William Eichler 04 November 2019

Two-child benefit limit ‘crude’ and should be abolished, MPs say

MPs have called on the Government to lift the two-child limit and return to providing support for all children through the benefits system.

Families are not able to claim child benefits for any third or subsequent child born on or after 6 April 2017 under the Government’s two-child limit on benefits.

The Government argues that the policy means families claiming benefits will face the same financial choices about having children as families who are supporting themselves solely through work.

However, a new report from the Commons Work and Pensions Committee has concluded that the limit ‘fails to achieve the Government's own objectives’ and has consequences that ‘no Government should be willing to accept’.

The policy assumes that all pregnancies are planned and in full knowledge of the Government's social security policy, assumptions which ‘do not hold true’, according to the committee.

The committee also said that the distinction between families on benefits and those who are working is ‘crude and unrealistic’. The Government’s own statistics reveal that no such simple distinction exists.

As of April 2019, 72% of families receiving tax credits were working families, while 28% of working age housing benefit claimants are ‘in employment and not on passported benefit’. As of September 2019, 33% of universal credit claimants were recorded as in employment.

The Government also argues that the two-child limit might encourage parents to increase their incomes from work.

However, the committee says that this is not supported by the evidence. Instead the lack of affordable childcare and transport costs means that parents cannot increase their working hours to compensate for losses. ‘Any family in this country, except the super-rich, could fall foul of the two-child limit if their circumstances changed for the worse,’ said Frank Field, chair of the committee.

‘This is exactly why social security must act as a national insurance scheme covering people when they’re most exposed to hardship – not increase it.’

A spokesperson for the Department for Work & Pensions said: ‘This policy ensures fairness by asking families getting benefits to make the same financial choices as people who support themselves solely through work, and there are exemptions and safeguards in place.’

LocalGov Weekly Round Up image

LocalGov Weekly Round Up

William Eichler, editor of LocalGov.co.uk, reflects on the stories that captured readers’ attention this week.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Ceremonies Co-ordinator

North Yorkshire Council
£27,254- £29,064
Are you a ‘people person’ looking for a role where you can engage with members of the public? Harrogate, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: North Yorkshire Council

Health and Fitness Co-ordinator

North Yorkshire Council
£34,434 to £38,220 per annum
We are seeking enthusiastic and proactive Health & Fitness Co‑ordinators North Yorkshire / various / hybrid
Recuriter: North Yorkshire Council

Residential Assistant - ASC

Essex County Council
£25081.0000 - £25395.0000 per annum
Residential Assistant - ASCPermanent, Part Time£25,081 up to £25,395 per annum Location
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Highways Officer

North Yorkshire Council
£34,434 - £38,220 per annum
Are you interested in joining our friendly and welcoming Area 5 Highways team Skipton, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: North Yorkshire Council

Registrar

North Yorkshire Council
£29,064 - £34,434
As a Registrar, you’ll play an essential role within North Yorkshire’s Registration Service Selby, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: North Yorkshire Council
Linkedin Banner