Thomas Bridge 26 June 2015

Legal warning over fracking issued to Lancashire councillors

Lancashire councillors have been warned the town hall risks being fined if it blocks local fracking as the move could be considered ‘unreasonable’.

Energy firm Cuadrilla has submitted planning applications to explore for shale gas at two sites in the northwestern county, involving drilling, hydraulically fracking, testing gas flows and the construction of up to four vertical bore holes at each site.

The town hall’s development control committee last night voted to refuse an application at Roseacre Wood, citing the potentially severe impact any development would have on the road network.

Residents and campaigners have this week been staging protests outside the town hall against Cuadrilla’s proposals.

Lancashire has deferred making a decision on a second site at Preston New Road until Monday, after the local authority’s planning officer recommended the application be given the go ahead.

David Manley QC has now said a refusal of the Preston New Road site without ‘substantial objective evidence’ could ‘readily be described as unreasonable in planning terms’.

He told the local authority’s development committee that it would be ‘highly likely’ Cuadrilla would appeal against any refusal based on a ‘generalised policy’ and there was ‘a high risk that a costs penalty will be imposed upon the council’ if such an appeal took place.

Manley added that councillors could be forced to give evidence at the appeal themselves as ‘it would be difficult, if not impossible, to find a reputable independent planning consultant to defend LCC’s position’.

However Friends of the Earth’s legal advisor, Jake White, said the legal advice was ‘flawed’ and ‘failed to address a number of important considerations including health or noise impacts’.

‘The legal advice sits within a framework of national government policy which privileges fracking over clean wind energy technology. This puts huge pressure on councillors to back fracking against their better judgement,’ White said.

‘Councillors are elected to make decisions in the best interests of their communities. They should not be bounced in to voting for fracking based on rushed and flawed legal advice or by a policy framework skewed in favour of dirty energy.’

Cuadrilla said it was ‘disappointed but not surprised’ by Lancashire’s decision to refuse permission for the Roseacre Wood site and is considering launching an appeal.

Photo: Friends of the Earth

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Deputy Headteacher

Durham County Council
£66,368 - £73,105
Permanent Contract - Full Time - N.O.R. 341 Required for April 2027 or earlier (if possible)   Due to the promotion of the current post holder, an exc Seaham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Bereavement Officer

Durham County Council
Grade 8 £33,673 - £37,563 pro rata
Are you a compassionate, organised and customer-focused professional with the ability to support families and communities during some of life's most d Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Shared Planning Lawyer

Broxbourne Borough Council
Up to £68,506 pa
Are you a focused, enthusiastic team player who enjoys a varied and interesting caseload? Borough Offices, Bishops’ College, Churchgate, Cheshunt
Recuriter: Broxbourne Borough Council

Families First Partnership Manager

Nottingham City Council
£58,602 - £62,109
As Families First Partnership Manager, you will play a pivotal role in leading Nottingham’s Families First approach Nottingham, Nottinghamshire
Recuriter: Nottingham City Council

Experts at Hand Co-ordinator

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£42,081 - £50,994 per annum
Experts at Hand Co-ordinator
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
Linkedin Banner