William Eichler 04 November 2019

Two-child benefit limit ‘crude’ and should be abolished, MPs say

MPs have called on the Government to lift the two-child limit and return to providing support for all children through the benefits system.

Families are not able to claim child benefits for any third or subsequent child born on or after 6 April 2017 under the Government’s two-child limit on benefits.

The Government argues that the policy means families claiming benefits will face the same financial choices about having children as families who are supporting themselves solely through work.

However, a new report from the Commons Work and Pensions Committee has concluded that the limit ‘fails to achieve the Government's own objectives’ and has consequences that ‘no Government should be willing to accept’.

The policy assumes that all pregnancies are planned and in full knowledge of the Government's social security policy, assumptions which ‘do not hold true’, according to the committee.

The committee also said that the distinction between families on benefits and those who are working is ‘crude and unrealistic’. The Government’s own statistics reveal that no such simple distinction exists.

As of April 2019, 72% of families receiving tax credits were working families, while 28% of working age housing benefit claimants are ‘in employment and not on passported benefit’. As of September 2019, 33% of universal credit claimants were recorded as in employment.

The Government also argues that the two-child limit might encourage parents to increase their incomes from work.

However, the committee says that this is not supported by the evidence. Instead the lack of affordable childcare and transport costs means that parents cannot increase their working hours to compensate for losses. ‘Any family in this country, except the super-rich, could fall foul of the two-child limit if their circumstances changed for the worse,’ said Frank Field, chair of the committee.

‘This is exactly why social security must act as a national insurance scheme covering people when they’re most exposed to hardship – not increase it.’

A spokesperson for the Department for Work & Pensions said: ‘This policy ensures fairness by asking families getting benefits to make the same financial choices as people who support themselves solely through work, and there are exemptions and safeguards in place.’

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Structures Manager

South Gloucestershire Council
£50,269 - £53,460
As the Structures Manager, you will lead the management and maintenance of our highway and open space Gloucester, Gloucestershire
Recuriter: South Gloucestershire Council

SEND Operations Assistant

Essex County Council
£25081.00 - £26679.00 per annum
SEND Operations AssistantFixed Term, Part Time£25,081 to £26,679 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Access to Information Assistant

Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman
£30,253 to £36,117 per annum
Are you passionate about transparency and accountability? Coventry, West Midlands
Recuriter: Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman

Engagement Officer

Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman
£32,780 to £37,069 per annum
This is an exciting new role within our organisation. Coventry, West Midlands
Recuriter: Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman

Human Resources Officer

Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman
£40,565 - £44,780
The HR Officer role is an exciting role within the HR team, supporting the delivery of the employee experience at LGSCO. Coventry, West Midlands
Recuriter: Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman
Linkedin Banner