Laura Sharman 20 May 2015

PCC says referendum rules are ‘affront to democracy’

The police and crime commissioner behind the UK’s first council tax referendum has hit out at the ‘unfair’ wording of the ballot, saying the rules were an ‘affront to democracy’.

The majority of residents in Bedfordshire voted ‘no’ in the referendum, which was called after PCC Olly Martins proposed a 15.8% increase in the amount taxpayers pay towards policing.

However, Martins has now said the referendum question and the information provided to taxpayers were ‘inadequate’ and is calling for an urgent review of referendum regulations.

He said: ‘The question set by the Government on the ballot papers failed to mention what the cash amount of the increase was. Furthermore, it created the misleading impression that the percentage rise was on the whole of the council tax.’

Martins added that many ‘frustrated’ residents had complained to him about the wording of the question, saying it prevented them making an informed decision.

He said: ‘The unfairness of the process is not just to me or the police force I am responsible for, but also clearly to the public who were not in a position to make an informed decision, where they had the facts by which they could weigh the benefits of a "Yes" against the diminished service resulting from a "No" vote.’

The question on the ballot paper read:

Part of the council tax in your area goes to the Bedfordshire Police and Crime Commissioner. For the financial year beginning on 1st April 2015 the Bedfordshire Police and Crime Commissioner has set an increase of 15.8% in the amount it charges.

If most voters choose ‘YES', the increase will be 15.8%.

If most voters choose ‘NO', the increase will be 2.0% instead.

Do you want the Bedfordshire Police and Crime Commissioner to increase the amount it charges by 15.8%? YES NO

Visit The MJ (£) to find out from Martins why he triggered the first ever referendum.

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Service Manager, Children’s Homes Service

Durham County Council
Grade 16 £56,554 - £60,680 Potential earnings up to £63,180 per annum.
Service Manager, Children’s Homes Service   Lead with Purpose, Inspire Change and Transform Lives.   Salary
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Systems Implementation Officer

Durham County Council
Grade 9 £35,412 to £39,152 per annum
Are you ready to lead the rollout of a brand-new ICT system for Children’s Homes in County Durham?   We’re seeking a proactive Systems Implementation Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Registered Homes Manager

Durham County Council
Grade 14 £50,269 - £54,495 plus £2,500 recruitment/retention allowance and £3,500 market supplement. The salary with additional payments equate to an earning potential per annum of £60,495 at the top of the grade.
Registered Homes Manager, Children’s Homes Service   Lead with Purpose, Inspire Change and Transform Lives.   Salary
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Building Surveyor

Durham County Council
Career Grade 9 to 12 - G9 £35,412 - £39,152 / G10 £38,220 - £41,771 / G11 £40,777 - £45,091 / G12 £44,075 - £48,226
The Construction Consultancy Services (CCS) team provide client-side construction consultancy services across a range of professional disciplines to d Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Multimedia Support Officer

Durham County Council
Grade 5 £26,403 to £28,598 per annum
We are looking for an organised individual who has strong marketing and commnication skills until 29 May 2026. WHAT IS INVOLVED? You will support the Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner