Laura Sharman 14 January 2021

Councils warned not to adopt allocations criteria that disadvantage domestic abuse victims

Councils warned not to adopt allocations criteria that disadvantage domestic abuse victims image

The ombudsman has reminded councils to consider the exceptional circumstances of people fleeing domestic abuse when assessing their housing needs.

The warning comes from the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman following an investigation into the way Wandsworth LBC assessed a woman after she left another London borough to escape an abusive partner.

It found the council did not consider relaxing its local area connection criterion when the single mother asked for help, even though her former partner - who was in custody at the time - had pleaded guilty to aggravated bodily harm and criminal damage.

The ombudsman found the council should have offered the woman interim accommodation and accepted it had a duty to rehouse her.

Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, Michael King, said: ‘Statutory guidance says councils should not adopt allocations criteria that disadvantage people fleeing an area because of domestic violence. This has also been extended to people who have recently arrived in an area because of domestic violence.

’In this case, the woman had suffered a brutal assault and the council’s failures meant she continued to live in an area where she was at risk of violence. The council did nothing to help her find safe, alternative accommodation, even when it knew her ex-partner would be released from prison, leaving her frightened and at ongoing risk.’

The ombudsman has called on the council to provide suitable temporary accommodation, put her in Band A of its allocations scheme backdated to October 2018, and provide information to housing officers about its duties towards people fleeing domestic violence.

A statement from the council said: 'We accept the ombudsman’s findings and have apologised to the complainant, agreed to pay her a sum in compensation and place her in the correct category of housing need. This was a highly complex case with some unique features but we welcome the review for providing us with important lessons in how we can improve our services in such circumstances.

'We have certainly taken these lessons on board, tightened our working practices and procedures and are working hard to ensure a situation like this does not happen again.'

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Team Support Officer

Royal Borough of Greenwich
Scale 5 - £32,535 to £33,987
The right person will work closely with both Team Leaders for Self-Directed Support (Finance & Systems and Advice & Recruitment) Greenwich, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Royal Borough of Greenwich

Local Authority Research Practitioner

Royal Borough of Greenwich
PO4 - £49,056 to £52,194
Greenwich is a great place to work. Greenwich, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Royal Borough of Greenwich

SEN Team Manager

London Borough of Bromley
MG6 Circa £60-65k
London Borough of Bromley Council is working hard to do things differently in SEND Bromley (City/Town), London (Greater)
Recuriter: London Borough of Bromley

Social Worker - Children In Care

North East Lincolnshire Council
Salary from ASYE level £36,363 up to £46,142
A service built on passion, pride and togetherness North East Lincolnshire
Recuriter: North East Lincolnshire Council

Pupil and Young Person Supervisor

North East Lincolnshire Council
NJC – point 2 FTE salary – £23,656
Lisle Marsden Church of England Primary Academy wishes to recruit a high-quality Pupil and Young Pupil Supervisors North East Lincolnshire
Recuriter: North East Lincolnshire Council
Linkedin Banner