Mike Brogan 12 November 2014

Right to Move or Wrong?

The recent Right to Move proposal from Eric Pickles has been hailed as the solution we’ve been waiting for to improve mobility for social housing tenants. Many tenants have historically been restricted to taking work in their immediate area only due to possible waiting lists for accommodation provided by another social landlord in an alternative locality.

It is claimed that Pickles’ plan could enable these residents to search for work beyond their existing community while safe in the knowledge that they will be supported in finding alternative accommodation by another landlord elsewhere.

While some have suggested that this increase in freedom will significantly aid those who are genuinely seeking training and employment, the reality is, as always, not so clean cut in practice.

There are multiple considerations which must be accounted for in the delivery of Right to Move which include cost, supply and demand, as well as the impact on an individual’s own wellbeing.

It is no secret that moving home can be a difficult transition but this is further exasperated when your have to consider accommodating the family support structure and friend network.

Practically speaking, guaranteeing a roof over the head of the social housing tenant and their respective family could be straight forward but securing their buy in can be much less so – something seemingly not accounted for within Right to Move as it stands.

Rather than facilitating the displacement of families from their communities, it would be more realistic to distribute available work more strategically to those willing to take it in the local area and therefore create opportunities for genuine long-term regeneration of a community.

Matching supply and demand in this manner also avoids the costs that are associated with a house move that are unlikely to be accounted for by a tenant’s new employer, regardless of previous location, or easily afforded by themselves.

It would appear that the human element of moving to another area has been forgotten here which could ultimately mean it is wrong to move tenants in this way and might scupper the initiative’s success despite its good intentions.

Mike Brogan is chief executive of Re:allies and Procure Plus

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

PRINCIPAL TRANSPORT PLANNING OFFICER

Hull City Council
£43693 - £46731
We have an exciting opportunity for an experienced professional to join our team in Hull as a Principal Transport Planning Officer. Kingston upon Hull, East Riding of Yorkshire
Recuriter: Hull City Council

HIGHWAYS AND TRAFFIC ENGINEER - 4 POSTS

Hull City Council
£43693 - £46731
We have several exciting opportunities for suitably qualified Highways Civil Engineers and Traffic Engineers Wilson Centre, 1st floor, Hull HU1 2AG
Recuriter: Hull City Council

Strategic Director, Finance and Resources (S.151 Officer)

Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council
£110,799 - £120,706
Blackburn with Darwen is a distinctive, welcoming and vibrant borough with a strong identity and a genuine buzz about the place. Blackburn, Lancashire
Recuriter: Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council

Residential Worker, Edge of Care Service

Durham County Council
Grade 7 £29,093 - £32,654 PAY AWARD PENDING
Join a Groundbreaking Team Supporting Families in Seaham Salary
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Bikeability Cycling Instructor

Durham County Council
Grade 4 £24,790 to £25,992 pro rata (Pay Award Pending)
The Road Safety Team are keen to recruit additional Casual Bikability Instructors to join our team of instructors delivering Bikeability cycle trainin Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner