08 October 2024

An alternative to Winter Fuel Payments

An alternative to Winter Fuel Payments image
Image: Yau Ming Low / Shutterstock.com.

Alex Clegg, economist at the Resolution Foundation, sets out a possible alternative to Winter Fuel Payments.

The announcement this summer that Winter Fuel Payments are to be restricted to recipients of Pension Credit or similar means-tested benefits has sparked considerable controversy.

The Government and its defenders point to the lack of sense, in these straitened times, of making fuel payments to all pensioners when the majority do not need them. Opponents highlight the number of low-income pensioners who do not claim (or even qualify) for Pension Credit, who are now set to lose much-needed support.

Universal Winter Fuel Payments are clearly an inefficient way to address the current reality of energy cost pressures in Britain. But concerns for vulnerable pensioners who are set to lose out are valid and, with the Government unlikely to reverse its decision, mitigations should be put in place this winter to soften the impact of the cut.

Crucially, increased support should not stop at pensioners. Last year, working-age households were almost twice as likely as pensioner households to be in fuel stress in England (defined as needing to spend more than 10% of household income on energy to have an adequate standard of warmth). This is even more stark for families with children: 56% of couples with children and a staggering 77% of lone parents were in fuel stress last year, compared to 24% of pensioner households. The fairer way to provide support for energy bills would therefore be to target all poorer families with high energy costs, regardless of age.

At the Resolution Foundation, we have looked at options for support that could be put in place for this winter. Viable options should target support based on both income and energy need. Support should also cost less than the pencilled-in savings from the Winter Fuel Payment restriction. This is tricky, however: most options utilising the benefit system cannot target directly based on energy need and do not cover the substantial number of poor households that, for whatever reason, do not receive benefits. Options to reduce bills directly in the energy sector cannot pinpoint who has a low income.

Our research has considered various alternative means for providing support, starting with reducing bills directly through energy bill support, cutting costs for families on pre-payment meters and expanding the Warm Home Discount scheme. But none of these options are up to scratch – they either fail to target low-income households or fail to reach low-income pensioners who aren’t eligible for means-tested support (the same problem that means-testing Winter Fuel Payments has created).

But our research shows that an expansion of the Cold Weather Payments scheme could provide a viable quick fix solution to support vulnerable households should Britain suffer a chilly winter. Extending eligibility and raising the temperature at which Cold Weather Payments are triggered is perhaps the most promising avenue, because it can target based on reasonable proxies for income and energy need. It could also replicate a cut-price version of the universalism lost in the Winter Fuel Payment cut, if eligibility were expanded to all recipients of the State Pension. This would mean all poor pensioners are covered, regardless of whether they claim benefits. You could even extend eligibility to low-income working-age families – who are most likely to suffer from fuel stress this winter – while still retaining savings from scaling back eligibility for Winter Fuel Payments.

Even this option, however, should be considered an imperfect, quick-fix method of getting support to households that are likely to struggle with energy bills this winter. In the long-term, the Government should set up an energy social tariff that can target support directly based on incomes and energy needs, rather than using proxies. This will take significant work on data matching, and it is thus too late to have something in place this winter, but the Government should start planning to have something up and running in 2025-26 to avoid the need for further quick-fix approaches to delivering energy support.

The Government is facing mounting opposition to its decision to restrict Winter Fuel Payments. But if the end result is a new support that reaches families in fuel stress across all age groups – that’s a policy solution that we can all rally behind.

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Finance Assistant - Banking, Controls & Reconciliation

Essex County Council
Up to £25081.00 per annum
Finance Assistant - Banking, Controls & Reconciliation Fixed Term, Full Time£25,081 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Park Operations Assistant

Essex County Council
Up to £25959.00 per annum
Park Operations AssistantPermanent, Part Time£25,959 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Science Teacher

Durham County Council
£32,916 - £51,048
Science Teacher M1- UPS3 £32,916 - £51,048 Permanent, Full time Required as soon as possible The Woodlands EHN Team is seeking to appoint a qualified Ferryhill
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Hospitality and Catering Instructor

Durham County Council
£27,663 - £37,875 Instructor Scale B
WHAT IS INVOLVED? The team at Aycliffe Secure Centre provide a caring, trauma informed and aspirational environment for young people aged between 10 a Newton Aycliffe
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Lawyer Contracts and Procurement

Durham County Council
£47,181 to £51,356 p.a. (Grade 13)
An exciting opportunity has arisen for a Contracts and Procurement Lawyer to work at Durham County Council as part of the Legal and Democratic Service Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner