William Eichler 12 May 2016

Court upholds Whitehall’s affordable housing contributions plans

A court has ruled in favour of the Government’s small sites affordable housing contributions policy.

The policy was introduced in November 2014 and was designed to ensure the burden of affordable housing contributions did not fall on small-scale developers, and custom- and self-builders.

It created a national threshold of ten units or fewer beneath which affordable housing contributions should not be sought.

West Berkshire District and Reading Borough councils brought legal proceedings against the Government to challenge the policy, but the Court of Appeal ruled against them.

Housing minister Brandon Lewis, who described the court case as ‘a total waste of taxpayers’ money’, welcomed the decision.

Mr Lewis said: ‘We’re committed to building more homes, including record numbers of affordable homes – key to this is removing unnecessary red tape and bureaucracy that prevents builders getting on sites in the first place.

‘Today’s judgment by the Court of Appeal restores common sense to the system, and ensures that those builders developing smaller sites – including self-builders - don’t face costs that could stop them from building any homes at all.

‘This will now mean that builders developing sites of fewer than 10 homes will no longer have to make an affordable homes contribution that should instead fall to those building much larger developments.’

‘This case was a total waste of taxpayers’ money and the uncertainty the case created amongst housebuilders stalled new development from coming through,’ he added.

Responding to the court’s decision, a spokesperson for the councils said: ‘West Berkshire and Reading Council’s are naturally disappointed by this result.

‘We are reviewing this verdict and currently considering our options as a matter of priority with regard to appeal. Until such time as we have determined how we intend to proceed, it would not be appropriate to comment further.’

Skills Pipelines: What local government needs to know image

Skills Pipelines: What local government needs to know

Councils and mayors are to be handed a central role in developing skills pipelines for local industries, as the Government unveils what it calls a ‘fundamental change’ to the education system aimed at tackling youth unemployment. Here's what council leaders and officers need to know.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Senior Instructor - Essex Outdoors

Essex County Council
£26840.0000 - £31576.0000 per annum
Senior Instructor - Essex Outdoors Mersea and Essex Outdoors HarlowPermanent, Full Time£26,840 to £31,576 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Social Worker - Adolescent / Contextual Safeguarding Team

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
Up to £52,767 per annum
Social Worker - Adolescent / Contextual... Wandsworth
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Assistant Economic Development Officer

Ribble Valley Borough Council
Scale 4 (scp 10-13) £27,694 to £29,064 per annum
We're looking for a proactive, organised and enthusiastic Assistant Economic Development Officer to join our team. Clitheroe, Lancashire
Recuriter: Ribble Valley Borough Council

Senior Building Control Surveyor

Ribble Valley Borough Council
£42,839 to £46,142 per annum plus £8,000 market supplement for two years (£4,000 per annum)
The post holder will work in a picturesque rural Borough and help to ensure new buildings, alterations, installations Clitheroe, Lancashire
Recuriter: Ribble Valley Borough Council

Administration Assistant

Ribble Valley Borough Council
cale 3 (scp 7-8) £26,403 to £26,824 per annum
The main role of the post holder will be to carry out administrative work in connection with the Building Safety Levy Clitheroe, Lancashire
Recuriter: Ribble Valley Borough Council
Linkedin Banner