William Eichler 27 September 2018

Health and care inspection regime leaves ‘room for improvement’

Health and care inspection regime leaves ‘room for improvement’ image

The new inspection regime for assessing the performance of health and care services is a ‘significant improvement’ on the system it replaced, but there is room for improvement, a landmark report has concluded.

In 2013 the Care Quality Commission (CQC) adopted an ‘Ofsted-style’ inspection and rating regime for evaluating hospitals, care services, general practices and other organisations operating in the health and care sector.

The new regime was part of the Government’s response to the Francis report into the failures of care at Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust that contributed to the deaths of between 400 and 1,200 patients between January 2005 and March 2009 at Stafford hospital.

Today’s report, published by The King’s Fund and Alliance Manchester Business School, is the first major evaluation of the new inspection regime since it was introduced.

Funded by the National Institute for Health Research, the report examined how the regime was working in four sectors — acute hospitals, mental health, general practice and social care – in six areas of England between 2015 and 2018.

The new approach, it concluded, was a ‘significant improvement’ on the system it replaced.

It found that the impact of the inspection regime came about through the interactions between providers, CQC and other stakeholders — not just from an individual inspection visit and report.

These relationships are ‘critical’, it suggested, with mutual credibility, respect and trust being ‘very important’.

The report argued that CQC should invest more in the recruitment and training of its workforce and it called on providers to encourage and support their staff to engage openly with inspection teams.

Despite the improvements, however, the report warned the focus on inspection and rating may have crowded out other activity which might have more impact.

It recommended that CQC focus less on large, intensive but infrequent inspections and more on regular, less formal contact with providers, helping to drive improvement before, during and after inspections.

The evaluation also uncovered significant differences in how CQC’s inspection and ratings work across the four sectors it regulates.

Acute and mental health providers were more likely to have the capacity to improve and had better access to external improvement support than general practice and social care providers.

The report recommended that CQC develop the inspection model in different ways for different sectors, taking into account these differences in capability and support.

The researchers also analysed data on A&E, maternity and GP services to see if CQC inspection and rating had an impact on key performance indicators but found only small effects.

The ‘risk-based’ system using routine performance data which CQC used to target inspections was found to have little connection to subsequent ratings. The report suggested the CQC use a wider range of up-to-date data to develop a more insightful way of prioritising inspections.

‘Over the past few years, the CQC has completed a herculean task by inspecting and rating every hospital, general practice and adult social care provider in England,’ said Ruth Robertson, report author and senior fellow at The King’s Fund.

‘Although we heard general support for their new approach, we also uncovered frustrations with the process, some unintended consequences and clear room for improvement.

‘We found that CQC’s approach works in different ways in different parts of the health and care system. When CQC identifies a problem in a large hospital there is a team of people who can help the organisation respond, but for a small GP surgery or care home the situation is very different.

‘We recommend that CQC develops its approach in different ways in different parts of the health system with a focus on how it can have the biggest impact on quality.’

Kieran Walshe, report author and professor of health policy and management at Alliance Manchester Business School, the University of Manchester, welcomed the fact that CQC had already taken some of the report’s findings into account.

‘Fundamentally, the purpose of regulation is to drive improvement – not just in poorly performing providers but across the board,’ Professor Walshe continued.

‘CQC can now build on its experience and database from the first full cycle of inspection and rating, to create a more targeted and responsive regulatory model’

'But CQC cannot do this alone. It is just as much up to health and social care providers, and other stakeholders like NHS England and NHS Improvement, to make regulation work in improving services for patients.’

Learning from Leeds image

Learning from Leeds

Joanne Volpe the best of giving people the information they need to find a home right for them.
Highways jobs

Senior Practitioner - Placement Finding Team

Essex County Council
£28500.0 - £50400.0 per annum
Senior Practitioner - Children and Young People Placement Service- Placement Finding Team Interviews to be held on the 10th September at County Hall, England, Essex, Chelmsford
Recuriter: Essex County Council

People Information Analyst

Essex County Council
Up to £33330 per annum
Please note this is a fixed term contract role for a duration of 12 months. Essex County Council (ECC) is one of the largest and most dynamic local au England, Essex, Chelmsford
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Key stage Officer

Royal Borough of Greenwich
£32430 - £34794
Key Stage Education Officer (Secondary Phase) to work with children in our care, supporting them in classrooms and in their homes with their education SE18 6HQ
Recuriter: Royal Borough of Greenwich

Solicitor/Barrister Advocate - Children’s x4

Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council
Band I, SCP 44 - 47 (£46,564 - £49,538 per annum) (£24.14 - 25.68 per hour)
To act as the principal advocate for all aspects of advocacy legal work relating to the children’s social care in the county court and high court. Sandwell Council House, Freeth Street, Oldbury B69 3DE
Recuriter: Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council

Business Support Officer

Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council
Band C, SCP 5 - 8 (£18,795 - £19,945 per annum) pro rata (£9.74 - £10.34 per hour)
The successful candidate will provide administrative business support to service teams within Adult Social Care, Health and Wellbeing. The Lyng, Health & Social Care Centre, Frank Fisher Way, West Bromwich, B70 7AW
Recuriter: Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council

Local Government News

Latest issue - Local Goverrnemnt News

The June issue of Local Government News contains the full details of all the winning schemes in the 2019 Street Design Awards. From Children's Play to Pedestrian Environment, find out who has been recognised for their innovation and use of best practice.

This issue also explores how local government pension funds can hedge currency risk, how councils can best address the shortfall in school places, and an update on the number of authorities banning the use of Roundup over safety fears.

Register for your free magazine