Ann McGauran 20 April 2021

Shielding scheme took too long to identify up to 800,000, says PAC

Shielding scheme took too long to identify up to 800,000, says PAC image

MPs have hit out at the Government’s ‘quickly drawn up’ COVID-19 shielding programme for taking too long to identify up to 800,000 people who may have missed out on help.

Selective application of ‘at risk’ criteria led to some elderly and vision-impaired people struggling to access food at the start of the pandemic, according to a report from the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) published today.

Almost half of the 800,000 were unreachable because of missing or incorrect telephone numbers in NHS records and the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) still does not know whether councils have been able to reach them.

The report said that a newly expanded approach to vulnerability, which includes key characteristics such as ethnicity, postcode and body mass index resulted in an additional 1.7m people being classified as clinically extremely vulnerable in February.

Chair of the PAC Meg Hillier said: ‘The shielding response in the COVID pandemic has particularly exposed the high human cost of the lack of planning for shielding in pandemic planning scenarios.

'It also highlights the perennial issue of poor data and joined up policy systems.

‘There are questions still to be answered about the balance between central decision-making and local knowledge – the increase in numbers of those advised to shield demonstrates the challenges of trying to deliver this programme centrally, as well as with the data held by the NHS.'

‘Plans were, eventually, sensibly devolved to local authorities.' 

MHCLG has been approached for comment.

Tackling mistrust about vaccines image

Tackling mistrust about vaccines

Dr Justin Varney looks at how Birmingham is working to tackle the ‘layers upon layers of mistrust’ among ethnic minority communities that is ‘now playing out in vaccine hesitancy’.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Senior Lawyer (Safeguarding Children)

Royal Borough of Greenwich
£45834 - £48819 per annum
Are you an experienced childcare Lawyer with local government experience and looking for variety and challenge?The jobGreenwich Legal Services is comm England, London, Woolwich
Recuriter: Royal Borough of Greenwich

Lawyer (Planning & Highways)

Royal Borough of Greenwich
£40869 - £43860 per annum
Are you a Planning & Highways Lawyer with local government experience and looking for variety and challenge?The jobGreenwich Legal Services is committ England, London, Woolwich
Recuriter: Royal Borough of Greenwich

Regeneration Projects Manager

South Gloucestershire Council
£47,778 - £52,120
This is an exciting opportunity to lead comprehensive town centre regeneration programmes, specifically for... Gloucestershire
Recuriter: South Gloucestershire Council

Senior Lawyer, Regeneration & Property

Royal Borough of Greenwich
£45834 - £48819 per annum
Are you a Senior Regeneration & Property Lawyer with local government experience and looking for variety and challenge?Royal Greenwich is proud to be England, London, Woolwich
Recuriter: Royal Borough of Greenwich

Job Evaluation & Research Officer

Birmingham City Council
£27,741 - £34,728
2 x Job Evaluation & Research Officers will be supporting the Senior Job Evaluation & Research Officer and Reward & Recognition Manager. Birmingham, West Midlands
Recuriter: Birmingham City Council

Public Property

Latest issue - Public Property News

This issue of Public Property examines how how flexible workspaces can lead the way in regeneration for local authorities, Why local authority intervention is key to successful urban regeneration schemes and if the Government’s challenge of embracing beauty is an opportunity for communities.

The March issue also takes a closer look at Blackburn with Darwen Council's first digital health hub to help people gain control over health and care services.

Register for your free digital issue