Simon Parker 03 September 2013

Soapbox by Simon Parker

Local government has rediscovered its commercial expertise since 2010.  Now it’s time to turn those skills to one of the biggest economic challenges the country faces: housebuilding.

The problem is well-rehearsed.  New homes provide a significant boost to the economy by providing jobs and reducing the cost of living for workers.  But rather than get on with the business of building, developers are sitting on vast tracts of land waiting for an upturn so that they can achieve the 30% margins the market expects of them.

The losers are young people struggling to get on the housing ladder and communities who increasingly are seeing fewer social benefits from new development.

The economics of the matter for the big companies is simple: it is better to defend their margins in the medium-term than to build now and reduce the unit price of new houses.

Rather than pointing the finger at planners – who for all their faults are currently approving 90% of new housing schemes – the Government needs to think carefully about how it can use policy to help councils get back into the housebuilding game.

Many authorities are already building small numbers of new council houses, and this could be radically accelerated to help local government form joint ventures with the private sector to deliver commercial homes as well.

This kind of JV would be able to undercut the big developers and introduce more competition into the oligarchic housebuilding business in a way that free-marketeers should applaud.

Ministers need not be worried about the implications of more council borrowing.  The
Government can unlock new development by repurposing the £3.5bn help-to-buy scheme, which would be better spent on new homes than on inflating the price of existing ones.

Prudential borrowing and joint ventures with housing associations could do the rest.

The British housing industry is suffering from an all-too-clear case of market failure and when that happens, it is time for the state to step in

Simon Parker is director of the NLGN
 

Why age alone shouldn’t define local government leadership image

Why age alone shouldn’t define local government leadership

Age should never define leadership in local government, says Graeme McDonald, Managing Director of Solace. Instead, councils should invest in inclusive, skills-based development for officers and councillors to deliver effective public services.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Head of Democratic Services, Elections & Monitoring Officer

Harborough District Council
Grade 12 £67,236 – £71,223 plus £3000pa Statutory Officer Allowance
We are looking for an accomplished and proactive leader for our vacant post of Head of Democratic Services & Elections Market Harborough, Leicestershire
Recuriter: Harborough District Council

Social Worker

Durham County Council
£35,412 - £39,152 (pre-progression) / £40,777 - £45,091 (post-progression)
We are looking for social workers who have completed the assessed and supported year in employment to join our Families First teams, working with our Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Social Worker

Durham County Council
Grade 9 £35,412 - £39,152 (Pre-Progression) / Grade 11 £40,777 - £45,091 (Post-Progression)
Are you a nurturing social worker passionate about supporting parents so that children can remain with their birth family?     This could be the right Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Administrative Officer

Durham County Council
Grade 4 £25,583 - £26,824
An exciting opportunity has arisen for a Administrative Officer to join our busy, friendly team, supporting Children and Young People’s Services. 1 x Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Lunchtime Play Worker

Durham County Council
£24,796 pro rata
Lunchtime Play Worker Grade 1 £24,796 pro rata Part Time - 6.25 hour per week, Monday – Friday
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner