Hiba Mahamadi 16 March 2018

Government oversight of LEPs not good enough, MPs say

The Public Accounts Committee has stressed its lack of faith in the Government’s overview of local enterprise partnerships in a critical report published today.

The report, on the Greater Cambridgeshire Greater Peterborough local enterprise partnership (GCGP LEP), concluded the Government’s claims last year that the LEP had no problems were ‘without substance’.

The report said: ‘The department’s oversight system failed to identify GCGP LEP as one which should have raised concerns.

‘The department has repeatedly given assurances to us that it has resolved issues in LEPs, but the case of GCGP LEP suggests that these assurances are without substance.

‘Moreover, the department did not flag GCGP as a LEP about which it had particular concerns, and its system of ‘annual conversations’ with LEPs is not convincingly robust.’

The committee criticised the LEP for failing to comply with the standards of accountability and transparency expected from it.  

The report highlighted the committee’s concerns that the same problems could be ongoing at other LEPs given that the Government’s method for holding LEPs to account is not set in stone.

The committee urged the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to be more clear about the purpose of LEPs, given the complexity of the current local government structure within which they exist.

The report added: ‘The department’s policy review needs to make the role of LEPs absolutely clear, assess whether LEP boundaries are in the right place, evaluate their role in promoting economic growth and set out their place alongside new mayors and combined.’

The committee’s chair, Meg Hillier, said the GCGP LEP is proof of the committee’s ‘persistent concerns’ about the governance of LEPs and their accountability to the public.

She added: ‘The GCGP LEP failed to comply with the standards expected in public life. Yet there are also clear failings in oversight by central government.’

The committee also criticised the ministry’s ‘nuclear’ decision last year to withhold £37m from the GCGP LEP, adding it should have intervened in a less damaging way.

Last year, the GCGP and other LEPs were the subject of a National Audit Office (NAO) report which revealed widespread concerns.

In December, the GCGP LEP decided to give itself a ‘fresh start’ in 2018 by replacing the LEP with a new business board in April this year. The board will be directly linked to the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority.

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Public Facilities Security Operative - Tendring

Essex County Council
Up to £12.6500 per hour
Public Facilities Security Operative - Tendring District Council Brightlingsea - Walton-on-the-Naze, Essex Part-Time, Temporary £12.65 PAYE / £16.22 U England, Essex, Clacton-On-Sea
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Head of Education and Early Years - Mid Essex

Essex County Council
£78438.0000 - £92279.0000 per annum
Head of Education and Early Years - Mid EssexPermanent, Full Time£78,438 to £92,279 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Adults Social Worker - North Essex (Expression of Interest)

Essex County Council
£38487 - £51834 per annum + Flexible Working, Hybrid Working
Adults Social Worker - North Essex (Expression of Interest)Permanent, Full Time£38,487 to £51,834 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

SEND Operations Partner

Essex County Council
£33915.0000 - £39900.0000 per annum
SEND Operations PartnerPermanent, Part Time£33,915 to £39,900 per annum (full time equivalent)Location
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Personal Facilitator - FTC till the 31st March 2028

Essex County Council
£25959.00 - £28621.00 per annum + Pro Rata
Personal FacilitatorFixed Term, Part Time£25,959 to £28,621 per annum, full time equivalentLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council
Linkedin Banner