William Eichler 02 June 2017

Enforcement regime on displaying agent fees ‘failing’, survey reveals

The enforcement regime on displaying agent fees is ‘failing’, says licensing group as survey reveals the majority of councils are not issuing penalties for non-compliance.

In 2015, it was made law for agents to display their fees. However, a survey of 42 local authorities by the National Approved Letting Scheme (NALS) found 93% had failed to issue a single financial penalty to letting agents for non-compliance.

The survey, based on Freedom of Information requests, revealed only three penalty notices have been served for failure to display all relevant landlord and tenant fees, and of these, only one has been paid in full.

NALS concluded the the lack of notices served by councils raises ‘clear concerns’ that the level of penalty may not be right to cover the cost of enforcement. Currently, the maximum penalty is £5,000.

The Government has said the private rented sector is a high priority. However, this does not appear to be the case for councils where most (59%) admitted they do not consider the display of letting agent fees represents a high priority for the allocation of resources within Trading Standards.

Almost half of local authorities (45%) said they only undertake reactive enforcement activity. A third (33%) allocated no staffing resources to this work in 2016/17, while 62% of councils anticipate no changes in the level of staffing resources in 2017/18.

Nearly two thirds of local authorities (64%) also revealed they haven’t yet assessed the likely impact on enforcement when the Government introduces a ban on letting fees to tenants.

‘We’re clearly concerned by these results and the disconnect between Government’s aspirations with consumer protection legislation and the reality of delivery through enforcement,’ said Isobel Thomson, chief executive of NALS.

‘We recognise trading standards teams are underfunded and under-resourced, but if local authorities aren’t enforcing the current legislation what will make things different when the fee ban is implemented?

‘Without sufficient robust and coherent enforcement action, we will never stop the criminal element in the PRS. They will continue to operate knowing they won’t face any penalty and it’s the consumer who will continue to suffer.

‘We believe now is the time to start a constructive dialogue with the Chartered Trading Standards Institute and its members on how we can work together to stamp out the rogues.’

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Senior Structural Engineer

The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council
Negotiable
Apply your structural expertise to protect the safety of our borough's buildings and communities England, London
Recuriter: The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council

Assistant Building Control Surveyor

The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council
Negotiable
Build your expertise in a borough where safety, sustainability and technical excellence matter England, London
Recuriter: The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council

Minibus Driver

North Yorkshire Council
£25,620 - £25,989 pro rata per annum
You will be responsible for the safety of passengers during these journeys and will ensure that the passengers board Selby, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: North Yorkshire Council

Operations Assistant

North Yorkshire Council
£25,989 - £27,254 per annum
The transport provided enables people to access day centres, learning opportunities, supported employment Selby, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: North Yorkshire Council

Medical Passenger Assistant

North Yorkshire Council
£27,254 - £29,064 pro rata
Are you the kind of person who naturally looks out for others and loves working as part of a community? Selby, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: North Yorkshire Council
Linkedin Banner