Ellie Ames 22 January 2025

London drivers receiving invalid fines, AA finds

London drivers receiving invalid fines, AA finds image
Image: Roserunn / Shutterstock.com

Research by the AA has revealed that authorities in London have been issuing drivers with invalid penalty charge notices (PCNs).

A review of appeals taken to the London Tribunals in the three weeks up to 4 January found that at least 12 authorities had wrongly fined drivers, with 17 appeals upheld.

The authorities were Lambeth, Croydon, Harrow, Redbridge, Greenwich, Ealing, Hammersmith and Fulham, Newham, Westminster, and Havering councils, the City of London Corporation, and Transport for London.

Traffic adjudicators ordered that fines were cancelled for a range of reasons, including because authorities could not prove that the traffic management order (TMO) had not expired or that an enforcement camera had been installed legally.

In two instances, the supposed contravention was found not to have occurred at all, and in several cases drivers were fined when the signage to inform them of a restriction was inadequate.

One driver was issued with two fines for entering two restricted access areas – but she pointed out that once she realised she had driven into one, there was no way of leaving it without entering the other.

In another case, a woman was assured by a council employee that her resident permit enabled her to enter restricted school zones – but the council later fined her for doing so.

A London Councils spokesperson said: ‘We encourage any motorist who does not believe that the PCN should have been issued to make representations to the relevant local authority, and then appeal any rejected decision with London Tribunals.’

Overall, 56% of appeals made against bus lane penalties in London last year were either upheld or not contested. The figure was 35% for moving traffic offences.

Luke Bosdet, from the AA's motoring policy unit, said the Department for Transport (DfT) needed to review the ‘lack of accountability’ for councils’ road traffic enforcement.

The DfT said councils must ensure that TMOs were up to date, and that it would be ‘sharing proposals to modernise this process’ and make it more efficient.

LocalGov Weekly Round Up image

LocalGov Weekly Round Up

A pivotal week for councils sees fresh devolution plans, new service pilots and key legal and political battles, writes LocalGov editor William Eichler.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Cleaner

Durham County Council
£24,796 (Pro rata)
Cleaner Grade 1, £24,796 (Pro rata) Permanent, part time. 12.5 hours per week Currently 3.30pm to 6pm Monday to Friday (subject to change depending on Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Outreach Support Assistant

Durham County Council
£32,597 - £36,363
Outreach Support Assistant x 6 Grade 8, £32,597 - £36,363 Permanent, full time. Required to start ASAP.   We are seeking to appoint to the Secondary O Ferryhill
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Tenant Support

Durham County Council
Grade 2 - £24,796 - £25,185 (pro-rata)
If you have elderly friends and relatives, you will understand the value they place on independence. This role will give you the opportunity to work Consett
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Home Care and Support Worker

Durham County Council
Grade 4 - £25,583 - £26,824 (pro-rata)
We currently have multiple vacancies available including permament part time and a casual role. If you have elderly friends and relatives, you will u Consett
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Data Science and Innovation Officer

Durham County Council
Grade 12 £44,075 to £48,226 per annum
We are looking to appoint two enthusiastic, hardworking, and motivated Data Scence and Innovation Officers to join Durham’s Data & Insight service. On Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner