Michael Burton 29 July 2020

Government handling of social care during pandemic attacked

MPs have delivered a blistering attack on the Government’s handling of social care during coronavirus.

They called it ‘slow, inconsistent and, at times, negligent’ and described the discharge of elderly patients from hospitals into care homes as an ‘appalling error'.

The MPs on the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) also blamed the ‘tragic impact’ of ‘years of inattention, funding cuts and delayed reforms to the sector’ leaving care as the ‘poor relation’ to the NHS during the pandemic.

In their report, the MPs criticised the lack of central direction over social care with responsibility spread across local authorities, Whitehall and providers.

They said the decision to discharge 25,000 patients into care homes in March and early April without testing for the virus was ‘shocking’ and an 'appalling error’ and said the pandemic exposed the ‘tragic impact’ of delaying social care reform.

The PAC has given the Government a deadline of October to outline in writing ‘what it will be doing, organisationally, legislatively and financially, and by when to make sure the needs of social care are given as much weight as those of the NHS in future'.

PAC chair Meg Hiller said: ‘The deaths of people in care homes devastated many, many families.

'They and we don’t have time for promises and slogans, or exercises in blame.

'We weren’t prepared for the first wave.

'Putting all else aside, government must use the narrow window we have now to plan for a second wave.

'Lives depend upon getting our response right.’

A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'Throughout this unprecedented global pandemic we have been working closely with the sector and public health experts to put in place guidance and support for adult social care.

'Alongside an extra £1.3bn to support the hospital discharge process, we have provided 172 million items of PPE to the social care sector since the start of the pandemic and are testing all residents and staff, including repeat testing for staff and residents in care homes for over 65 or those with dementia.'

Skills Pipelines: What local government needs to know image

Skills Pipelines: What local government needs to know

Councils and mayors are to be handed a central role in developing skills pipelines for local industries, as the Government unveils what it calls a ‘fundamental change’ to the education system aimed at tackling youth unemployment. Here's what council leaders and officers need to know.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Highways Supervisor

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£44982 - £54500
Job Title Highways Supervisor... Richmond
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Communication Support Worker

Durham County Council
£33,673 - £37,563 pro rata
Required – Temporary, grade 8, term time only plus 2 weeks.  8 hours per week until 31 August 2027. Are you looking or a role in school supporting th Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Outreach Workers

Durham County Council
Grade 6 £29,071 - £32,046
We are looking for enthusiastic and committed practitioners to join our Family Hub Teams supporting children and Families to deliver services in comm Peterlee
Recuriter: Durham County Council

School Admin Officer

Durham County Council
£26,403 - £28,598 pro rata (pay award pending)
Required to work term time only plus 2 weeks during summer holidays. 8am-4pm. Wingate Nursery School is looking for an exceptionally organised, warm, Wingate
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Cleaner

Durham County Council
£24,796 pro rata (pay award pending)
Required to work 12 hours per week, 05.30-08.00 or 15.30-18.00 Monday-Friday, Term Time plus 3 weeks to be worked during school holidays. We are seek Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner