William Eichler 02 June 2017

Enforcement regime on displaying agent fees ‘failing’, survey reveals

The enforcement regime on displaying agent fees is ‘failing’, says licensing group as survey reveals the majority of councils are not issuing penalties for non-compliance.

In 2015, it was made law for agents to display their fees. However, a survey of 42 local authorities by the National Approved Letting Scheme (NALS) found 93% had failed to issue a single financial penalty to letting agents for non-compliance.

The survey, based on Freedom of Information requests, revealed only three penalty notices have been served for failure to display all relevant landlord and tenant fees, and of these, only one has been paid in full.

NALS concluded the the lack of notices served by councils raises ‘clear concerns’ that the level of penalty may not be right to cover the cost of enforcement. Currently, the maximum penalty is £5,000.

The Government has said the private rented sector is a high priority. However, this does not appear to be the case for councils where most (59%) admitted they do not consider the display of letting agent fees represents a high priority for the allocation of resources within Trading Standards.

Almost half of local authorities (45%) said they only undertake reactive enforcement activity. A third (33%) allocated no staffing resources to this work in 2016/17, while 62% of councils anticipate no changes in the level of staffing resources in 2017/18.

Nearly two thirds of local authorities (64%) also revealed they haven’t yet assessed the likely impact on enforcement when the Government introduces a ban on letting fees to tenants.

‘We’re clearly concerned by these results and the disconnect between Government’s aspirations with consumer protection legislation and the reality of delivery through enforcement,’ said Isobel Thomson, chief executive of NALS.

‘We recognise trading standards teams are underfunded and under-resourced, but if local authorities aren’t enforcing the current legislation what will make things different when the fee ban is implemented?

‘Without sufficient robust and coherent enforcement action, we will never stop the criminal element in the PRS. They will continue to operate knowing they won’t face any penalty and it’s the consumer who will continue to suffer.

‘We believe now is the time to start a constructive dialogue with the Chartered Trading Standards Institute and its members on how we can work together to stamp out the rogues.’

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Digital Support Analyst (Field Engineer) - ACL

Essex County Council
£30685.00 - £36099.00 per annum + +26 Days Leave & Local Gov Pension
Digital Support Analyst (Field Engineer) - Adult Community LearningPermanent, Full Time£30,685 to £36,099 Per AnnumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

HGV & Municipal Vehicle Technician

Ribble Valley Borough Council
Scale 5 (scp 16-19) £30,518 to £32,061 per annum
This post assists the Senior HGV and Municipal Vehicle Technician in ensuring that the Council’s vehicle fleet is maintained to a high standard. Clitheroe, Lancashire
Recuriter: Ribble Valley Borough Council

Data Performance Analyst

The Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead
£39,526 - £43,613 per annum
We have an exciting opportunity for a Data Performance Analyst to join us! Maidenhead, Berkshire
Recuriter: The Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead

Building Control Surveyor

North Yorkshire Council
Circa up to £46k* + 10% Recruitment Payment
Shape Safer, Smarter Buildings Across North Yorkshire Selby, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: North Yorkshire Council

Building Control Surveyor

North Yorkshire Council
Circa up to £46k* + 10% Recruitment Payment
Shape Safer, Smarter Buildings Across North Yorkshire Northallerton, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: North Yorkshire Council
Linkedin Banner