William Eichler Thursday, March 14, 2019

It’s ‘business as usual’ at Mersey bridge, council defiantly insists

Halton Borough Council has said it is ‘business as usual’ at the Mersey Gateway despite a tribunal decision that the bridge’s crossing charge is 'not a tolling scheme’.

A Traffic Penalty Tribunal appeal ruling has said that drivers pay a ‘road user charge’ at the Mersey Gateway and not a toll as the council argues. The two are legally different.

The appeal was brought by Scrap Mersey Tolls (SMT) campaigner Damian Curzon who argued there were errors in the wording of two penalty charge notices he received for failing to pay the £2 crossing charge on 15 June 2018.

The tribunal adjudicator M. F. Kennedy concluded that the scheme is a road user charging scheme, not a toll, and the use of the word ‘toll’ on the penalty charge notice was a ‘procedural impropriety’.

The sign on the bridge in question is authorised for a tolling scheme only, Mr Kennedy said.

Halton BC also failed to consider Mr Curzon’s representations, Mr Kennedy added, which amounts to another ‘procedural impropriety’.

The fact that the council did not respond to the representations within 56 days means they have been accepted by the authority and the charge should be dropped.

Responding to the decision, a spokesperson for Halton BC said: ‘Adjudication by the Traffic Penalty Tribunal (TPT) cannot and does not, in law, invalidate or remove the powers in place from the 14 October 2017 to administer and enforce tolls on the Mersey Gateway Bridge.’

The TPT’s decision ‘does not have general effect nor carry any weight as precedent,’ the spokesperson continued.

‘Any suggestion that the council has no power to charge or enforce how it does this or that the council is acting inappropriately or “illegally” is misleading, inaccurate and wrong in law,’ they added.

Furthermore, they challenged the Tribunal’s comments with regards to the bridge sign.

‘The Adjudicator’s decision in respect of signage contradicts the decision of the Adjudicator in the early case where the Adjudicator concluded signage is “large, well sited, in clear view, and to communicate to a driver unfamiliar with the area that a payment was required and how to pay.”’

‘It’s business as usual at the Mersey Gateway – please continue to pay to use Mersey Gateway,’ the spokesperson concluded.

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Pensions Officer (Benefits)

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£37,602- £45,564 per year (starting salary depen
Job Title
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Development Management Team Manager

North Yorkshire Council
£51,356 - £55,539
Lead one of the largest planning services in the country! Selby, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: North Yorkshire Council

Development Management Team Manager

North Yorkshire Council
£51,356 - £55,539
Lead one of the largest planning services in the country! Northallerton, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: North Yorkshire Council

Social Worker - Children with Disabilities Team, Mid Essex

Essex County Council
£38487.0000 - £51834.0000 per annum
Social Worker - Children with Disabilities Team, Mid EssexFixed Term, Full Time£38,487 to £51,834 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

RCHW Site Operative

Essex County Council
Up to £25959.00 per annum
RCHW Site OperativePermanent, Part Time£25,959 per annum full time equivalent Location
Recuriter: Essex County Council
Linkedin Banner