William Eichler 18 July 2019

Whitehall ‘too slow’ in reforming fire safety rules after Grenfell

Whitehall ‘too slow’ in reforming fire safety rules after Grenfell  image

The Government has been ‘far too slow’ in reforming the building and fire safety regime in the wake of the Grenfell tragedy, MPs have said.

The Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee has criticised the Government’s response to the Grenfell Tower fire arguing that they are not doing enough to remove dangerous cladding from existing buildings.

The fire in the west London high-rise building, which took the lives of 72 people two years ago this month, spread rabidly because of the type of cladding used on the outside.

It is estimated that more than 200 high-rise buildings still have similar cladding – a fact which has prompted firefighters to warn of the risk of ‘sleepwalking into another catastrophic loss of life’.

In May, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government committed £200m – on top of £400m already available – to remove aluminium composite material cladding from what the Government says is around 170 privately owned high-rise buildings.

The communities secretary, James Brokenshire, also criticised private building owners at the time for not acting quickly enough.

‘While some building owners have been swift to act, and I thank them for doing the right thing, I am now calling time on the delay tactics of others,’ he said.

‘If these reckless building owners won’t act, the Government will.’

The Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee report, however, warned that the £200m fund is insufficient.

It also criticised Whitehall for failing to provide funding for other forms of potentially dangerous cladding materials currently found on hundreds more existing residential and high-risk buildings.

‘We are two years on from the Grenfell Tower disaster and the Government is far behind where it should be in every aspect of its response,’ said the committee chair Clive Betts.

‘Further delay is simply not acceptable. The Government cannot morally justify funding the replacement of one form of dangerous cladding, but not others.

‘It should immediately extend its fund to cover the removal and replacement of any form of combustible cladding – as defined by the Government’s combustible cladding ban – from any high-rise or high-risk building.’

The HCLG committee also called for ‘greater urgency’ in establishing an effective regulatory system that ensures building safety in the long-term.

‘Much more progress should also have been made on developing a comprehensive building and fire safety framework,’ said Mr Betts.

‘This is simply not good enough,’ he continued.

‘It has been over two years since the fire at Grenfell Tower, and more than a year since the publication of the Final Report of the Independent Review of Building Regulations and Fire Safety, and yet the Government has only just published a consultation into its proposals for reform of the building safety regulatory system.

'The Government must pick up the pace of reform, before it is too late.’

Responding to the report, a spokesperson for the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said: ‘Public safety is paramount and within days of the Grenfell Tower fire a comprehensive Building Safety Programme was put in place to ensure residents of high-rise properties are always kept safe.

‘We have committed up to £600m to fund the removal and replacement of unsafe ACM cladding on high-rise social and private residential buildings.

‘Ultimately building owners are responsible for the safety of their building and we expect them to carry out work quickly – anything less is unacceptable.’

Declaring a climate change emergency image

Declaring a climate change emergency

Local authorities can play a key role in tackling climate change – and there is plenty for them to do. Never before has thinking globally and acting locally been more important, says Mark Whitehead.
Open letter to Boris Johnson image

Open letter to Boris Johnson

The MJ's editor Heather Jameson asks the new PM a simple question: do you want to fund local government or do you want to scale back services to the basics?
Highways jobs

DEPUTY DIRECTOR

City of Bradford MDC
£102K
Big and diverse, Bradford is the UK’s youngest city Bradford, West Yorkshire
Recuriter: City of Bradford MDC

Senior Financial Accountant

Essex County Council
£50001.0 - £59590 per annum
Essex County Council is one the largest and most complex local authorities in the UK, with a turnover of £2bn. We are a Council with high ambitions, a England, Essex, Chelmsford
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Financial Accountant

Essex County Council
£38001.0 - £44440 per annum
Essex County Council is one the largest and most complex local authorities in the UK, with a turnover of £2bn. We are a Council with high ambitions, a England, Essex, Chelmsford
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Senior Practitioner - Children in Care

Essex County Council
£38000.0 - £46000.0 per annum
Senior Practitioner - Children in Care - BasildonIn ECC we are "Serious about Social Work". Having recently won the Best Social Work Employer of the Y England, Essex, Basildon
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Casual Lifeguard

Chelmsford City Council
Grade 3 - £9.29 per hour
South Woodham Ferrers Leisure Centre is a large, multi-purpose complex accommodating a swimming pool, a sports hall, two further halls, Fitness Roo... Chelmsford, Essex
Recuriter: Chelmsford City Council

Local Government News

Latest issue - Local Goverrnemnt News

The June issue of Local Government News contains the full details of all the winning schemes in the 2019 Street Design Awards. From Children's Play to Pedestrian Environment, find out who has been recognised for their innovation and use of best practice.

This issue also explores how local government pension funds can hedge currency risk, how councils can best address the shortfall in school places, and an update on the number of authorities banning the use of Roundup over safety fears.

Register for your free magazine