William Eichler 27 February 2025

Data protection regulator reprimands Glasgow and Edinburgh

Data protection regulator reprimands Glasgow and Edinburgh image
Image: CL STOCK / Shutterstock.com.

The regulator for data protection has criticised Glasgow and Edinburgh city councils for failing to respond to requests for personal information on time.

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) said the two councils have ‘repeatedly’ failed to respond to subject access requests (SARs) within the legal timeframe.

Councils in Scotland saw a 67% increase in the number of SARs between 2021 and 2024. This was partly due to the Redress Scotland scheme where people who suffered abuse in care can apply for redress using documents such as care records.

Despite this increase, the regulator found that 75% of Scottish councils improved their SAR compliance, with 13 reporting a compliance rate of 90% in 2023/24.

However, the ICO launched investigations into Glasgow City Council and City of Edinburgh Council after it did not see any improvements over 12 months.

An audit of Glasgow found that the council has good policies and procedures in place to handle SARs, but lacked the necessary resources.

Jenny Brotchie, acting head of Scottish Affairs at the ICO, said: ‘We expect all local authorities to have sufficient resources in place to handle the volume and complexity of SARs, and to keep people updated on the progress of their request.’

A spokesperson for Glasgow City Council said that since the Redress Scotland scheme was introduced the local authority has faced a 350% increase in SARs.

‘Despite this, we are managing to respond within the statutory timescales to roughly half of the requests we receive each month,’ they said.

Cllr Jane Meagher, the leader of City of Edinburgh Council, said the local authority had committed ‘substantial time, money and effort’ to improving response times.

‘This has started to pay dividends, with compliance rates showing sustained improvement throughout 2024 and reaching 89% for cases due in January 2025.’

Brotchie added: ‘We are taking a proportionate approach to monitoring local authorities, but these reprimands show that we will not hesitate to take enforcement action where necessary.’

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Project Support Officers

Durham County Council
Grade 10 £38,220 - £41,771
Two exciting Project Support Officer – SEND opportunities have arisen within our Home to School Transport team. One role is permanent and the other a Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Cleaner

Durham County Council
£24,796 pro rata
Cleaner Grade 1 £24,796 pro rata 12.5 hours per week, whole time Permanent Required as soon as possible The children, staff, and governors of Chester Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Class Teacher

Durham County Council
£37,101 - £45,352
Class Teacher  M3-M6 £37,101 - £45,352 Full Time, Whole Time Temporary – required to cover maternity leave from Monday 5th January 2026 until the date Newton Aycliffe
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Lunchtime Supervisor

Durham County Council
£24,796 pro rata
Lunchtime Supervisor Grade 1  £24,796 pro rata 6.25 hours per week, term time only Permanent Required as soon as possible  The Governors of St Oswald Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Lunchtime Supervisor

Durham County Council
£24,796 part-time pro-rata
Lunchtime Supervisor Grade 1 £24,796 part-time pro-rata 6.25 hours per week, term time only Permanent Required from Monday 10th November (or as close Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner