William Eichler 23 August 2018

Council fined for ‘unfairly’ changing school admission arrangements

Nottinghamshire County Council has been criticised for ‘unfairly’ changing its school admission arrangements and forcing parents to send siblings to separate schools.

In 2016 the local authority stopped prioritising children with siblings who lived outside of a schools’ catchment area in the oversubscription criteria.

This decision, which has been criticised by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, resulted in two families being forced to take their younger children to different primary schools.

The families applied for reception places at the same school for entry in September 2016 but their applications were unsuccessful due to the changes in the school admission arrangements. Their appeals were also rejected.

The Office of the Schools Adjudicator ruled that the new admissions arrangements for September 2017 were unfair. The council then decided to offer second appeals to families affected by the changes.

However, because the school was full, it was unable to offer the families concerned extra places.

‘The changes Nottinghamshire County Council made to its admissions arrangements have had a significant impact on daily life for these two families, which could last until the older siblings have moved on to senior school,’ said LGO Michael King.

‘In cases like this we would normally ask the council to offer a fresh appeal to the families. But because the school has now converted to an academy, neither the council nor we have any authority over its admissions arrangements.’

Nottinghamshire County Council has agreed to pay the two families £500 a year.

Commenting on the LGO’s findings, Cllr Philip Owen, chairman of the Children & Young People’s Committee, said: ‘It is unfortunately the nature of the school admissions process that there are always going to be some families and children left dissatisfied whichever policy an authority adopts.

‘By restoring priority in the oversubscription criteria for children outside a schools’ catchment area who have siblings already at a particular school, this could mean that children who live nearer and perhaps only just outside that school’s catchment may have to go a much longer distance to get to another school.

‘I am not convinced that the adjudication took their rights into account sufficiently.

‘However, Nottinghamshire County Council respects its duty to abide by the Ombudsman’s decision. There is certainly no desire by this authority to act unfairly or cause distress to any family.’

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Team Manager

Durham County Council
Grade 14 - £50,269 - £54,495
Are you an experienced, motivated leader with a passion for improving outcomes for children and young people? We’re looking for someone who can inspir Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Social Worker, Connecting Families Team

Durham County Council
Grade 9 £35,412 - £39,152 (Pre-Progression) / Grade 11 £44,075 - £48,226 (Post-Progression)
Connecting families are a team within the Children in Care service in Durham. The team support families of children who are subject to a Section 31 Ca Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Human Resources Officer Advice and Support

Durham County Council
£35,412 to £39,152 p.a. (Grade 9)
  Do you want a new challenge?  An opportunity to develop your career in HR or try something new? If so, come and join our team. The post is full tim Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Support Officer

Durham County Council
Grade 6 £28,142 - £31,022
WHAT IS INVOLVED?   Do you want a role where your organisation skills make a real difference in local communities? Join our Newly remodelled Local Net Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

School Crossing Patrol

Durham County Council
Grade 1 £4,800 (approx.) £12.85 per hour
Join our School Crossing Patrol Service! Are you punctual and reliable? Do you have good communication skills and a strong sense of community spirit? Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner