William Eichler 12 May 2016

Court upholds Whitehall’s affordable housing contributions plans

A court has ruled in favour of the Government’s small sites affordable housing contributions policy.

The policy was introduced in November 2014 and was designed to ensure the burden of affordable housing contributions did not fall on small-scale developers, and custom- and self-builders.

It created a national threshold of ten units or fewer beneath which affordable housing contributions should not be sought.

West Berkshire District and Reading Borough councils brought legal proceedings against the Government to challenge the policy, but the Court of Appeal ruled against them.

Housing minister Brandon Lewis, who described the court case as ‘a total waste of taxpayers’ money’, welcomed the decision.

Mr Lewis said: ‘We’re committed to building more homes, including record numbers of affordable homes – key to this is removing unnecessary red tape and bureaucracy that prevents builders getting on sites in the first place.

‘Today’s judgment by the Court of Appeal restores common sense to the system, and ensures that those builders developing smaller sites – including self-builders - don’t face costs that could stop them from building any homes at all.

‘This will now mean that builders developing sites of fewer than 10 homes will no longer have to make an affordable homes contribution that should instead fall to those building much larger developments.’

‘This case was a total waste of taxpayers’ money and the uncertainty the case created amongst housebuilders stalled new development from coming through,’ he added.

Responding to the court’s decision, a spokesperson for the councils said: ‘West Berkshire and Reading Council’s are naturally disappointed by this result.

‘We are reviewing this verdict and currently considering our options as a matter of priority with regard to appeal. Until such time as we have determined how we intend to proceed, it would not be appropriate to comment further.’

Skills Pipelines: What local government needs to know image

Skills Pipelines: What local government needs to know

Councils and mayors are to be handed a central role in developing skills pipelines for local industries, as the Government unveils what it calls a ‘fundamental change’ to the education system aimed at tackling youth unemployment. Here's what council leaders and officers need to know.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

SEND Participation Engagement Officer

The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council
£40,404
You’ll also represent young people’s perspectives at service level meetings and champion robust safeguarding practices London (Greater)
Recuriter: The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council

Social Worker, Young People with Disabilities (16 - 25)

Essex County Council
£36124.0000 - £51834.0000 per annum
Social Worker, Young People with Disabilities (16 - 25) mid TeamPermanent, Full Time£36,124.00 to £51,834.00 Per Annum Location
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Head of Housing Management

Redbridge London Borough Council
£89,037 to £92,538
You’ll enhance our emphasis on quality assurance and getting things ‘right first time’ – making better use of technology in our approach London (Greater)
Recuriter: Redbridge London Borough Council

Head of Local Taxation

Redbridge London Borough Council
£79,119 - £82,368
This is a key leadership role in the Council, with responsibility for the effective and efficient collection of business rates and council tax London (Greater)
Recuriter: Redbridge London Borough Council

School Crossing Patrol Officer - Vacancies across Essex

Essex County Council
Up to £13.46 per hour
School Crossing Patrol Officer - Vacancies across EssexPermanent, Term Time£13.46 per hourLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council
Linkedin Banner