William Eichler 27 April 2017

Whitehall’s approach to sustainable drainage ‘sub-standand’, MPs warn

MPs have criticised the Government’s ‘sub-standard’ approach to sustainable drainage (SuDs) for failing to protect communities from flood risk.

The environment, food, and rural affairs committee’s analysis of the Flood and Water Management Act 2010 condemns the resulting weak SuDS policies, warning they put areas at risk and ‘miss opportunities’ to enhance the amenity and environment of local communities.

According to the committee, SuDs provide a cost-effective, green method of removing surface water from built-up areas.

However, they found the Government had not commenced provisions to set up a ‘robust policy framework’ to promote their use and has instead adopted sub-standard planning policies which have led to far too few schemes being installed in new developments.

Many of the SuDs schemes that have been put in place are of ‘low quality’, the committee found.

‘Significant improvements in the numbers and quality of SuDS schemes installed must be delivered by the end of 2018,’ said committee chair Neil Parish.

‘We urge our successor Committee to consider calling for the full commencement of SuDS provisions in the 2010 Act if this is not achieved.’

Mr Parish urged the Government to strengthen planning rules to ensure all new developments are required to install high-quality sustainable drainage systems.

He also said guidance must be tightened to reduce the potential for developers to opt-out from installing schemes on cost or site-practicality grounds.

In addition, Mr Parish said, standards for SuDS construction must be made statutory to provide a stronger basis for enforcement and make it easier for Water and Sewerage Companies to adopt SuDS.

He concluded by calling for an ending of the automatic right of new developments to connect surface water discharges to conventional sewerage systems in order to spur developers to use sustainable alternatives.

Black hole spending review image

Black hole spending review

Jonathan Werran, chief executive of Localis, reflects on what the Spending Review means for local government.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Head of Regeneration

Redbridge London Borough Council
£96,861 - £100,671
Right now, we’re in the midst of ambitious regeneration plans that will transform our borough for generations to come Redbridge, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Redbridge London Borough Council

Head of Leisure & Culture

Redbridge London Borough Council
£96,861 - £100,671
Our borough’s Leisure and Culture provision is integral to making Redbridge a great place to live Redbridge, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Redbridge London Borough Council

Head of Leader’s Office

Redbridge London Borough Council
£59,739 - £63,159
This role will see you working at the very centre of the Council’s work Redbridge, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Redbridge London Borough Council

Head of Operational Services

South Derbyshire District Council
£73,051 to £75,342
Ready to shape the future of a thriving district? Derbyshire
Recuriter: South Derbyshire District Council

Director of Family Help and Safeguarding

Reading Borough Council
£105,836 - £121,235
Lead Transformational and Improvement Change for Children’s Services Reading, Berkshire
Recuriter: Reading Borough Council
Linkedin Banner