William Eichler 27 February 2025

Data protection regulator reprimands Glasgow and Edinburgh

Data protection regulator reprimands Glasgow and Edinburgh image
Image: CL STOCK / Shutterstock.com.

The regulator for data protection has criticised Glasgow and Edinburgh city councils for failing to respond to requests for personal information on time.

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) said the two councils have ‘repeatedly’ failed to respond to subject access requests (SARs) within the legal timeframe.

Councils in Scotland saw a 67% increase in the number of SARs between 2021 and 2024. This was partly due to the Redress Scotland scheme where people who suffered abuse in care can apply for redress using documents such as care records.

Despite this increase, the regulator found that 75% of Scottish councils improved their SAR compliance, with 13 reporting a compliance rate of 90% in 2023/24.

However, the ICO launched investigations into Glasgow City Council and City of Edinburgh Council after it did not see any improvements over 12 months.

An audit of Glasgow found that the council has good policies and procedures in place to handle SARs, but lacked the necessary resources.

Jenny Brotchie, acting head of Scottish Affairs at the ICO, said: ‘We expect all local authorities to have sufficient resources in place to handle the volume and complexity of SARs, and to keep people updated on the progress of their request.’

A spokesperson for Glasgow City Council said that since the Redress Scotland scheme was introduced the local authority has faced a 350% increase in SARs.

‘Despite this, we are managing to respond within the statutory timescales to roughly half of the requests we receive each month,’ they said.

Cllr Jane Meagher, the leader of City of Edinburgh Council, said the local authority had committed ‘substantial time, money and effort’ to improving response times.

‘This has started to pay dividends, with compliance rates showing sustained improvement throughout 2024 and reaching 89% for cases due in January 2025.’

Brotchie added: ‘We are taking a proportionate approach to monitoring local authorities, but these reprimands show that we will not hesitate to take enforcement action where necessary.’

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Educational Psychologist - Main Grade

Essex County Council
£43483.0000 - £63394.0000 per annum
Educational Psychologist - Main GradePermanent, Full TimeSoulbury Psychologists Scale A from 3 to 8 plus SPA opportunityLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Assistant Director of Family Services & Strategic Partnerships

North Northamptonshire Council
£97,632 - £108,033
Creating Brighter Futures – Where Leadership Sparks Magic North Northamptonshire
Recuriter: North Northamptonshire Council

Assistant Director – Education, SEND and Inclusion

North Northamptonshire Council
£97,632 - £108,033
Creating Brighter Futures – Where Leadership Sparks Magic North Northamptonshire
Recuriter: North Northamptonshire Council

Casual Front Of House and Events Assistant

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
Salary From £14.28- £18.85 Depending on Skills,
Job Title
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Contracts Officer

Durham County Council
Grade 7 £30,024 to £33,699 per annum
We are looking for an individual who has excellent customer service skills to join the team for a period of 12 months. WHAT IS INVOLVED? You will be Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner