22 September 2023

Rethinking council tax in Scotland

Rethinking council tax in Scotland  image
Image: Fotokon / Shutterstock.com.

Alison Payne, research director of Reform Scotland, argues that it is past time for a major rethink of council tax in Scotland.

Devolution was never supposed to stop at Holyrood, but while there have been continued calls, both from within and from without parliament, for greater decentralisation of fiscal powers and reform of council tax in Scotland, nothing has changed.

Indeed, arguably more powers have been centralised through policies such as caps on council tax and police centralisation.

Reform Scotland believes that it is past time for a major rethink, and for the genuine empowerment of Scotland’s councils. Scotland needs a new and better balance of powers between Holyrood and local government. While proposals to devolve responsibilities over measures such as workplace parking or tourism levies are to be welcomed, we need to shift away from the slow drip of powers to a more permissible and empowering system, and that needs to begin with local taxes.

The Scottish government’s recent consultation on reforming council tax was a disappointing missed opportunity. While the consultation document acknowledges that the current system is regressive, unfair, and out of date, it offers no alternative beyond a small tinkering of the bands.

The number of dwellings classed as Band E-H, which will be impacted by the change, varies significantly across the country, but this issue has also been ignored.

Instead, we had the latest in a long line of examples of much-needed reform being avoided.

For example, in 2002, the Local Government Committee said the system of local government finance needed renewal and that there should be a shift in the balance of local/central revenue raising:

‘The Committee does not believe that the existing local government finance system is sufficiently robust - and believes that part of the problem lies in the balance between the central and local funding of councils' General Fund revenue budgets.

‘The Committee recommends that councils should retain the responsibility for a wide range of services - including major services such as Education and Social Work Services - but that the central/local funding balance should change from the existing 80:20 split to 50:50, or as close to 50:50 as is possible, as soon as is practicable.

‘The Committee recommends the Scottish Executive to introduce legislation to return the non-domestic rate to local control at the earliest opportunity.’

But nothing changed.

A 2014 Local Government Committee inquiry into flexibility and autonomy in local government again recommended greater local fiscal autonomy. Critically, it recognised that empowerment didn’t create postcode lotteries – rather, it was a matter of local accountability and decision making:

‘We consider there should be a range of taxes or charges from which they should be free to choose to levy to meet local circumstances and needs. The cross-party commission should consider whether there should be a range of taxes or charges from which local authorities should be free to choose to levy to meet local circumstances and needs.

‘We recognise this power will lead to variations across the country which we see as a desirable adjunct of the exercise of democracy. It would then be for locally elected politicians to be held to account by their electorate.’

But again, nothing changed.

Changing any tax regime will always create ‘winners and losers’, but leadership requires the willingness to make difficult decisions.

Reform Scotland believes that we need radical reform of the council tax. We don’t want to see one centrally controlled local tax replaced with another centrally controlled tax, rather we believe that local authorities should have complete control over their local tax - including the rates, bands and indeed form of the tax. This would allow individual councils to take their differing needs and priorities into account and devise the best system for their area. It would be a true local tax, accountable to local politicians.

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Class Teacher (Year 3)

Durham County Council
£37,101- £45,352
Class Teacher (Year 3) M3 to M6- £37,101- £45,352 Temporary till 31 August 2027- Full Time Required to start 1 September 2026.   The Governing Board o Newton Aycliffe
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Classroom Teacher

Durham County Council
£32,916 - £45,352
Coxhoe Primary School- Classroom Teacher M1-6- £32,916 - £45,352 Fixed Term- 1 year Contract (till 31st August 2027) Full Time. Required to start 1st Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Class Teacher (Maternity Cover)

Durham County Council
£32,916 - £42,057
Class Teacher – Maternity Cover MPS £32,916 - £42,057 Temporary upon return of substantive postholder - Full Time Required from 1 September 2026. Cot Peterlee
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Enhanced Teaching Assistant (Sports Development Officer)

Durham County Council
£26,403 - £28,598 pro rata (term time plus two weeks)
Enhanced Teaching Assistant (Sports Development Officer) Grade 5- £26,403 - £28,598 pro rata (term time plus two weeks) Fixed Term- Full Time Required Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Degree Apprentice (Building Services Design Engineer)

Durham County Council
Grade 1
Durham County Council
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner