16 February 2007

Transport: Ministers rule out special treatment for for rural buses

The Government has ducked calls for quality bus contracts to be made easier to draw up outside England’s largest conurbations. In answer to the transport select committee’s push for the forthcoming Road Transport Bill to remove obstacles to establishing quality bus contracts in the shires, the Government replied: ‘Quality contracts will remain as available to rural areas as to a passenger transport authority.’ This failed to provide the commitment to reversing the 1986 bus deregulation outside the big conurbations such as Manchester and Birmingham that the MPs had sought. The committee had found ‘no reason’ why quality contracts should not be used to secure socially-necessary rural bus services, as well as improving urban services. The County Surveyors’ Society said it would be unfair to only make franchising easier for the passenger transport executives, and even detrimental for the shires next to the major conurbations. The response comes despite transport secretary Douglas Alexander’s declared aim at a recent transport conference ‘to exploit the full potential of the bus in every part of our country’. The December policy paper Putting passengers first stresses that ‘one size does not fit all’. Bob Saxby, chair of the Association of Transport Co-ordinating Officers, who is on the working group drawing up the proposals, told Surveyor: ‘I will be emphasising that there can be circumstances where a quality contract might be the only way of providing an efficient rural network. ‘This will be much simpler animal than an urban QC, since most services are already tendered – it merely needs to ensure that no cherry-picked services are registered.’ The Government also revealed more details on the forthcoming draft legislation to allow contracts to be introduced where this is in the public interest, due to be published in spring. Quality contracts would no longer have to be rubber-stamped by the secretary of state, but would instead need to be assessed by a panel of experts. Longer time limits on contract durations could also be allowed, ‘improving the conditions for operators to invest and innovate’. The introduction of franchising is likely to be phased – the DfT ‘does not want to see local authorities introducing a quality contracts scheme for the whole of an urban area under one contract, but rather let contracts for smaller parts of networks’. This would encourage greater competition and bids from small as well as large operators, it claimed. • Bus services across the UK: Government response. : www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmtran.htm
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Youth Support Worker in Training

Essex County Council
£25580.00 - £26924.00 per annum + + 26 Days Leave & local Gov Pension
Youth Support Worker in TrainingPermanent, Full Time£25,580 to £26,924 per annum plus an Outer Fringe allowance of £954 paLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Community Support Worker

Essex County Council
£25395.00 - £32131.00 per annum + + 26 Days Leave & Local Gov Pension
Community Support WorkerPermanent, Full Time£25,395 to £32,131 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Assistant Director – Public Health (Partnerships & Commissioning)

Leicestershire County Council
£98,673 - £111,60
You will report to our Director of Public Health who is a chief officer of the council reporting to the Chief Executive Leicestershire
Recuriter: Leicestershire County Council

District Youth & Community Worker in Training

Essex County Council
£29606.00 - £36837.00 per annum + Per Annum
District Youth & Community Worker in TrainingPermanent, Full TimeFrom £29,606 to £36,837 per annum depending on experience, plus an Outer Fringe allow England, Essex, Harlow
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Senior Youth Worker (South and Vale)

Oxfordshire County Council
£38220 - £40777
Are you passionate about making a diffe... Oxfordshire
Recuriter: Oxfordshire County Council
Linkedin Banner