Richard Machin 18 October 2021

Personal Independence Payment for people with mental health problems: Implications for local government

Personal Independence Payment for people with mental health problems: Implications for local government image

Personal Independence Payment (PIP) was introduced in April 2013, replacing Disability Living Allowance (DLA) as the main non-means tested disability benefit intended to assist with the additional costs associated with disability or long-term health conditions.

Changes in benefit policy such as this are challenging for many claimants, but through interviews with service users we found that this major welfare reform caused significant problems for people with mental health problems, and that policy implemented in a climate of austerity is particularly problematic. Our findings also reveal the impact it has on local government services.

All participants in our research reported increased anxiety as a result of the benefit change, problems with the PIP claims process and medical assessment, and difficulty communicating with staff from the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP). They also expressed difficulty in accurately reporting complex health problems on the PIP claim form.

There was also strong discontentment about the medical assessment which claimants must attend, and which are delivered by private contractors Atos and Capita. Participants felt that the medical assessments were inflexible and impersonal, and failed to acknowledge the true extent of mental health problems experienced.

They often expressed a feeling of being judged: 'It doesn’t seem right that the medical assessment is done by the same people if you have mental problems or not. I’m not sure they really got what I was trying to say to them.'

The communication difficulties centred on the DWP failing to provide clear and understandable information about the new criteria for PIP, and the practicalities of the medical assessment.

More positive experiences were reported. Research participants emphasised that PIP is a vital source of income, not only for disability-related expenditure but also for more general living costs such as food, utility bills, and transport. All respondents stated that they valued the support of professional welfare right advisers to help them to navigate through a complex process. For many, the experience of claiming PIP was associated with forging new links in the community with people experiencing similar challenges, often through online networks.

Our findings present several significant implications for local government. In broad terms, this research demonstrated that people with mental health problems can find periods of reform and transformation overwhelming. Language, messaging, and clarity around timescales were all identified as being important to people with mental health problems.

Local government staff should be mindful of avoiding a ‘test and learn’ approach when introducing new policies or initiatives which affect people with mental health problems. Too often people with mental health problems felt that their views were ignored or overlooked, and timely and meaningful equality impact assessments are crucial.

This research clearly demonstrated that for people with mental health problems the additional income provided by PIP is crucial. Where this source of income is lost or interrupted, claimants will, of course, often turn to local government for support. Whether this is through social services, housing support or discretionary funds such as the new Household Support Fund. Ensuring people with mental health problems are claiming the correct disability benefits is important to local residents and local government services.

Over the last decade we have witnessed significant cuts to both in-house local government advice services and voluntary sector agencies. This research demonstrates that people with mental health problems rely on expert, independent welfare benefits advice. Within the challenging landscape where local government has been hit with austerity measures and new COVID-19 pressures, it remains crucial that people with mental health problems are clearly signposted to local welfare rights services.

Finally, this research demonstrated that significant policy change is often underpinned with outsourced and digitalised services. These can work, but often people with mental health problems feel they are lost in systems which lack personalised support. Providing tailored services for people with mental health problems has always been important for local government, and this remains the case as we continue to see the long-term impact of a decade-long programme of welfare reform.

Richard Machin is Senior Lecturer in Social Work and Health at Nottingham Trent University

This research was carried out in conjunction with Fiona McCormack, Centre for Health and Development, Staffordshire University. Read the full paper here.

Photo: Graeme Lamb / Shutterstock.com

The £37,000 SEND Problem image

The £37,000 SEND Problem

Natalie Kenneison, COO at Imosphere, argues that the real SEND funding crisis isn’t just about budgets - it’s about the systems behind the decisions.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Family Support Worker

Durham County Council
Grade 6 - £27,269 - £30,060 (Pay award pending)
Do you have a real passion for helping families to make positive changes for themselves and their children? This might be the right role for you!   WH Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Clerical Officer Receptionist

Durham County Council
Grade 3 £24,404 - £25,183 Pro Rata to hours worked Pay award pending
WHAT IS INVOLVED? We are looking to appoint a part time Clerical officer/Receptionist within Business Services to provide a professional, effective a Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Administration Assistant

Durham County Council
£25,584 - £27,711 pro rata
Administration Assistant Grade 5    £25,584 - £27,711 pro rata Temporary – required from 1st October 2025 until 31 December 2025 37 hours per week, Te Consett
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Support Assistant

Durham County Council
£24,027 pro rata
Support Assistant Grade 1 £24,027 pro rata Temporary – required from 1st October 2025 until 31st October 2026 Part Time, 32.5 hours Mon - Fri 9am -4pm Consett
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Lecturer in Foundation Learning -Maths, English and Digital

Durham County Council
Grade 9 £34,314 - £37,938 pro rata for part-time term time working PAY AWARD PENDING
The DurhamLearn Foundation Learning programme area delivers Digital Skills, English and Maths Functional Skills.   An opportunity has arisen for a Lec Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner