Martin Ford 13 March 2023

No extra social care funding for struggling councils

No extra social care funding for struggling councils image
Image: fizkes/Shutterstock.com.

Hopes for increased social care funding for struggling local authorities have been dashed.

Social care minister Helen Whately said during a Local Government Association (LGA) webinar that councils would receive further support if they were found to be in need of improvement under new Care Quality Commission (CQC) assessments.

However, deputy director of adult social care data at the Department of Health and Social Care, Julie Laughton, said this would not mean more funding.

‘It’s about having access to tailored expertise,’ she said, adding that there would be ‘opportunities to escalate that support’.

Ms Laughton added: ‘It would have to be that the local authority could not improve for whatever reason.’

It is believed statutory intervention would only be resorted to in cases of ‘persistent failures’.

Ms Laughton admitted: ‘It’s a difficult time to introduce something new like this – we need to make sure this is helping and not making life more difficult.’

Chair of the LGA’s community wellbeing board, David Fothergill, said there was ‘angst’ and ‘serious concern’ about single-word ratings, adding: ‘It’s really difficult to reduce a complicated service down to one word.’

Ms Whately responded: ‘There will be a narrative – it’s not as simple as just a rating,’ although she conceded some people would rely on the rating alone.

She continued: ‘It’s important this is accessible and transparent to people.

‘It’s not about a stick to beat people with.

'I want to shine a light on where there’s really good practice.’

Ms Whately also said she was working with local government minister Lee Rowley on the Office for Local Government about what data it will require.

She added: ‘We are very mindful of not asking for more than is essential.'

Also answering questions at the webinar, the CQC’s chief inspector for adult social care, Kate Terroni, said assessments ‘won’t take account of financial resources allocated to social care’ and would be ‘centred on people’.

However, she added the CQC ‘will form a view nationally’ on funding.

This article was originally published by The MJ (£).

The £37,000 SEND Problem image

The £37,000 SEND Problem

Natalie Kenneison, COO at Imosphere, argues that the real SEND funding crisis isn’t just about budgets - it’s about the systems behind the decisions.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Director of Public Health

North Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council
£105,467 pa
North Tyneside has ambitious plans for the people and places across the borough. North Tyneside, Tyne and Wear / Any Location
Recuriter: North Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council

Principal Licensing Officer

Bromsgrove and Redditch Councils
£43,693 - £46,731 (Grade 9)
Worcestershire Regulatory Services (WRS) are recruiting to the post of Principal Licensing officer. Bromsgrove, Worcestershire
Recuriter: Bromsgrove and Redditch Councils

Employment Vetting Officer

Essex County Council
£26090.00 - £30693.00 per annum + pension
Employment Vetting OfficerFixed Term, Full Time£26,090 to £30,693 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Quality Improvement Officer

Royal Borough of Greenwich
£34,416 - £35,448
Your primary role will be to provide administrative support to frontline staff. Greenwich, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Royal Borough of Greenwich

Senior Support Worker

Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council
Band D, SCP9 - 17 (£26,409 - £30,060) per annum
We have an exciting opportunity to join a bespoke service within adult services. Sandwell, West Midlands
Recuriter: Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council
Linkedin Banner