William Eichler 18 July 2019

Whitehall ‘too slow’ in reforming fire safety rules after Grenfell

Whitehall ‘too slow’ in reforming fire safety rules after Grenfell  image

The Government has been ‘far too slow’ in reforming the building and fire safety regime in the wake of the Grenfell tragedy, MPs have said.

The Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee has criticised the Government’s response to the Grenfell Tower fire arguing that they are not doing enough to remove dangerous cladding from existing buildings.

The fire in the west London high-rise building, which took the lives of 72 people two years ago this month, spread rabidly because of the type of cladding used on the outside.

It is estimated that more than 200 high-rise buildings still have similar cladding – a fact which has prompted firefighters to warn of the risk of ‘sleepwalking into another catastrophic loss of life’.

In May, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government committed £200m – on top of £400m already available – to remove aluminium composite material cladding from what the Government says is around 170 privately owned high-rise buildings.

The communities secretary, James Brokenshire, also criticised private building owners at the time for not acting quickly enough.

‘While some building owners have been swift to act, and I thank them for doing the right thing, I am now calling time on the delay tactics of others,’ he said.

‘If these reckless building owners won’t act, the Government will.’

The Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee report, however, warned that the £200m fund is insufficient.

It also criticised Whitehall for failing to provide funding for other forms of potentially dangerous cladding materials currently found on hundreds more existing residential and high-risk buildings.

‘We are two years on from the Grenfell Tower disaster and the Government is far behind where it should be in every aspect of its response,’ said the committee chair Clive Betts.

‘Further delay is simply not acceptable. The Government cannot morally justify funding the replacement of one form of dangerous cladding, but not others.

‘It should immediately extend its fund to cover the removal and replacement of any form of combustible cladding – as defined by the Government’s combustible cladding ban – from any high-rise or high-risk building.’

The HCLG committee also called for ‘greater urgency’ in establishing an effective regulatory system that ensures building safety in the long-term.

‘Much more progress should also have been made on developing a comprehensive building and fire safety framework,’ said Mr Betts.

‘This is simply not good enough,’ he continued.

‘It has been over two years since the fire at Grenfell Tower, and more than a year since the publication of the Final Report of the Independent Review of Building Regulations and Fire Safety, and yet the Government has only just published a consultation into its proposals for reform of the building safety regulatory system.

'The Government must pick up the pace of reform, before it is too late.’

Responding to the report, a spokesperson for the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said: ‘Public safety is paramount and within days of the Grenfell Tower fire a comprehensive Building Safety Programme was put in place to ensure residents of high-rise properties are always kept safe.

‘We have committed up to £600m to fund the removal and replacement of unsafe ACM cladding on high-rise social and private residential buildings.

‘Ultimately building owners are responsible for the safety of their building and we expect them to carry out work quickly – anything less is unacceptable.’

Meeting new planning requirements for trees image

Meeting new planning requirements for trees

Concrete block permeable paving offers an important opportunity to help satisfy the requirement for extensive tree planting and retention of existing trees in developments. Chris Hodson reports.
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Senior Accountant x2

Islington London Borough Council
£39,462 - £45,594 per annum
There are two roles currently being advertised, one working with our Resources finance team, and one with our Housing and Public Health finance team. Islington, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Islington London Borough Council

Programme Director – Fisheries

Falkland Islands Government
£50,771 up to £56,292
The Programme Director – Fisheries will support the Director of Natural Resources Falkland Islands (FK)
Recuriter: Falkland Islands Government

Principal Engineer/Team Leader Street Works

Bath & North East Somerset Council
£39,880 - £42,821 pa
The Council’s Street Works Team is responsible for managing all aspects of road works and events that take place on our highway network. Keynsham, Bristol
Recuriter: Bath & North East Somerset Council

Social Worker / Advanced Practitioner – Children & Families Service

North Yorkshire County Council
£30,451 - £39,880 per annum pro rata + relocation support
North Yorkshire County Council have a national reputation for excellence. Skipton, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: North Yorkshire County Council

Senior Technician - Asset Management - Highways & Flood Risk

West Berkshire Council
£23,541 to £29,577 per annum (Grade G)
We are currently looking to recruit to two exciting opportunities who will join us and play a role in improving West Berkshire’s highways. Newbury, Berkshire
Recuriter: West Berkshire Council

Public Property

Latest issue - Public Property News

This issue of Public Property examines how how flexible workspaces can lead the way in regeneration for local authorities, Why local authority intervention is key to successful urban regeneration schemes and if the Government’s challenge of embracing beauty is an opportunity for communities.

The March issue also takes a closer look at Blackburn with Darwen Council's first digital health hub to help people gain control over health and care services.

Register for your free digital issue