William Eichler 06 November 2018

Disability benefit sanctions ‘arbitrarily punitive’, MPs say

The existing regime of benefit sanctions for those with disabilities or other health conditions is ‘arbitrarily punitive’ and needs reassessing, MPs have warned.

In 2012, the coalition Government introduced a series of conditions and sanctions on recipients of disability benefits in an effort to encourage more people with health conditions into work.

A new report into those sanctions, published by the Work and Pensions Committee, has said the effectiveness of sanctions is at best mixed and at worst counterproductive.

The committee said the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition ‘had little or no understanding of the likely impact of a tougher sanctions regime’ when they introduced it, and the current Government is ‘none the wiser.’

The report said that single parents, care leavers and people with a disability or health condition were ‘disproportionately vulnerable’ to the withdrawal of their benefit.

Until Whitehall could provide evidence that sanctions helped people into work, it cannot ‘justify these groups' continued inclusion in the sanctions regime.’

The Government should ‘immediately stop imposing conditionality and sanctions on anyone found to have limited capability for work, or who presents a valid doctor's note’ stating they cannot work,’ the committee said.

The report also noted that randomised Controlled Trials demonstrated that sanctions had no effect on in-work claimants' outcomes and that sanctioning people who are working is ‘too great a risk for too little return.’

‘We have heard stories of terrible and unnecessary hardship from people who’ve been sanctioned. They were left bewildered and driven to despair at becoming, often with their children, the victims of a sanctions regime that is at times so counter-productive it just seems pointlessly cruel,’ said the committee chair Frank Field MP.

‘While none of them told us that there should be no benefit sanctions at all, it can only be right for the Government to take a long hard look at what is going on.

‘If their stories were rare it would be unacceptable, but the Government has no idea how many more people out there are suffering in similar circumstances.’

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Senior/Principal Regeneration Officer

Fareham Borough Council
£45,465 - £55,379
Our town centre regeneration is moving from planning to delivery, and we're looking for someone who wants to help make regeneration happen. Fareham, Hampshire
Recuriter: Fareham Borough Council

Fostering Social Worker

Gloucestershire County Council
£40,444 - £48,738 per annum (pro rata for part-time staff)
This marks an important step in our journey to improve outcomes for our children and young people Gloucestershire
Recuriter: Gloucestershire County Council

Family Help Team Leader (SW)

Gloucestershire County Council
£49,817 - £53,051 per annum
This marks an important step in our journey to improve outcomes for our children and young people Gloucestershire
Recuriter: Gloucestershire County Council

Repairs Operations Manager

Royal Borough of Greenwich
P09 - £71,181 - £74,802
You'll be responsible for leading the delivery of a high-performing, resident-focused repairs service London (Greater)
Recuriter: Royal Borough of Greenwich

Partnership Officer

Royal Borough of Greenwich
PO3 (£45,750 - £49,056) Pay award pending
We are looking for a Partnerships Officer who will sit within one of our Innovation and Improvement teams London (Greater)
Recuriter: Royal Borough of Greenwich
Linkedin Banner