Hiba Mahamadi 16 March 2018

Government oversight of LEPs not good enough, MPs say

The Public Accounts Committee has stressed its lack of faith in the Government’s overview of local enterprise partnerships in a critical report published today.

The report, on the Greater Cambridgeshire Greater Peterborough local enterprise partnership (GCGP LEP), concluded the Government’s claims last year that the LEP had no problems were ‘without substance’.

The report said: ‘The department’s oversight system failed to identify GCGP LEP as one which should have raised concerns.

‘The department has repeatedly given assurances to us that it has resolved issues in LEPs, but the case of GCGP LEP suggests that these assurances are without substance.

‘Moreover, the department did not flag GCGP as a LEP about which it had particular concerns, and its system of ‘annual conversations’ with LEPs is not convincingly robust.’

The committee criticised the LEP for failing to comply with the standards of accountability and transparency expected from it.  

The report highlighted the committee’s concerns that the same problems could be ongoing at other LEPs given that the Government’s method for holding LEPs to account is not set in stone.

The committee urged the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to be more clear about the purpose of LEPs, given the complexity of the current local government structure within which they exist.

The report added: ‘The department’s policy review needs to make the role of LEPs absolutely clear, assess whether LEP boundaries are in the right place, evaluate their role in promoting economic growth and set out their place alongside new mayors and combined.’

The committee’s chair, Meg Hillier, said the GCGP LEP is proof of the committee’s ‘persistent concerns’ about the governance of LEPs and their accountability to the public.

She added: ‘The GCGP LEP failed to comply with the standards expected in public life. Yet there are also clear failings in oversight by central government.’

The committee also criticised the ministry’s ‘nuclear’ decision last year to withhold £37m from the GCGP LEP, adding it should have intervened in a less damaging way.

Last year, the GCGP and other LEPs were the subject of a National Audit Office (NAO) report which revealed widespread concerns.

In December, the GCGP LEP decided to give itself a ‘fresh start’ in 2018 by replacing the LEP with a new business board in April this year. The board will be directly linked to the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority.

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Governance Professional

North Yorkshire Council
£14.59 to £15.56 per hour
Typically, you will work with an allocation of schools within an agreed geographical area. Northallerton, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: North Yorkshire Council

Social Worker - Disabled Children's Team

North Yorkshire Council
£39,481 to £44,253 per annum
Our 0–18 Disabled Children’s Service takes a holistic and child-centred approach, working with a diverse range of children Northallerton, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: North Yorkshire Council

Social Worker - Disabled Children's Service

North Yorkshire Council
£39,481 to £44,253
As a Social Worker, you will build strong relationships with families and work in partnership with them across Child in Need (Section 17) Selby, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: North Yorkshire Council

Senior Education Adviser

North Yorkshire Council
£60,269 - £68 ,860 per annum
You will work with a wide variety of schools and settings including Local Authority maintained schools and academies. Northallerton, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: North Yorkshire Council

Practice Supervisor – Family Assessment and Support Team (FAST)

North Yorkshire Council
£48,738 - £53,051
We are looking for colleagues who can help us continue to offer a unique service and truly make a difference to the young people of our county. Scarborough, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: North Yorkshire Council
Linkedin Banner