Mark Whitehead 17 September 2015

£86,000 for a new image: money well spent?

We live in image-conscious times. But we also live in cost-conscious times: this is the rub with a plan by a north London council to spend almost £86,000 on a rebranding exercise.

Many will sympathise with Haringey’s leaders wanting to give its logo, signage and general appearance a once-over.

Especially as the borough is full of media types who might regard the price tag as pretty reasonable compared with what a commercial company might spend on a new image.

But Haringay, like other councils up and down the land, has had its budgets slashed and been forced to make big cuts including in its social services.

So it’s not surprising opposition leaders should describe the whole thing as ‘outrageous’.

The council’s case for a new look hasn’t been helped by the apparently secretive approach local critics accuse it of adopting.

There is a report outlining the project explains the rationale behind it, the costs and how the agency was selected. It’s all perfectly above board and makes a clear case for spending the money.

There have evidently been focus groups asking what people feel about the place where they live which has apparently fed into the new designs.

The problem is, the general population in the streets of Haringey knew nothing about any of it.

One local activist went to the trouble of submitting a Freedom of Information request to find out what rumours of a new logo, street signs and stationery were all about.

That was on 25 June. A reply finally on 6 August arrived saying £40,000 had been allocated to explore a change of identity but ‘no decision has been taken.’

Full information on the project could not be given, it explained, because under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act its release would be likely to inhibit ’free and frank exchange of views for the purposes of deliberation.’

So Haringey will shortly have a new logo, its staff will sport shiny pin badges and the refuse trucks will display rebranded signs.

Whether or not the money has been well spent is up for public discussion - which will no doubt commence now that people know what was decided, how much of their council tax went on it and what the new image will look like.

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Housing Ombudsman

Housing Ombudsman Service
£130,095 per annum, negotiable based on experience.
The Housing Ombudsman Service allows colleagues to choose if they wish to work in the London office, from home or a hybrid of the two London (Greater)
Recuriter: Housing Ombudsman Service

Head of Legal and Monitoring Officer

Powys County Council
£90,347 – £98,135 per annum/y flwyddyn
We’re seeking an energetic, innovative, and inspirational leader to join our team at Powys County Council Powys
Recuriter: Powys County Council

Financial Systems Officer

West Northamptonshire Council
£30560 - £32212
This is a great opportunity to join our Business Systems Team as a Financial Systems Officer, supporting the smooth running of key financial processes across our ERP environment. You’ll be part of a team that provides shared services to multiple partner Northampton
Recuriter: West Northamptonshire Council

Principal Litigation Lawyer - Epping Forest District Council

Essex County Council
Up to £55.0000 per hour
Epping Forest District Council - Legal Services Principal Litigation Lawyer - Epping Forest District Council£55 per hour Umbrella36 hours per week C England, Essex
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Council Tax Recovery Officer

West Northamptonshire Council
£34,203 - £37,067
Are you looking for your next role where you can make a real difference to your local community? As a Council Tax Recovery Officer, you'll play a vital role in ensuring income due to the Council is collected efficiently and fairly - helping to fund essent Northampton
Recuriter: West Northamptonshire Council
Linkedin Banner