Thomas Bridge 23 January 2015

Low-income families hit hardest by tax and benefit changes, says IFS

Low-income families and the very rich have been hit hardest by Coalition tax and benefit reforms, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS).

While cuts to means-tested benefits and tax credits have left poorer families losing the most as a percentage of their income, Government approaches since 2010 have left middle to higher income working age families ‘remarkably unscathed’ – IFS analysis suggests.

The richest tenth of households have lost out the most in cash terms, partly due to tax rises introduced by Labour in April 2010 before the Coalition came into power.

Labour shadow Treasury minister, Cathy Jamieson, said: ‘Families with children have been hit hardest of all by David Cameron’s choices - a clear betrayal of his promise to lead the most family-friendly government ever.’

‘For all the Government’s claims, this report shows that they have raised tax by over £13.5 billion a year. And for millions of working people the rise in VAT and cuts to things like tax credits have more than offset changes to the personal allowance,’ she added.

Chief executive of charity 4Children, Anne Longfield OBE, said: ‘With wages stagnating and benefit changes having this effect, particularly on low income households, we know that many families are finding the cost of childcare overwhelming - leading them to consider giving up work as a result. Others are resorting to borrowing to cover the costs of essentials and entering into a cycle of debt from which it is difficult to escape.

‘Families are our greatest asset and we need to help them flourish. Sure Start Children's Centres should be at the centre of any government's approach to bringing together childcare and other services which help support families in their daily lives.’

A Treasury spokesman said: ‘The IFS confirms that the richest have lost the most from the Government’s changes to taxes and welfare. Fairness is at the heart of our approach to reducing the deficit.

‘UK income inequality is now lower than when this Government came into office and the recovery is being felt across the country. But the only sustainable way to raise living standards for all is to keep working through the plan that is securing a better future across the country.’

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

School Crossing Patroller

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
Pro Rata Salary - £5353,77
Job Title
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Principal Housing Lawyer - Epping Forest District Council

Essex County Council
£61754.0000 - £72026.0000 per annum
Essex County Council (ECC) are delighted to be supporting Epping Forest District Council in recruiting a Principal Housing Lawyer.Please click HERE to England, Essex, Epping
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Apprentice - Housing Management

Durham County Council
£15,434 per annum (£8.00ph) NMW
Earn.  Learn.  Qualify.   Do you want to earn while you learn, with the chance of progression once you qualify? Do you want the opportunity to grow, d Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Social Worker

Durham County Council
Grade 9 - £35,412 - £39,152 / Grade 11 - £40,777 - £45,091 (pay award pending)
1 X Temporary post (22.5 hpw) until 31/03/2027 - Hospital Discharge Team East - Seaham 1 x Temporary post (30 hpw) maternity cover for 12 months or re Seaham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Social Worker (Mental Wellbeing Service)

The Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead
£40,192 - £44,012 per annum
We have an exciting opportunity for a Social Worker to join our Mental Wellbeing Service! Maidenhead, Berkshire
Recuriter: The Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead
Linkedin Banner