William Eichler 02 June 2017

Enforcement regime on displaying agent fees ‘failing’, survey reveals

The enforcement regime on displaying agent fees is ‘failing’, says licensing group as survey reveals the majority of councils are not issuing penalties for non-compliance.

In 2015, it was made law for agents to display their fees. However, a survey of 42 local authorities by the National Approved Letting Scheme (NALS) found 93% had failed to issue a single financial penalty to letting agents for non-compliance.

The survey, based on Freedom of Information requests, revealed only three penalty notices have been served for failure to display all relevant landlord and tenant fees, and of these, only one has been paid in full.

NALS concluded the the lack of notices served by councils raises ‘clear concerns’ that the level of penalty may not be right to cover the cost of enforcement. Currently, the maximum penalty is £5,000.

The Government has said the private rented sector is a high priority. However, this does not appear to be the case for councils where most (59%) admitted they do not consider the display of letting agent fees represents a high priority for the allocation of resources within Trading Standards.

Almost half of local authorities (45%) said they only undertake reactive enforcement activity. A third (33%) allocated no staffing resources to this work in 2016/17, while 62% of councils anticipate no changes in the level of staffing resources in 2017/18.

Nearly two thirds of local authorities (64%) also revealed they haven’t yet assessed the likely impact on enforcement when the Government introduces a ban on letting fees to tenants.

‘We’re clearly concerned by these results and the disconnect between Government’s aspirations with consumer protection legislation and the reality of delivery through enforcement,’ said Isobel Thomson, chief executive of NALS.

‘We recognise trading standards teams are underfunded and under-resourced, but if local authorities aren’t enforcing the current legislation what will make things different when the fee ban is implemented?

‘Without sufficient robust and coherent enforcement action, we will never stop the criminal element in the PRS. They will continue to operate knowing they won’t face any penalty and it’s the consumer who will continue to suffer.

‘We believe now is the time to start a constructive dialogue with the Chartered Trading Standards Institute and its members on how we can work together to stamp out the rogues.’

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

History Service Manager

Oxfordshire County Council
50269 - 53460
About Us Oxfordshire History Service is responsible for archive and local studies provision for the county of Oxfordshire. The service collects, preserves, promotes, and makes accessible the written and pictorial heritage of Oxfordshire for researchers w Oxfordshire
Recuriter: Oxfordshire County Council

Design & Projects Manager

Bath & North East Somerset Council
Grade 12 £59,568 - £66,801 per annum
We’re committed to sustainability, smart infrastructure, and improving people’s lives. Bath, Somerset
Recuriter: Bath & North East Somerset Council

Senior Legal Officer (Qualified Childcare Solicitor/Lawyer) (CDC)

City Of Doncaster Council
Grade 10, £47,154 - £51,235
The successful applicant will have good communication skills and be able to manage their time effectively and efficiently. Doncaster, South Yorkshire
Recuriter: City Of Doncaster Council

Senior Legal Officer - Property (CDC)

City Of Doncaster Council
Grade 10, £47,154 - £51,235 (depending upon knowledge and experience)
We are looking to appoint an experienced Solicitor, Barrister or FCILEX to our team Doncaster, South Yorkshire
Recuriter: City Of Doncaster Council

Human Resources Administrator

Wyre Borough Council
£25,989 - £26,403
Are you organised, customer-focused, and passionate about supporting people and processes? Poulton-Le-Fylde, Lancashire
Recuriter: Wyre Borough Council
Linkedin Banner