William Eichler 14 March 2019

It’s ‘business as usual’ at Mersey bridge, council defiantly insists

Halton Borough Council has said it is ‘business as usual’ at the Mersey Gateway despite a tribunal decision that the bridge’s crossing charge is 'not a tolling scheme’.

A Traffic Penalty Tribunal appeal ruling has said that drivers pay a ‘road user charge’ at the Mersey Gateway and not a toll as the council argues. The two are legally different.

The appeal was brought by Scrap Mersey Tolls (SMT) campaigner Damian Curzon who argued there were errors in the wording of two penalty charge notices he received for failing to pay the £2 crossing charge on 15 June 2018.

The tribunal adjudicator M. F. Kennedy concluded that the scheme is a road user charging scheme, not a toll, and the use of the word ‘toll’ on the penalty charge notice was a ‘procedural impropriety’.

The sign on the bridge in question is authorised for a tolling scheme only, Mr Kennedy said.

Halton BC also failed to consider Mr Curzon’s representations, Mr Kennedy added, which amounts to another ‘procedural impropriety’.

The fact that the council did not respond to the representations within 56 days means they have been accepted by the authority and the charge should be dropped.

Responding to the decision, a spokesperson for Halton BC said: ‘Adjudication by the Traffic Penalty Tribunal (TPT) cannot and does not, in law, invalidate or remove the powers in place from the 14 October 2017 to administer and enforce tolls on the Mersey Gateway Bridge.’

The TPT’s decision ‘does not have general effect nor carry any weight as precedent,’ the spokesperson continued.

‘Any suggestion that the council has no power to charge or enforce how it does this or that the council is acting inappropriately or “illegally” is misleading, inaccurate and wrong in law,’ they added.

Furthermore, they challenged the Tribunal’s comments with regards to the bridge sign.

‘The Adjudicator’s decision in respect of signage contradicts the decision of the Adjudicator in the early case where the Adjudicator concluded signage is “large, well sited, in clear view, and to communicate to a driver unfamiliar with the area that a payment was required and how to pay.”’

‘It’s business as usual at the Mersey Gateway – please continue to pay to use Mersey Gateway,’ the spokesperson concluded.

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Community Ambassador Project Officer

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£35,391 - £42,888
Community Ambassador Project Officer
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Director of Customer, Digital and Corporate Strategy 

North Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council
£108,842
If you are a strategic thinker who can inspire teams, champion innovation and drive meaningful change, we would love to hear from you.  North Tyneside, Tyne and Wear
Recuriter: North Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council

Trainee Business Administrator

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£27,781 - £31,575
Trainee Business Administrator
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Adults Social Worker - South Essex (Expression of Interest)

Essex County Council
£38487 - £51834 per annum
Register your interest here to be notified of upcoming Social Worker opportunities within Essex County Council's Adult Social Care services in South England, Essex, Basildon
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Minerals Monitoring and Compliance Officer

Durham County Council
Grade 9 £35,412 to £39,152 per annum
We are looking for an experienced individual who has the knowledge of service planning issues relating to development management and monitoring / comp Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council
Linkedin Banner