Dan Peters 28 March 2017

Hammersmith & Fulham blamed for collapse of tri-borough arrangement

Hammersmith & Fulham blamed for collapse of tri-borough arrangement image

Two members of the tri-borough have blamed Hammersmith & Fulham LBC after they ‘reluctantly decided’ to serve notice on ending the arrangement.

Westminster City Council and Kensington & Chelsea RLBC last night said their partner had been ‘appearing to make alternative in-house plans without any formal engagement’.

The two councils said this was ‘causing anxiety to shared staff and potential risks to the joint services for vulnerable people in each borough’ but they added both boroughs remained ‘absolutely determined to continue to work together for the benefit of local people’.

They have now ‘formally agreed to give notice to terminate the shared staffing arrangements’ covering children’s services, adult social care and public health.

Westminster leader, Cllr Nickie Aiken, said: ‘When it was established in 2011 it was quite rightly lauded as an innovation in local authority service delivery.

‘With extremely talented and hardworking staff, its track record speaks for itself with successes in children’s services, school attainment results and youth offending services, to name but a few, combined with £43m of estimated savings.

‘We would not have chosen to end the tri-borough arrangements, which we believe have been a great success.

‘However, both the leader of Kensington & Chelsea and I feel we are unable to continue with tri-borough when we have a partner that we do not believe is committed to it as we are and appears to be making their own plans to leave, without any formal discussions.

‘We can’t have that uncertainty for staff and these vital services, which is why, with much regret, we have very reluctantly taken the decision to terminate the joint arrangements for children’s services, adult social care and public health.

‘We are confident that the future remains stable and positive for the continued sharing of services between Westminster and Kensington & Chelsea, and our door remains firmly open should Hammersmith & Fulham wish to come to discuss a review of the current arrangements and find alternative ways of working together.’

Earlier this month, a well-placed source suggested the announcement of the departure of Hammersmith & Fulham chief executive Nigel Pallace was ‘part of ending the tri-borough’ but this was denied by the council at the time.

Kim Dero, director of delivery at Hammersmith & Fulham is due to take over from Mr Pallace on an interim basis at the end of this month.

When it was launched, London’s tri-borough project was heralded as a ‘highly ambitious programme for shared services with important lessons for other councils’.

Responding to the news, Hammersmith & Fulham Council leader Stephen Cowan said: 'We’ve had concerns for some time about the value of the ‘tri-borough’, its lack of transparency and its built-in conflicts of interest.

'In our last two budgets, Hammersmith & Fulham Council found £31m in savings but the ‘tri-borough’ contributed no more than £200,000 of that, less than 1%.

'Problems with ‘tri-borough’ contracts, procured by Westminster City Council, have cost Hammersmith & Fulham over £5m, including the botched contract for special needs transport that put our disabled children at risk.

'And senior ‘tri-borough’ officers have had to balance Hammersmith & Fulham’s determination to keep Charing Cross Hospital open with Westminster and Kensington and Chelsea’s support for closing it.'

'Triggering withdrawal is evidently a long-planned move by the two councils. I look forward to having sensible discussions with them about how we can all move on in the best way for our residents,' he added.

The Brownfield Land Release Fund image

The Brownfield Land Release Fund

To what extent does this early initiative of the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities deliver on the ‘levelling up’ agenda? Lawrence Turner reports.
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Chief Finance Officer

Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council
£91,209 per annum
You will join a high performing, thriving Council, which developing next practice in health and care integration and playing a lead role in... Calderdale, West Yorkshire
Recuriter: Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council

Commercial Customer Manager

North Yorkshire County Council
£39,880 to £43,857
Are you someone who is innovative and has the drive to increase revenue for the Council whilst ensuring excellent service provision to our customers? Northallerton, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: North Yorkshire County Council

Social Care Lead Officer

Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council
£35,745 - £40,876 pro rata per annum
A vacancy has become available for a part time Social Care Lead Officer, to cover in... Sandwell, West Midlands
Recuriter: Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council

Communications & Corporate Affairs Manager

Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council
£47,845 - £50,900 per annum
To apply for this role please upload your most recent CV that sets out your relevant experience against the job description. Sandwell, West Midlands
Recuriter: Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council

Career Grade Planning Officer

Royal Borough of Greenwich
£27978 - £37722 per annum + n/a
Career Grade Planning Officer - West Area and East Area Team The Royal Borough of Greenwich continues to faces an unprecedented growth agenda in terms England, London
Recuriter: Royal Borough of Greenwich

Public Property

Latest issue - Public Property News

This issue of Public Property examines how how flexible workspaces can lead the way in regeneration for local authorities, Why local authority intervention is key to successful urban regeneration schemes and if the Government’s challenge of embracing beauty is an opportunity for communities.

The March issue also takes a closer look at Blackburn with Darwen Council's first digital health hub to help people gain control over health and care services.

Register for your free digital issue