William Eichler 12 May 2016

Court upholds Whitehall’s affordable housing contributions plans

A court has ruled in favour of the Government’s small sites affordable housing contributions policy.

The policy was introduced in November 2014 and was designed to ensure the burden of affordable housing contributions did not fall on small-scale developers, and custom- and self-builders.

It created a national threshold of ten units or fewer beneath which affordable housing contributions should not be sought.

West Berkshire District and Reading Borough councils brought legal proceedings against the Government to challenge the policy, but the Court of Appeal ruled against them.

Housing minister Brandon Lewis, who described the court case as ‘a total waste of taxpayers’ money’, welcomed the decision.

Mr Lewis said: ‘We’re committed to building more homes, including record numbers of affordable homes – key to this is removing unnecessary red tape and bureaucracy that prevents builders getting on sites in the first place.

‘Today’s judgment by the Court of Appeal restores common sense to the system, and ensures that those builders developing smaller sites – including self-builders - don’t face costs that could stop them from building any homes at all.

‘This will now mean that builders developing sites of fewer than 10 homes will no longer have to make an affordable homes contribution that should instead fall to those building much larger developments.’

‘This case was a total waste of taxpayers’ money and the uncertainty the case created amongst housebuilders stalled new development from coming through,’ he added.

Responding to the court’s decision, a spokesperson for the councils said: ‘West Berkshire and Reading Council’s are naturally disappointed by this result.

‘We are reviewing this verdict and currently considering our options as a matter of priority with regard to appeal. Until such time as we have determined how we intend to proceed, it would not be appropriate to comment further.’

Skills Pipelines: What local government needs to know image

Skills Pipelines: What local government needs to know

Councils and mayors are to be handed a central role in developing skills pipelines for local industries, as the Government unveils what it calls a ‘fundamental change’ to the education system aimed at tackling youth unemployment. Here's what council leaders and officers need to know.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

ESCA Development Assistant

Essex County Council
£25959.0000 - £27613.0000 per annum
ESCA Development AssistantFixed Term, Full Time£25,959 to £27,613 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Tree Officer - North Herts Council

Essex County Council
£32653.0000 - £36773.0000 per annum
Essex County Council (ECC) are delighted to be advertising the Tree Officer role on before of North Herts Council. To apply for this position, please England, Hertfordshire, Letchworth Garden City
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Service Director - Education and Skills

Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council
£98, 135 - £113,630
A pivotal role at the heart of our improvement journey. Sandwell, West Midlands
Recuriter: Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council

Waste Minimisation Support Advisor

Essex County Council
Up to £14.020 per hour
Waste Minimisation Support Advisor - Braintree District Council Braintree, Essex Full-Time, Temporary 37 Hours per Week £14.02 PAYE / £17.95 Umbrella England, Essex, Braintree
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Service Director - Commissioning and Partnerships

Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council
£98, 135 - £113,630
A pivotal role at the centre of our ambitions for children, young people and families across Sandwell. Sandwell, West Midlands
Recuriter: Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council
Linkedin Banner