Hannah Vickers 25 October 2018

Scrapping the Levy: Why we need a change in approach to CIL

Introduced to simplify the process to allow councils to raise funds from developers, the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) was intended to provide a fair means for councils to mitigate the impact of new developments on the local community.

It was meant to provide a universal way for councils to raise funds towards local roads, the building of schools or GP surgeries. Complementing existing Section 106s agreements, the legislation meant that any property development, large or small, was expected to contribute in proportion to their impact on the local community.

However, our new research reveals that this is far from the case. On one level, very few councils are choosing to implement the levy in the first place – 57% to not do so. Put simply this means that most developments in England and Wales are not contributing fairly to the system.

Of the 43% of councils who do use CIL, some £443m is currently sitting unspent in their bank accounts. Given the financial constraints that councils are currently under, this is somewhat surprising; this is money that should be invested in local infrastructure for the benefit of the local community.

In 2015, the independent CIL Review Team was tasked by government to look into the effectiveness of the levy and its findings, published a year later, have been reinforced by our own analysis. Councils at the time complained that CIL was overly complex and this has been reinforced by our own informal conversations with planners – the legislation runs at over 155 pages, with some 129 specific regulations. Given the fact that in many cases councils’ planning departments have been cut even closer to the bone in the last few years, is it any wonder CIL remains misused and misunderstood?

With the Budget next week there is an opportunity for the chancellor to address this situation. Firstly, we’re calling for a simplification of the system to make it easier for councils to raise the funds in the first place. Secondly, we want to ensure that there’s more transparency in the system, so councils know how to spend the money, developers know what they’re contributing to and local residents are aware of how the funds will be dedicated to local infrastructure. All of this should compel councils to better spend the levy.

In the medium term, our proposed solution is for England and Wales to explore the potential for a Property Sales Levy. Inspired by the Real Property Transfer Tax currently in place in New York City, this would apply a 1% to 1.425% charge on the sale of a property destined for local infrastructure. We estimate that a similar tax could raise an additional £2.16bn across England – more than all local councils spent on transport infrastructure in the last year.

But perhaps more importantly it’s transparent, simple and fair. Levied by HMRC and distributed equitably, it would reduce the complexity and bureaucracy of the existing system and would also create a clearer link between infrastructure investment and the resulting increased property values.

Whether a Property Sales Levy or another idea, it’s clear that the system is in need of reform. For the government to come anywhere near its ambitious target of 300,000 homes a year we need to nurture an environment that welcomes new development. Infrastructure spending is one of the keys to this, but the complexity of the current system is holding us back.

Hannah Vickers is chief executive of the Association for Consultancy and Engineering (ACE).

Smarter steps to a greener future image

Smarter steps to a greener future

Brightly’s digital asset management solution, Confirm, is helping local authorities to streamline their operations, cut costs and contribute to the wider, global sustainability mission. Hannah Winstanley explains more.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Children's Social Workers and Senior Social Workers (Children Looked After)

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£32,427 to £44,658
Here in Wandsworth, we are on an exciting journey of transformation. Richmond upon Thames, London (Greater)
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Peripatetic Customer Services Adviser

Northumberland County Council
£20,444 - £22,129
Northumberland County Council operates a huge range of services across one of the largest counties in the UK. Northumberland
Recuriter: Northumberland County Council

Principal Engineer - York Central

City of York Council
£37,114 to £42,562
We have an exciting opening for an experienced highway design engineer. York, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: City of York Council

Senior Highway Adoptions Inspector

City of York Council
£31,887 to £36,380
We have an exciting opening for an experienced highway inspector. York, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: City of York Council

Highways Asset Engineer

Hackney London Borough Council
£37,260 - £38,148
Are you an experienced Asset Management professional looking for your next challenge? Hackney, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Hackney London Borough Council

Partner Content

Circular highways is a necessity not an aspiration – and it’s within our grasp

Shell is helping power the journey towards a circular paving industry with Shell Bitumen LT R, a new product for roads that uses plastics destined for landfill as part of the additives to make the bitumen.

Support from Effective Energy Group for Local Authorities to Deliver £430m Sustainable Warmth Funded Energy Efficiency Projects

Effective Energy Group is now offering its support to the 40 Local Authorities who have received a share of the £430m to deliver their projects on the ground by surveying properties and installing measures.

Pay.UK – the next step in Bacs’ evolution

Dougie Belmore explains how one of the main interfaces between you and Bacs is about to change.