Laura Sharman 05 July 2017

Council chiefs withdraw support for Better Care Funding guidance

Council leaders have hit out at ‘last minute’ plans to penalise authorities that fail to reduce bed blocking in their area.

In the Better Care Fund Planning Requirements, which stipulate how social care and NHS funding to support integration is to be spent, the Government has suggested councils could face financial penalties if targets on delayed transfers are not met.

However, the Local Government Association (LGA) said the plans were ‘extremely disappointing’ and represented a ‘step back’ for the integration of health and social care.

‘The sudden shift in focus, so late in the process to prioritise delayed transfers of care, and the threat of a review of funding allocations if associated targets are not met, is completely unacceptable to local government,’ said cllr Izzi Seccombe, chairman of the LGA’s Community Wellbeing Board,

‘Councils cannot now have confidence to plan for the long-term. We have had assurance that no more than 10% of funding would be affected by the performance review and that all the funding would stay with councils. But the principle is wrong and difficult in practical terms; councils have already agreed their plans locally and made commitments on how to spend this year’s allocation.

‘This is extremely disappointing and a step back for integrating health and care. It has left the LGA with no choice but to withdraw our support for the guidance.’

The Association of Directors of Adult Social Services (ADASS) also warned that the guidance had undermined efforts to support integration.

Margaret Willcox, president of ADASS, said: ‘In many areas directors have already obtained a level of agreement as to how best utilise this much needed funding, responding quickly to encouragement to start to use these funds to make a difference in local areas.

‘ADASS is very disappointed by the last minute unilateral changes to guidance that have taken place in the last few days. The consequence is to undermine the collective effort required.’

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Education Navigator - Integrated Front Door

Cheshire East Council
£43,149 - £49,658 per annum
Are you passionate about making a positive difference to the lives of children, young people and families? Macclesfield, Cheshire
Recuriter: Cheshire East Council

Executive Director of Finance and Assets (Section 151 Officer)

West Surrey Council
£161,239–£177,363
You will also lead a more strategic approach to West Surrey’s assets, income and commercial activity. West Surrey
Recuriter: West Surrey Council

Technical & Validation Officer

Ashfield District Council
£29,542 - £32,046 per annum
We have an opportunity available for a Technical & Validation Officer Kirkby-in-Ashfield, Nottingham
Recuriter: Ashfield District Council

Environmental Services Operative (Driver)

Ashfield District Council
£27,274 - £29,071 per annum
Where applicable the skills, qualifications and memberships required for this job have also been included. Sutton-In-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire
Recuriter: Ashfield District Council

Environment Area Supervisor

Ashfield District Council
£33,119 - £35,570 per annum
We are seeking an experienced, forward-thinking and highly motivated operational team leader Sutton-In-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire
Recuriter: Ashfield District Council
Linkedin Banner