William Eichler 02 June 2017

Enforcement regime on displaying agent fees ‘failing’, survey reveals

The enforcement regime on displaying agent fees is ‘failing’, says licensing group as survey reveals the majority of councils are not issuing penalties for non-compliance.

In 2015, it was made law for agents to display their fees. However, a survey of 42 local authorities by the National Approved Letting Scheme (NALS) found 93% had failed to issue a single financial penalty to letting agents for non-compliance.

The survey, based on Freedom of Information requests, revealed only three penalty notices have been served for failure to display all relevant landlord and tenant fees, and of these, only one has been paid in full.

NALS concluded the the lack of notices served by councils raises ‘clear concerns’ that the level of penalty may not be right to cover the cost of enforcement. Currently, the maximum penalty is £5,000.

The Government has said the private rented sector is a high priority. However, this does not appear to be the case for councils where most (59%) admitted they do not consider the display of letting agent fees represents a high priority for the allocation of resources within Trading Standards.

Almost half of local authorities (45%) said they only undertake reactive enforcement activity. A third (33%) allocated no staffing resources to this work in 2016/17, while 62% of councils anticipate no changes in the level of staffing resources in 2017/18.

Nearly two thirds of local authorities (64%) also revealed they haven’t yet assessed the likely impact on enforcement when the Government introduces a ban on letting fees to tenants.

‘We’re clearly concerned by these results and the disconnect between Government’s aspirations with consumer protection legislation and the reality of delivery through enforcement,’ said Isobel Thomson, chief executive of NALS.

‘We recognise trading standards teams are underfunded and under-resourced, but if local authorities aren’t enforcing the current legislation what will make things different when the fee ban is implemented?

‘Without sufficient robust and coherent enforcement action, we will never stop the criminal element in the PRS. They will continue to operate knowing they won’t face any penalty and it’s the consumer who will continue to suffer.

‘We believe now is the time to start a constructive dialogue with the Chartered Trading Standards Institute and its members on how we can work together to stamp out the rogues.’

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Senior Health and Safety Risk Advisor

North Yorkshire Council
£42,839 - £47,181 per annum
Are you able to make sound, evidence‑based and proportionate health and safety decisions? Scarborough, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: North Yorkshire Council

Health and Safety Advisor

North Yorkshire Council
£34,434- £42,839
Are you someone who can support and mentor educational clients to make impactful health and safety related decisions? Wetherby, West Yorkshire
Recuriter: North Yorkshire Council

Learning Disability & Autism Transforming Care Case Manager

Essex County Council
£44952 - £52884 per annum + Hybrid Working
This is a part time position for 22.2 hours per week with flexibility to agree working pattern. The pro rata'd salary range is £26,971 to £31,730 per England, Essex, Chelmsford
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Assistant Director for Estate Strategy and Development  

Derbyshire County Council
£71,202 - £77,495 per annum
We are seeking an ambitious and strategic leader to join our senior management team as Assistant Director for Estate Strategy & Development. Matlock, Derbyshire
Recuriter: Derbyshire County Council

ESCA Development Assistant

Essex County Council
£25959.0000 - £27613.0000 per annum
ESCA Development AssistantFixed Term, Full Time£25,959 to £27,613 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council
Linkedin Banner