Austin Macauley 18 November 2014

Councils must learn from Rotherham exploitation scandal, say MPs

Local authorities across England have been urged to review their procedures in light of ‘systemic failures’ at Rotherham Council exposed by the town’s child sex abuse scandal.

Poor advice from officers and a lack of scrutiny by councillors were at the heart of weaknesses, according to a report by the communities and local government committee. It said the council’s child protection policies and plans were ‘never effectively checked’.

‘The circumstances found within Rotherham Council – policies divorced from reality, single party supremacy and a dominating personality with predominate influence – are likely to be found in other local authorities,’ it warned.

The committee also said the Jay Report into sexual exploitation in Rotherham had highlighted ‘serious flaws’ in the Ofsted inspection regime. MPs are to call the education watchdog in to face questions over its failure to protect children.

Committee chair Clive Betts said: ‘As a committee, we heard alarming evidence that the organised child sexual exploitation at Rotherham is prevalent across England. Rotherham is not an outlier.

‘It’s important to note that it was the press which stimulated action in Rotherham, not the council’s own system of challenge or scrutiny, nor external inspections. It’s vital local authorities across the country now ensure their scrutiny, governance, and leadership is fit and ready to identify and combat child sexual exploitation in their communities.

‘Serious questions also need to be asked of Ofsted. Repeated Ofsted inspections in Rotherham failed to lift the lid on the council’s shameful inability to tackle child sexual exploitation. As a committee, we will want to question Ofsted about their inspection regime and ask why their inspections were so ineffective in Rotherham.’

MPs said it was right that senior officers and the leader at Rotherham Council left their posts following the scandal.

‘It is an important matter of public policy that senior council staff be held accountable for their actions,’ said Mr Betts.

‘Arrangements should be put in place to bring to account not just council officers still in post but those who have moved on from an authority before serious questions about their performance emerge.’

Visit The MJ for further information on sexual exploitation in Rotherham.

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Social Care Assessor – Hospital Discharge Team

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£32,841 - £45,564
Social Care Assessor – Hospital Disch... Teddington, Greater London
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Residential Worker

Essex County Council
£25395.00 - £32131.00 per annum + pension
Residential WorkerPermanent, Full Time£25,395 to £32,131 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Deputy Chief Accountant

Oxfordshire County Council
50269 - 53460
As Deputy Chief Accountant, you will support the Chief Accountant in maintaining and improving the council’s financial accounting systems and ensuring accurate, timely statutory reporting. You will coordinate the preparation of the annual Statement of A Oxford
Recuriter: Oxfordshire County Council

Sector Growth & Skills Lead

Essex County Council
£44434.0000 - £52275.0000 per annum
Sector Growth & Skills LeadFixed Term, Full Time£44,434 to £52,275 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Head of Housing Enabling and Development

Sutton London Borough Council
£77,550 - £97,103
We are proud of our strong local identity, vibrant neighbourhoods and commitment to delivering services that make a real difference. Sutton, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Sutton London Borough Council
Linkedin Banner