William Eichler 23 August 2018

Council fined for ‘unfairly’ changing school admission arrangements

Nottinghamshire County Council has been criticised for ‘unfairly’ changing its school admission arrangements and forcing parents to send siblings to separate schools.

In 2016 the local authority stopped prioritising children with siblings who lived outside of a schools’ catchment area in the oversubscription criteria.

This decision, which has been criticised by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, resulted in two families being forced to take their younger children to different primary schools.

The families applied for reception places at the same school for entry in September 2016 but their applications were unsuccessful due to the changes in the school admission arrangements. Their appeals were also rejected.

The Office of the Schools Adjudicator ruled that the new admissions arrangements for September 2017 were unfair. The council then decided to offer second appeals to families affected by the changes.

However, because the school was full, it was unable to offer the families concerned extra places.

‘The changes Nottinghamshire County Council made to its admissions arrangements have had a significant impact on daily life for these two families, which could last until the older siblings have moved on to senior school,’ said LGO Michael King.

‘In cases like this we would normally ask the council to offer a fresh appeal to the families. But because the school has now converted to an academy, neither the council nor we have any authority over its admissions arrangements.’

Nottinghamshire County Council has agreed to pay the two families £500 a year.

Commenting on the LGO’s findings, Cllr Philip Owen, chairman of the Children & Young People’s Committee, said: ‘It is unfortunately the nature of the school admissions process that there are always going to be some families and children left dissatisfied whichever policy an authority adopts.

‘By restoring priority in the oversubscription criteria for children outside a schools’ catchment area who have siblings already at a particular school, this could mean that children who live nearer and perhaps only just outside that school’s catchment may have to go a much longer distance to get to another school.

‘I am not convinced that the adjudication took their rights into account sufficiently.

‘However, Nottinghamshire County Council respects its duty to abide by the Ombudsman’s decision. There is certainly no desire by this authority to act unfairly or cause distress to any family.’

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Adoption Panel Member

Durham County Council
Being reviewed
Do you have experience, either professionally or personally or both, of children being cared for away from their birth family?   Are you passionate ab Seaham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Housing Officer

Durham County Council
Grade 7 £30,024 - £33,699
We currently have three opportunities for Housing Officers to join the team within Homeless Prevention. One vacancy is Temporary until 31st May 2027 a Seaham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Attendance and Safeguarding Officer

Durham County Council
£28,142 - £31,022 pro rata (term time only plus two weeks)
Attendance and Safeguarding Officer Grade 6- £28,142 - £31,022 pro rata (term time only plus two weeks) Temporary- Full Time- Term Time Required from Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Senior Pracitioner - Family Centre, Colchester

Essex County Council
Up to £0.0000 per annum
Senior Pracitioner - Mulberry Tree Family Centre, ColchesterPermanent, Part Time (29.6 hours per week) £48,205 to £57,988 per annum (FTE)£38,564 to £4 England, Essex, Colchester
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Social Worker, Young People with Disabilities

Essex County Council
Up to £0.0000 per annum
Social Worker, Young People with Disabilities, North EssexPermanent, Full Time£36,124 to £51,834 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council
Linkedin Banner