William Eichler 04 May 2021

Electoral system ‘barrier to progressive change’, campaigners say

Electoral system ‘barrier to progressive change’, campaigners say  image

The current electoral system divides the vote for left and centre-left political parties and benefits the Conservative Party, democracy campaigners have found.

The research from the Politics for the Many campaign, using data collated by Democracy Club, has found that England's First Past the Post voting system means that progressive parties are at a disadvantage because there are more of them.

In nearly half of wards (48%), there is one unified 'right' party (the Conservatives) standing candidates against all three of the progressive 'left' parties (Labour/Liberal Democrats/Green).

There are a further 32% of wards where there is one 'right' party (always the Conservatives, apart from one ward in Derby where it is UKIP) standing candidates against two of the largest 'left' parties (either Labour, the Lib Dems or the Greens).

‘We’ve long known that the voting system is a barrier to progressive change. In an age of multi-party politics we’re still trying to make our two-party voting system work meaning voters are forced into tactical voting and supporting the “least worst option” to try and game the broken system,’ said Nancy Platts, coordinator of the Politics for the Many campaign.

‘But in the end we’re still often left with warped results that fail to reflect the views of voters. Despite voting for parties to the left of the Conservatives in the last 19 out of 20 General Elections we’ve seen a Conservative with majorities two-thirds of that time.

‘Labour must get serious about electoral reform to overcome the structural advantage our electoral system gives the Conservatives – only then will our politics accurately reflect the interests of ordinary votes.’

In 85% of wards, there are more 'left' parties standing candidates than 'right' parties. The figures reveal that out of around 5,000 council seats up for grabs, there are only eight wards in the whole of England (0.2% of wards) where all three 'right' parties are standing candidates.

There are zero wards where all three 'right' parties are standing candidates and only one 'left' party is standing candidates.

Black hole spending review image

Black hole spending review

Jonathan Werran, chief executive of Localis, reflects on what the Spending Review means for local government.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Procurement Manager

Essex County Council
£46388.0000 - £54573.0000 per annum
Procurement ManagerPermanent, Full Time£46,388 to £54,573 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Youth Officer (CDC)

City Of Doncaster Council
Grade 7, £27,259 - £29,955 (Pay award pending)
The City of Doncaster Council is a confident, ambitious organisation Doncaster, South Yorkshire
Recuriter: City Of Doncaster Council

Social Worker - Assessment & Intervention Mid Essex

Essex County Council
£37185.0000 - £50081.0000 per annum
Social Worker - Assessment & Intervention Mid EssexPermanent, Full Time£37,185 to £50,081 per annum Location
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Director – Housing Services

Redbridge London Borough Council
£Competitive
Are you ready to lead transformative housing services in one of London’s most ambitious and diverse boroughs? Redbridge, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Redbridge London Borough Council

Executive Director – Place, Communities and Enterprise

Redbridge London Borough Council
£Competitive
Are you ready to lead one of London’s most ambitious place-shaping agendas? Redbridge, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Redbridge London Borough Council
Linkedin Banner