William Eichler 27 February 2025

Data protection regulator reprimands Glasgow and Edinburgh

Data protection regulator reprimands Glasgow and Edinburgh image
Image: CL STOCK / Shutterstock.com.

The regulator for data protection has criticised Glasgow and Edinburgh city councils for failing to respond to requests for personal information on time.

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) said the two councils have ‘repeatedly’ failed to respond to subject access requests (SARs) within the legal timeframe.

Councils in Scotland saw a 67% increase in the number of SARs between 2021 and 2024. This was partly due to the Redress Scotland scheme where people who suffered abuse in care can apply for redress using documents such as care records.

Despite this increase, the regulator found that 75% of Scottish councils improved their SAR compliance, with 13 reporting a compliance rate of 90% in 2023/24.

However, the ICO launched investigations into Glasgow City Council and City of Edinburgh Council after it did not see any improvements over 12 months.

An audit of Glasgow found that the council has good policies and procedures in place to handle SARs, but lacked the necessary resources.

Jenny Brotchie, acting head of Scottish Affairs at the ICO, said: ‘We expect all local authorities to have sufficient resources in place to handle the volume and complexity of SARs, and to keep people updated on the progress of their request.’

A spokesperson for Glasgow City Council said that since the Redress Scotland scheme was introduced the local authority has faced a 350% increase in SARs.

‘Despite this, we are managing to respond within the statutory timescales to roughly half of the requests we receive each month,’ they said.

Cllr Jane Meagher, the leader of City of Edinburgh Council, said the local authority had committed ‘substantial time, money and effort’ to improving response times.

‘This has started to pay dividends, with compliance rates showing sustained improvement throughout 2024 and reaching 89% for cases due in January 2025.’

Brotchie added: ‘We are taking a proportionate approach to monitoring local authorities, but these reprimands show that we will not hesitate to take enforcement action where necessary.’

Mapping successful 15-minute cities image

Mapping successful 15-minute cities

Is GIS the difference between success and failure for 15-minute neighbourhoods? Alex Zirpolo, principal GIS consultant at Lanpro, argues it is.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Family Support Worker

Durham County Council
Grade 6 £27,269 - £30,060
Are you passionate about Early Help and Prevention work? Do you want to work in an ambitious Local Authority with strong leadership and partnership c Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Residential Worker

Durham County Council
Grade 7 £29,093 - £32,654
Salary
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Team Leader

Durham County Council
Grade 8 £31,586 - £35,235
Salary
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Area Principal Educational Psychologist

Durham County Council
£65,432 - £69,399 Soulbury Scale B 8-11 (plus SPA points up to £73,412)
We are looking for an experienced Educational Psychologist with good interpersonal and communication skills who is ready to step up into a Senior Educ Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Enhanced Teaching Assistant

Durham County Council
£25,584 - £27,711 Pro-rata
Enhanced Teaching Assistant Grade 5   £25,584 - £27,711 Pro-rata Part Time 16.25hrs per week, Term Time only + 2 Weeks Permanent Required from 1.9.25 Newton Aycliffe
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner