William Eichler 14 March 2019

It’s ‘business as usual’ at Mersey bridge, council defiantly insists

Halton Borough Council has said it is ‘business as usual’ at the Mersey Gateway despite a tribunal decision that the bridge’s crossing charge is 'not a tolling scheme’.

A Traffic Penalty Tribunal appeal ruling has said that drivers pay a ‘road user charge’ at the Mersey Gateway and not a toll as the council argues. The two are legally different.

The appeal was brought by Scrap Mersey Tolls (SMT) campaigner Damian Curzon who argued there were errors in the wording of two penalty charge notices he received for failing to pay the £2 crossing charge on 15 June 2018.

The tribunal adjudicator M. F. Kennedy concluded that the scheme is a road user charging scheme, not a toll, and the use of the word ‘toll’ on the penalty charge notice was a ‘procedural impropriety’.

The sign on the bridge in question is authorised for a tolling scheme only, Mr Kennedy said.

Halton BC also failed to consider Mr Curzon’s representations, Mr Kennedy added, which amounts to another ‘procedural impropriety’.

The fact that the council did not respond to the representations within 56 days means they have been accepted by the authority and the charge should be dropped.

Responding to the decision, a spokesperson for Halton BC said: ‘Adjudication by the Traffic Penalty Tribunal (TPT) cannot and does not, in law, invalidate or remove the powers in place from the 14 October 2017 to administer and enforce tolls on the Mersey Gateway Bridge.’

The TPT’s decision ‘does not have general effect nor carry any weight as precedent,’ the spokesperson continued.

‘Any suggestion that the council has no power to charge or enforce how it does this or that the council is acting inappropriately or “illegally” is misleading, inaccurate and wrong in law,’ they added.

Furthermore, they challenged the Tribunal’s comments with regards to the bridge sign.

‘The Adjudicator’s decision in respect of signage contradicts the decision of the Adjudicator in the early case where the Adjudicator concluded signage is “large, well sited, in clear view, and to communicate to a driver unfamiliar with the area that a payment was required and how to pay.”’

‘It’s business as usual at the Mersey Gateway – please continue to pay to use Mersey Gateway,’ the spokesperson concluded.

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Social Worker-Children's Disability Team

Oxfordshire County Council
£37035 - £43693
This is a rewarding opportunity, to ensure that services are planned and delivered in a way that maximises participation and reflects children’s rights in relation to services being provided; to act on views of children and young people and demonstrate Oxfordshire
Recuriter: Oxfordshire County Council

Director of Public Health

North Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council
£105,467 pa
North Tyneside has ambitious plans for the people and places across the borough. North Tyneside, Tyne and Wear / Any Location
Recuriter: North Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council

Principal Licensing Officer

Bromsgrove and Redditch Councils
£43,693 - £46,731 (Grade 9)
Worcestershire Regulatory Services (WRS) are recruiting to the post of Principal Licensing officer. Bromsgrove, Worcestershire
Recuriter: Bromsgrove and Redditch Councils

Employment Vetting Officer

Essex County Council
£26090.00 - £30693.00 per annum + pension
Employment Vetting OfficerFixed Term, Full Time£26,090 to £30,693 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Quality Improvement Officer

Royal Borough of Greenwich
£34,416 - £35,448
Your primary role will be to provide administrative support to frontline staff. Greenwich, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Royal Borough of Greenwich
Linkedin Banner