Martin Ford 03 September 2021

‘No evidence’ integration improves healthcare

‘No evidence’ integration improves healthcare image

New analysis of health and care integration pilots has questioned the benefits they bring about.

A report by the Centre for Policy Studies (CPS) think-tank has urged the Government to gather more evidence before pressing ahead with widespread reforms.

The pre-pandemic analysis of existing pilot schemes found ‘no compelling evidence of overall improvement’.

Highlighting Greater Manchester, the CPS described results as ‘generally poor’, with a 65% increase in delayed transfers of care despite a £450m cash injection.

In another area of focus, West Yorkshire, the research found emergency readmissions to hospital had risen to 14.4% by 2019/20, overtaking the national average.

Across the 13 pilot areas, delayed transfers of care increased by 24% between 2016 and 2020, compared to a 9% increase in other NHS trusts.

The CPS has recommended a delay to putting Integrated Care Systems on a statutory footing, as planned under the Health and Care Bill, until 2026 – giving more time to collect evidence from the pilots.

Instead, priority should be given to ‘bottom-up integration and collaboration’ and developing the Better Care Fund as a ‘more effective and less disruptive model of integration’.

Senior Researcher at the CPS, Karl Williams, said: ‘Everyone seems to be in such fervent agreement that the ICS model of integration and collaboration is the future of the NHS that hardly anyone appears to have looked properly at whether this approach works in practice.

‘Ministers need to take a step back and let the pilot schemes run their course so we can properly evaluate their success. Now is not the time to push through costly and disruptive reforms that are not supported by the data, especially given the current pressures on the NHS and its staff.

Responding to the report, Louise Patten, ICS network lead at the NHS Confederation, said: ‘Any delays to the bill will set back months of progress and, ultimately, harm patients.

‘There are many examples up and down the country of how health and social care organisations are working in partnership to deliver measurably better care for the public.

‘We need to continue this progress and empower local leaders to tailor services to their local communities.’

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Payroll Project Specialist

Essex County Council
Up to £148.8800 per day
Payroll Project Specialist x2£148.88 PAYE / £193.782 Umbrella daily rate Up To 6-Month Fixed Term (with potential extension) Essex County Council - England, Essex, Chelmsford
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Senior Business Development Officer (MaaS)

Essex County Council
£36341.0000 - £42754.0000 per annum
Senior Business Development Officer (MaaS)Fixed Term, 2-year contract with potential for extension Full Time, 37 hours per week£36,341 to £42,754 per England, Essex, Chelmsford
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Senior Finance BP - Epping Forest District Council

Essex County Council
Up to £55307.0000 per annum
Senior Finance Business Partner - Epping Forest District CouncilFull-Time, Permanent 37 Hours per Week £55,307 + £10,000 Market Supplement Closing Dat England, Essex
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Mechanical Design Engineer

Durham County Council
Career Grade 9 to 12 (G9 £35,412 - £39,152) (G10 £38,220 - £41,771) (G11 £40,777 - £45,091) (G12 £44,075 - £48,226) per annum
The Construction Consultancy Services (CCS) team provide client-side construction consultancy services across a range of professional disciplines to d Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Area Principal Educational Psychologist

Durham County Council
£65,432 - £69,399 Soulbury Scale B 8-11 (plus SPA points up to £73,412)
We are looking for an experienced Educational Psychologist with good interpersonal and communication skills who is ready to step up into a Senior Educ Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner