman (LGO) has published a report warning councils to weigh up all options and subsequent consequences when taking action to protect children.

The reminder follows an investigation into how Sandwell Council managed an allegation made about a foster carer of two young children. After a foster carer was arrested, social workers woke the children up and removed them from the man’s care. The LGO said there was no evidence the council had a strategy discussion on the best way to remove the children from the man’s care or what other options were available.

The police later said the allegations against the man were unfounded and and considered them to be malicious. The children were returned to their foster home two weeks after the police closed the case.

Dr Jane Martin, Local Government Ombudsman, said: ‘Essential safeguarding processes are in place not to add time and bureaucracy, but to ensure that children’s welfare is paramount.

‘Clearly, councils do not take a decision lightly to urgently remove a child from their home, however they must be able to demonstrate they have thought about all their options and considered the child’s best interests.’

The council has agreed to review its policies in carrying out and recording strategy discussions, and will give staff training on the issue. It will also pay compensation to the foster career and the two children.

Councillor Simon Hackett, Sandwell Council's cabinet member for children's services, said: 'We have a duty to respond in a timely way to make sure vulnerable children are protected. This will always be our top priority.

'We respond on the information available to us at the time, as in this case when we received information from the police. We also have a duty to ensure we have considered all the options and that we have evidenced this correctly.

'We have accepted and are implementing the Ombudsman's recommendations. We have also met with the foster carer after receiving this report.

'We are pleased that the Ombudsman's report acknowledges the council's duty to act promptly in response to child safeguarding risks.'

The £37,000 SEND Problem image

The £37,000 SEND Problem

Natalie Kenneison, COO at Imosphere, argues that the real SEND funding crisis isn’t just about budgets - it’s about the systems behind the decisions.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Portage Worker - SEND and Inclusion

Durham County Council
Grade 8 £31,586 - £35,235
Term-time only (plus one week) – Temporary for 18 months Term-time only (plus one week) – Temporary for 12 months   We are recruiting Portage Workers Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Social Worker

Durham County Council
£34,314 - £37,938 (pre-progression) / £39,513 - £43,693 (post-progression)
We are looking for social workers who have completed their assessed and supported year in employment to join our Families First Service. WHAT IS INVO Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Receptionist

Durham County Council
£24,404 to £25,183 pro rata p.a. Grade 3 (£12.64 to £13.05 per hour)
Casual as and when required opportunity is available Spennymoor Leisure Centre. WHAT IS INVOLVED? In this role you will professionally welcome custom Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Lunchtime Supervisory Assistant

Durham County Council
£24,027 pro rata
2x Lunchtime Supervisory Assistant Vacancies Would you like to work with a group of wonderful children in order to help them to have a happy and sett Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Enhanced Teaching Assistant

Durham County Council
£25,584 - £27,711?pro rata
Enhanced Teaching Assistant Grade 5     £25,584 - £27,711?pro rata Full time, Term Time Only + 2 Weeks Temporary – required from 1st September 2025 un Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner