William Eichler 23 August 2018

Council fined for ‘unfairly’ changing school admission arrangements

Nottinghamshire County Council has been criticised for ‘unfairly’ changing its school admission arrangements and forcing parents to send siblings to separate schools.

In 2016 the local authority stopped prioritising children with siblings who lived outside of a schools’ catchment area in the oversubscription criteria.

This decision, which has been criticised by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, resulted in two families being forced to take their younger children to different primary schools.

The families applied for reception places at the same school for entry in September 2016 but their applications were unsuccessful due to the changes in the school admission arrangements. Their appeals were also rejected.

The Office of the Schools Adjudicator ruled that the new admissions arrangements for September 2017 were unfair. The council then decided to offer second appeals to families affected by the changes.

However, because the school was full, it was unable to offer the families concerned extra places.

‘The changes Nottinghamshire County Council made to its admissions arrangements have had a significant impact on daily life for these two families, which could last until the older siblings have moved on to senior school,’ said LGO Michael King.

‘In cases like this we would normally ask the council to offer a fresh appeal to the families. But because the school has now converted to an academy, neither the council nor we have any authority over its admissions arrangements.’

Nottinghamshire County Council has agreed to pay the two families £500 a year.

Commenting on the LGO’s findings, Cllr Philip Owen, chairman of the Children & Young People’s Committee, said: ‘It is unfortunately the nature of the school admissions process that there are always going to be some families and children left dissatisfied whichever policy an authority adopts.

‘By restoring priority in the oversubscription criteria for children outside a schools’ catchment area who have siblings already at a particular school, this could mean that children who live nearer and perhaps only just outside that school’s catchment may have to go a much longer distance to get to another school.

‘I am not convinced that the adjudication took their rights into account sufficiently.

‘However, Nottinghamshire County Council respects its duty to abide by the Ombudsman’s decision. There is certainly no desire by this authority to act unfairly or cause distress to any family.’

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Chief Executive

West Surrey Council
c.£235,000
In April 2027, West Surrey Council will become one of England's largest new unitary authorities Surrey
Recuriter: West Surrey Council

Performance & Information Assistant

Essex County Council
£26622 - £29787 per annum
Are you organised, detail-focused and confident working with data and information? We are looking for a proactive Performance and Information Assista England, Essex, Braintree
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Senior Social Worker - Learning Disability & Autism

Essex County Council
£48205 - £57988 per annum + Flexible Working, Hybrid Working
About the TeamThis is an exciting opportunity for a passionate and experienced Social Worker to join an innovative and award-winning Learning Disabil England, Essex, Harlow
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Health and Safety Advisor

Durham County Council
£35,412 to £39,152 p.a. (Grade 9) pay award pending
An exciting opportunity has arisen within Health and Safety for a Health and Safety Advisor. This post is temporary to cover a period of maternity le Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Locality Delivery Manager (Foster with North East)

Durham County Council
Band 1 - £73,733 - £76, 063 per annum
This is an exceptional opportunity for an experienced and ambitious senior leader to join the Foster with North East Senior Leadership Team and help t Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner