William Eichler Thursday, March 14, 2019

It’s ‘business as usual’ at Mersey bridge, council defiantly insists

Halton Borough Council has said it is ‘business as usual’ at the Mersey Gateway despite a tribunal decision that the bridge’s crossing charge is 'not a tolling scheme’.

A Traffic Penalty Tribunal appeal ruling has said that drivers pay a ‘road user charge’ at the Mersey Gateway and not a toll as the council argues. The two are legally different.

The appeal was brought by Scrap Mersey Tolls (SMT) campaigner Damian Curzon who argued there were errors in the wording of two penalty charge notices he received for failing to pay the £2 crossing charge on 15 June 2018.

The tribunal adjudicator M. F. Kennedy concluded that the scheme is a road user charging scheme, not a toll, and the use of the word ‘toll’ on the penalty charge notice was a ‘procedural impropriety’.

The sign on the bridge in question is authorised for a tolling scheme only, Mr Kennedy said.

Halton BC also failed to consider Mr Curzon’s representations, Mr Kennedy added, which amounts to another ‘procedural impropriety’.

The fact that the council did not respond to the representations within 56 days means they have been accepted by the authority and the charge should be dropped.

Responding to the decision, a spokesperson for Halton BC said: ‘Adjudication by the Traffic Penalty Tribunal (TPT) cannot and does not, in law, invalidate or remove the powers in place from the 14 October 2017 to administer and enforce tolls on the Mersey Gateway Bridge.’

The TPT’s decision ‘does not have general effect nor carry any weight as precedent,’ the spokesperson continued.

‘Any suggestion that the council has no power to charge or enforce how it does this or that the council is acting inappropriately or “illegally” is misleading, inaccurate and wrong in law,’ they added.

Furthermore, they challenged the Tribunal’s comments with regards to the bridge sign.

‘The Adjudicator’s decision in respect of signage contradicts the decision of the Adjudicator in the early case where the Adjudicator concluded signage is “large, well sited, in clear view, and to communicate to a driver unfamiliar with the area that a payment was required and how to pay.”’

‘It’s business as usual at the Mersey Gateway – please continue to pay to use Mersey Gateway,’ the spokesperson concluded.

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Team Manager - DBIT Core Service, North Essex

Essex County Council
£55892.0000 - £69241.0000 per annum
Team Manager - DBIT Core Service, North EssexFixed Term, Full Time£55,892 to £69,241 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Social Worker

Durham County Council
Grade 9 - £35,412 - £39,152 (pre-progression) / Grade 11 - £40,777 - £45,091 (post-progression) - Pay Award Pending
We are looking for a social worker who has completed their assessed and supported year in employment to join our Children in Care teams. In this role Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Service Manager – Child Protection and Allegations Management

Durham County Council
£56,554 - £60,680 - Grade 16
We are looking for a Service Manager to lead our newly created Child Protection and Allegations Management Service. This is a brand-new leadership rol Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Business Rates Officer

Durham County Council
£26,403 to £28,598 p.a. (Grade 5) pay award pending
Do you have experience of dealing with members of the public in a caring and responsive manner?  Do you have good organisational, numerical and time m Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Assessment and Awards Officer

Durham County Council
£26,403 to £28,598 p.a. (Grade 5) pay award pending
Do you have experience of dealing with members of the public in a caring and responsive manner?  Do you have good organisational, numerical and time m Spennymoor
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner