William Eichler 21 February 2017

Benefit sanctions applied ‘inconsistently’, MPs warn

Benefit sanctions have increased in ‘severity’ and are applied ‘inconsistently’, MPs say – and the Government doesn’t know why.

A new Public Accounts Committee (PAC) report into the use of benefit sanctions has revealed jobcentres and providers use them ‘inconsistently’, with some Work Programme providers referring twice as many people for sanctions as others in the same area.

It also found the ‘severity’ of sanctions - a reduction or suspension of payments because a claimant has not met conditions for receiving benefit - had increased in recent years with sometimes serious consequences.

The committee acknowledged that sanctions can help encourage people into work, but it warned the Department for Work & Pensions had ‘poor data’ with which to evaluate what works and is unable to estimate the wider impact of sanctions.

It also does not know their overall cost or benefit to the public purse or whether vulnerable claimants are receiving the protection they are entitled to.

‘Benefit sanctions have been used as a blunt instrument by Government,’ said PAC chair Meg Hillier.

‘It is an article of faith for the Department for Work & Pensions that sanctions encourage people into work. The reality is far more complex and the potential consequences severe.

‘Sanctions and exemptions are being applied inconsistently, with little understanding of why.’

Ms Hillier warned that sanctioning people can lead to increased pressures on other services and called for a more ‘nuanced’ approach.

‘Some people who receive sanctions stop claiming without finding work, adding to pressures on other services,’ she said.

‘Suspending people’s benefit payments can lead them into debt, rent arrears and homelessness, which can undermine their efforts to find work.

‘A third of people surveyed by the charity Crisis who were claiming Housing Benefit had this stopped in error because of a sanction – an appalling situation to be faced with. ‘All of this highlights the need for a far more nuanced approach to sanctioning claimants, with meaningful measures in place to monitor its effectiveness.’

‘As a priority the Government must make better use of data and evidence from the frontline to improve its understanding of what best supports both claimants and the interests of taxpayers in general,’ she added.

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Family Worker (Link Role)

Essex County Council
£31931.00 - £36423.00 per annum + + 26 Days Leave & Local Gov Pension
Family Worker (Link Role)Permanent, Full Time£31,931 to £36,423 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Assistant Manager

Wakefield Council
£42,839 to £46,142, Grade 10.
We have fantastic opportunity available for a Residential Children’s Home Assistant Manager. Wakefield, West Yorkshire
Recuriter: Wakefield Council

Council Tax Officers - North Lincolnshire Council

North East Lincolnshire Council
Grade 6 - £16,765 to £18,501 per year
You will be working as part of the Local Taxation and Benefits Shared Service North East Lincolnshire
Recuriter: North East Lincolnshire Council

Electoral Services Officer

North East Lincolnshire Council
NJC15 - £30,024
Are you ready to play a key role in shaping democracy while thriving in a fast-paced, data-driven environment? North East Lincolnshire
Recuriter: North East Lincolnshire Council

Family Support Worker

North East Lincolnshire Council
NJC 19 - £32,061
Are you committed to improving outcomes for our Young People? North East Lincolnshire
Recuriter: North East Lincolnshire Council
Linkedin Banner