William Eichler 04 November 2019

Two-child benefit limit ‘crude’ and should be abolished, MPs say

MPs have called on the Government to lift the two-child limit and return to providing support for all children through the benefits system.

Families are not able to claim child benefits for any third or subsequent child born on or after 6 April 2017 under the Government’s two-child limit on benefits.

The Government argues that the policy means families claiming benefits will face the same financial choices about having children as families who are supporting themselves solely through work.

However, a new report from the Commons Work and Pensions Committee has concluded that the limit ‘fails to achieve the Government's own objectives’ and has consequences that ‘no Government should be willing to accept’.

The policy assumes that all pregnancies are planned and in full knowledge of the Government's social security policy, assumptions which ‘do not hold true’, according to the committee.

The committee also said that the distinction between families on benefits and those who are working is ‘crude and unrealistic’. The Government’s own statistics reveal that no such simple distinction exists.

As of April 2019, 72% of families receiving tax credits were working families, while 28% of working age housing benefit claimants are ‘in employment and not on passported benefit’. As of September 2019, 33% of universal credit claimants were recorded as in employment.

The Government also argues that the two-child limit might encourage parents to increase their incomes from work.

However, the committee says that this is not supported by the evidence. Instead the lack of affordable childcare and transport costs means that parents cannot increase their working hours to compensate for losses. ‘Any family in this country, except the super-rich, could fall foul of the two-child limit if their circumstances changed for the worse,’ said Frank Field, chair of the committee.

‘This is exactly why social security must act as a national insurance scheme covering people when they’re most exposed to hardship – not increase it.’

A spokesperson for the Department for Work & Pensions said: ‘This policy ensures fairness by asking families getting benefits to make the same financial choices as people who support themselves solely through work, and there are exemptions and safeguards in place.’

Devolution and putting place first image

Devolution and putting place first

The real lesson of Andy Burnham's Makerfield success, argues Dr Jonathan Carr-West, is that place – not personality – is the key to Britain's future.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Senior Practitioner - Children in Care - North Essex

Essex County Council
£48205.0000 - £57988.0000 per annum
Senior Practitioner - Children in Care - North EssexPermanent, Full Time£48,205 to £57,988 Per AnnumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Coroners Coordinator

Essex County Council
£25959.0000 - £26632.0000 per annum
Coroners CoordinatorPermanent, Full Time£25,959 to £26,632 per annum Location
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Adults Social Worker - Discharge to Assess

Essex County Council
£38487 - £51834 per annum
Interviews will be held in person at Rowan House, Colchester in late July 2026.This advert is open to Experienced Qualified Social Worker's About Our England, Essex, Colchester
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Senior Organisational Development Adviser

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
43545 - 55992
Job Title
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

School Crossing Patroller

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
Pro Rata Salary - £5353,77
Job Title
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
Linkedin Banner