Laura Sharman 20 May 2015

PCC says referendum rules are ‘affront to democracy’

The police and crime commissioner behind the UK’s first council tax referendum has hit out at the ‘unfair’ wording of the ballot, saying the rules were an ‘affront to democracy’.

The majority of residents in Bedfordshire voted ‘no’ in the referendum, which was called after PCC Olly Martins proposed a 15.8% increase in the amount taxpayers pay towards policing.

However, Martins has now said the referendum question and the information provided to taxpayers were ‘inadequate’ and is calling for an urgent review of referendum regulations.

He said: ‘The question set by the Government on the ballot papers failed to mention what the cash amount of the increase was. Furthermore, it created the misleading impression that the percentage rise was on the whole of the council tax.’

Martins added that many ‘frustrated’ residents had complained to him about the wording of the question, saying it prevented them making an informed decision.

He said: ‘The unfairness of the process is not just to me or the police force I am responsible for, but also clearly to the public who were not in a position to make an informed decision, where they had the facts by which they could weigh the benefits of a "Yes" against the diminished service resulting from a "No" vote.’

The question on the ballot paper read:

Part of the council tax in your area goes to the Bedfordshire Police and Crime Commissioner. For the financial year beginning on 1st April 2015 the Bedfordshire Police and Crime Commissioner has set an increase of 15.8% in the amount it charges.

If most voters choose ‘YES', the increase will be 15.8%.

If most voters choose ‘NO', the increase will be 2.0% instead.

Do you want the Bedfordshire Police and Crime Commissioner to increase the amount it charges by 15.8%? YES NO

Visit The MJ (£) to find out from Martins why he triggered the first ever referendum.

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Therapeutic Social Worker

Durham County Council
Grade 9 £35,412 - £39,152 per annum (pre-progression) / Grade 11 £40,777 - £45,091 per annum (post - progression) Pay award pending.
We are looking for two Therapeutic Social Workers to join our team. One permanent contract is available and one temporary contract is avialable for th Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Health and Safety Technical Assistant

Durham County Council
£26,403 to £28,598 p.a. (Grade 5) Pay Award Pending
We have a full-time opportunity available for a Health and Safety Technical Assistant to join our team.  The post is temporary for a period of 12 mont Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Social Worker

Durham County Council
Grade 9 - £35,412 - £39,152 (pre-progression) / Grade 11 - £40,777 - £45,091 (post-progression) - Pay award pending
We are looking for a social worker who has completed their assessed and supported year in employment to join our Children in Care teams. In this role Seaham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Social Worker - Assessment & Intervention, Mid Essex

Essex County Council
£36124.00 - £51834.00 per annum
Social Worker - Assessment & Intervention, Mid EssexPermanent, Full Time£36,124 to £51,834 per annum Location
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Information Management and Data Services Officer

Durham County Council
Grade 9 £35,412 - £39,152
Do you have what it takes to develop innovative data products to help drive improvements? This is an exciting time to join Durham’s Children and Youn Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner