William Eichler 27 February 2025

Data protection regulator reprimands Glasgow and Edinburgh

Data protection regulator reprimands Glasgow and Edinburgh image
Image: CL STOCK / Shutterstock.com.

The regulator for data protection has criticised Glasgow and Edinburgh city councils for failing to respond to requests for personal information on time.

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) said the two councils have ‘repeatedly’ failed to respond to subject access requests (SARs) within the legal timeframe.

Councils in Scotland saw a 67% increase in the number of SARs between 2021 and 2024. This was partly due to the Redress Scotland scheme where people who suffered abuse in care can apply for redress using documents such as care records.

Despite this increase, the regulator found that 75% of Scottish councils improved their SAR compliance, with 13 reporting a compliance rate of 90% in 2023/24.

However, the ICO launched investigations into Glasgow City Council and City of Edinburgh Council after it did not see any improvements over 12 months.

An audit of Glasgow found that the council has good policies and procedures in place to handle SARs, but lacked the necessary resources.

Jenny Brotchie, acting head of Scottish Affairs at the ICO, said: ‘We expect all local authorities to have sufficient resources in place to handle the volume and complexity of SARs, and to keep people updated on the progress of their request.’

A spokesperson for Glasgow City Council said that since the Redress Scotland scheme was introduced the local authority has faced a 350% increase in SARs.

‘Despite this, we are managing to respond within the statutory timescales to roughly half of the requests we receive each month,’ they said.

Cllr Jane Meagher, the leader of City of Edinburgh Council, said the local authority had committed ‘substantial time, money and effort’ to improving response times.

‘This has started to pay dividends, with compliance rates showing sustained improvement throughout 2024 and reaching 89% for cases due in January 2025.’

Brotchie added: ‘We are taking a proportionate approach to monitoring local authorities, but these reprimands show that we will not hesitate to take enforcement action where necessary.’

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

LADO Operation Manager

The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council
Up to £53076 per annum
Lead the safeguarding response that protects children and young people across two boroughs. As the LADO Operations Manager for Kensington and Chelsea England, London
Recuriter: The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council

Community Connector (Mid)

Essex County Council
£27665.00 - £32546.00 per annum
Community Connector (Mid)Fixed Term, Full Time£27,665 to £32,546.00 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Youth Violence Reduction Team Manager

The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council
Up to £53076 per annum
Lead a specialist team reducing violent harm and supporting young people to find safer, positive paths forward. As our Youth Violence Service Team Man England, London
Recuriter: The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council

Engineer (Highways Assets)

The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council
Up to £44937 per annum
Help maintain and protect the borough's highways, bridges and drainage systems - keeping our streets safe and connected every dayHelp maintain and pro England, London
Recuriter: The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council

Quality and Improvement Officers

Durham County Council
Grade 8 £32,597 - £36,363 p.a.
A vacancy has arisen within the Property Partnerships and Innovation team for two full time permanent Quality and Improvement Officers.   WHAT IS INVO Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner