Ellie Ames Wednesday, January 22, 2025

London drivers receiving invalid fines, AA finds

London drivers receiving invalid fines, AA finds image
Image: Roserunn / Shutterstock.com

Research by the AA has revealed that authorities in London have been issuing drivers with invalid penalty charge notices (PCNs).

A review of appeals taken to the London Tribunals in the three weeks up to 4 January found that at least 12 authorities had wrongly fined drivers, with 17 appeals upheld.

The authorities were Lambeth, Croydon, Harrow, Redbridge, Greenwich, Ealing, Hammersmith and Fulham, Newham, Westminster, and Havering councils, the City of London Corporation, and Transport for London.

Traffic adjudicators ordered that fines were cancelled for a range of reasons, including because authorities could not prove that the traffic management order (TMO) had not expired or that an enforcement camera had been installed legally.

In two instances, the supposed contravention was found not to have occurred at all, and in several cases drivers were fined when the signage to inform them of a restriction was inadequate.

One driver was issued with two fines for entering two restricted access areas – but she pointed out that once she realised she had driven into one, there was no way of leaving it without entering the other.

In another case, a woman was assured by a council employee that her resident permit enabled her to enter restricted school zones – but the council later fined her for doing so.

A London Councils spokesperson said: ‘We encourage any motorist who does not believe that the PCN should have been issued to make representations to the relevant local authority, and then appeal any rejected decision with London Tribunals.’

Overall, 56% of appeals made against bus lane penalties in London last year were either upheld or not contested. The figure was 35% for moving traffic offences.

Luke Bosdet, from the AA's motoring policy unit, said the Department for Transport (DfT) needed to review the ‘lack of accountability’ for councils’ road traffic enforcement.

The DfT said councils must ensure that TMOs were up to date, and that it would be ‘sharing proposals to modernise this process’ and make it more efficient.

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Team Manager - DBIT Core Service, North Essex

Essex County Council
£55892.0000 - £69241.0000 per annum
Team Manager - DBIT Core Service, North EssexFixed Term, Full Time£55,892 to £69,241 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Social Worker

Durham County Council
Grade 9 - £35,412 - £39,152 (pre-progression) / Grade 11 - £40,777 - £45,091 (post-progression) - Pay Award Pending
We are looking for a social worker who has completed their assessed and supported year in employment to join our Children in Care teams. In this role Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Service Manager – Child Protection and Allegations Management

Durham County Council
£56,554 - £60,680 - Grade 16
We are looking for a Service Manager to lead our newly created Child Protection and Allegations Management Service. This is a brand-new leadership rol Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Business Rates Officer

Durham County Council
£26,403 to £28,598 p.a. (Grade 5) pay award pending
Do you have experience of dealing with members of the public in a caring and responsive manner?  Do you have good organisational, numerical and time m Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Assessment and Awards Officer

Durham County Council
£26,403 to £28,598 p.a. (Grade 5) pay award pending
Do you have experience of dealing with members of the public in a caring and responsive manner?  Do you have good organisational, numerical and time m Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner