William Eichler Monday, November 4, 2019

Two-child benefit limit ‘crude’ and should be abolished, MPs say

MPs have called on the Government to lift the two-child limit and return to providing support for all children through the benefits system.

Families are not able to claim child benefits for any third or subsequent child born on or after 6 April 2017 under the Government’s two-child limit on benefits.

The Government argues that the policy means families claiming benefits will face the same financial choices about having children as families who are supporting themselves solely through work.

However, a new report from the Commons Work and Pensions Committee has concluded that the limit ‘fails to achieve the Government's own objectives’ and has consequences that ‘no Government should be willing to accept’.

The policy assumes that all pregnancies are planned and in full knowledge of the Government's social security policy, assumptions which ‘do not hold true’, according to the committee.

The committee also said that the distinction between families on benefits and those who are working is ‘crude and unrealistic’. The Government’s own statistics reveal that no such simple distinction exists.

As of April 2019, 72% of families receiving tax credits were working families, while 28% of working age housing benefit claimants are ‘in employment and not on passported benefit’. As of September 2019, 33% of universal credit claimants were recorded as in employment.

The Government also argues that the two-child limit might encourage parents to increase their incomes from work.

However, the committee says that this is not supported by the evidence. Instead the lack of affordable childcare and transport costs means that parents cannot increase their working hours to compensate for losses. ‘Any family in this country, except the super-rich, could fall foul of the two-child limit if their circumstances changed for the worse,’ said Frank Field, chair of the committee.

‘This is exactly why social security must act as a national insurance scheme covering people when they’re most exposed to hardship – not increase it.’

A spokesperson for the Department for Work & Pensions said: ‘This policy ensures fairness by asking families getting benefits to make the same financial choices as people who support themselves solely through work, and there are exemptions and safeguards in place.’

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Team Manager - DBIT Core Service, North Essex

Essex County Council
£55892.0000 - £69241.0000 per annum
Team Manager - DBIT Core Service, North EssexFixed Term, Full Time£55,892 to £69,241 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Social Worker

Durham County Council
Grade 9 - £35,412 - £39,152 (pre-progression) / Grade 11 - £40,777 - £45,091 (post-progression) - Pay Award Pending
We are looking for a social worker who has completed their assessed and supported year in employment to join our Children in Care teams. In this role Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Service Manager – Child Protection and Allegations Management

Durham County Council
£56,554 - £60,680 - Grade 16
We are looking for a Service Manager to lead our newly created Child Protection and Allegations Management Service. This is a brand-new leadership rol Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Business Rates Officer

Durham County Council
£26,403 to £28,598 p.a. (Grade 5) pay award pending
Do you have experience of dealing with members of the public in a caring and responsive manner?  Do you have good organisational, numerical and time m Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Assessment and Awards Officer

Durham County Council
£26,403 to £28,598 p.a. (Grade 5) pay award pending
Do you have experience of dealing with members of the public in a caring and responsive manner?  Do you have good organisational, numerical and time m Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner