William Eichler 27 February 2025

Data protection regulator reprimands Glasgow and Edinburgh

Data protection regulator reprimands Glasgow and Edinburgh image
Image: CL STOCK / Shutterstock.com.

The regulator for data protection has criticised Glasgow and Edinburgh city councils for failing to respond to requests for personal information on time.

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) said the two councils have ‘repeatedly’ failed to respond to subject access requests (SARs) within the legal timeframe.

Councils in Scotland saw a 67% increase in the number of SARs between 2021 and 2024. This was partly due to the Redress Scotland scheme where people who suffered abuse in care can apply for redress using documents such as care records.

Despite this increase, the regulator found that 75% of Scottish councils improved their SAR compliance, with 13 reporting a compliance rate of 90% in 2023/24.

However, the ICO launched investigations into Glasgow City Council and City of Edinburgh Council after it did not see any improvements over 12 months.

An audit of Glasgow found that the council has good policies and procedures in place to handle SARs, but lacked the necessary resources.

Jenny Brotchie, acting head of Scottish Affairs at the ICO, said: ‘We expect all local authorities to have sufficient resources in place to handle the volume and complexity of SARs, and to keep people updated on the progress of their request.’

A spokesperson for Glasgow City Council said that since the Redress Scotland scheme was introduced the local authority has faced a 350% increase in SARs.

‘Despite this, we are managing to respond within the statutory timescales to roughly half of the requests we receive each month,’ they said.

Cllr Jane Meagher, the leader of City of Edinburgh Council, said the local authority had committed ‘substantial time, money and effort’ to improving response times.

‘This has started to pay dividends, with compliance rates showing sustained improvement throughout 2024 and reaching 89% for cases due in January 2025.’

Brotchie added: ‘We are taking a proportionate approach to monitoring local authorities, but these reprimands show that we will not hesitate to take enforcement action where necessary.’

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Senior Social Worker

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£46,206 - £55,992
Senior Social Worker
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Waste Operations Support Officers

Durham County Council
£29,071 - £32,046
Temporary until 1 June 2029   Refuse and Recycling are looking for 3 Waste Operations Support Officer to work in the South and East of County Durham. Peterlee
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Recovery Worker

Durham County Council
Grade 7 - £31,015 – £34,811 per annum.
Do you want to make a real difference to the lives of people experiencing hoarding and self-neglect behaviours?   As an Agile Recovery Worker within o Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Finance Officer

Durham County Council
Grade 7, £30,024 - £33,699 per annum. Pay award pending.
We are seeking a Finance Officer to join DurhamLearn, where you will play a key role in supporting the financial administration, budget monitoring and Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Social Work Consultant

Durham County Council
Grade 13 - £47,181 - £51,356 (Pay Award Pending)
Do you believe every child deserves to grow up feeling loved, safe, and supported, with a lasting sense of family, belonging, and stability?   Are you Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner