William Eichler 02 June 2017

Enforcement regime on displaying agent fees ‘failing’, survey reveals

The enforcement regime on displaying agent fees is ‘failing’, says licensing group as survey reveals the majority of councils are not issuing penalties for non-compliance.

In 2015, it was made law for agents to display their fees. However, a survey of 42 local authorities by the National Approved Letting Scheme (NALS) found 93% had failed to issue a single financial penalty to letting agents for non-compliance.

The survey, based on Freedom of Information requests, revealed only three penalty notices have been served for failure to display all relevant landlord and tenant fees, and of these, only one has been paid in full.

NALS concluded the the lack of notices served by councils raises ‘clear concerns’ that the level of penalty may not be right to cover the cost of enforcement. Currently, the maximum penalty is £5,000.

The Government has said the private rented sector is a high priority. However, this does not appear to be the case for councils where most (59%) admitted they do not consider the display of letting agent fees represents a high priority for the allocation of resources within Trading Standards.

Almost half of local authorities (45%) said they only undertake reactive enforcement activity. A third (33%) allocated no staffing resources to this work in 2016/17, while 62% of councils anticipate no changes in the level of staffing resources in 2017/18.

Nearly two thirds of local authorities (64%) also revealed they haven’t yet assessed the likely impact on enforcement when the Government introduces a ban on letting fees to tenants.

‘We’re clearly concerned by these results and the disconnect between Government’s aspirations with consumer protection legislation and the reality of delivery through enforcement,’ said Isobel Thomson, chief executive of NALS.

‘We recognise trading standards teams are underfunded and under-resourced, but if local authorities aren’t enforcing the current legislation what will make things different when the fee ban is implemented?

‘Without sufficient robust and coherent enforcement action, we will never stop the criminal element in the PRS. They will continue to operate knowing they won’t face any penalty and it’s the consumer who will continue to suffer.

‘We believe now is the time to start a constructive dialogue with the Chartered Trading Standards Institute and its members on how we can work together to stamp out the rogues.’

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Lunchtime Play Worker

Durham County Council
£24,796 pro rata
Lunchtime Play Worker  Grade 1,  £24,796 pro rata  Part Time - 6.25 hour per week, Monday – Friday
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Community Support Worker - Centralised Safeguarding Triage

Essex County Council
£25395.00 - £32131.00 per annum + + 26 Days Leave & Local Gov Pension
Community Support Worker - Centralised Safeguarding TriageFixed Term, Full Time£25,395 to £32,131 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Senior Applications Developer

Essex County Council
Up to £500.0000 per day
Senior Applications Developer Contract
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Project Manager (Major and Strategic Development) - WMF2479e

Westmorland and Furness Council
£45,091 - £46,142
This is an exciting opportunity to work within the Thriving Places Directorate within the Sustainable Transport Team. Cumbria / Various
Recuriter: Westmorland and Furness Council

Residential Night Support Worker - WMF2480e

Westmorland and Furness Council
£34,434 - £35,412 pro rata
We’re looking for Waking Night Support Workers to join our dedicated team at 23 Hart Street. Ulverston, Cumbria
Recuriter: Westmorland and Furness Council
Linkedin Banner