William Eichler 18 May 2021

Council criticised for handling of COVID-19 business support

Council criticised for handling of COVID-19 business support  image

A north Yorkshire district council has defended itself after criticisms that there was a lack of transparency in the way it administered the discretionary grant scheme designed to help businesses impacted by COVID-19.

Two small business owners in the Craven District Council area contacted the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman to complain about the way the council handled their applications for support during the pandemic.

In March and May 2020, the Government introduced grant schemes to support businesses impacted by the pandemic. Businesses who qualified under these schemes could receive grants of £25,000, £10,000 or any sum under £10,000.

A man in the Craven area who runs a small business from a shared office was awarded a grant of £1,000, later increased to £2,000 on appeal. A second man, who runs a business from his home, was awarded £2,000. He appealed but was unsuccessful.

Ombudsman Michael King investigated these two cases and concluded that there was a lack of transparency with the way the council recorded how it decided the level of grants businesses would receive.

Mr King said that the council had decided it would favour some sectors over others without publishing this information, and had given more weight to the business sector than it did to the size of the business or their costs and losses despite saying these were key deciding factors.

‘We have carefully considered how the council had to react quickly to new challenges in preparing its COVID support scheme last year, but have decided it still failed to administer it properly,’ Mr King said.

‘We published guidance to councils on good administrative practice during the pandemic, and advised them that those basic principles of openness and transparency should remain the bedrock of councils’ work regardless of the external pressures they are under.’

Cllr Richard Foster, leader of Craven District Council, said that the council was ‘very disappointed’ by the Ombudsman’s findings.

‘Due to the pandemic, councils were required to deliver payments as quickly as possible. The Government made it very clear that speed was of the utmost importance,’ he said.

‘The council did publish information on its website that explained how claims would be considered against the criteria specified in the scheme, taking into account business size, relatively high property costs and reduced income.

‘We do not accept that we made any payments which were in direct contradiction of our scheme. We also do not accept that there was a lack of record keeping – in fact we had a significant amount of paperwork relating to each application and realistically we could not provide every document for every application to the Ombudsman.

‘Like every other council in the country, we were given a fixed allocation of funds and we had an unknown number of potential applicants; therefore it was impossible to advertise in advance the exact amount of grant each business might receive. However, we did show clearly within the local scheme the maximum amounts each category of business might expect to receive.’

He continued: ‘Our local approach, supported by local business groups, was to maximise awards as much as possible over as many businesses as possible, within the criteria and priorities defined nationally.

‘Our intention was to get as much money out as quickly and fairly as possible. This approach paid off as we paid out 99% of our discretionary funding, above the nationwide average (95%). This directly benefited our community and businesses, and therefore met the Government’s primary objective – something that this decision does not recognise.’

Skate parks are not the only fruit image

Skate parks are not the only fruit

On Go Skateboarding Day, Susannah Walker asks councils and their leisure and park departments to think differently about what facilities they provide for teenagers.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Interim Head of Fostering

Tile Hill
Negotiable day rate
We are working with a local authority client in London who is looking for an Interim Head of Fostering, the local authority was last inspected as “... London (Central), London (Greater)
Recuriter: Tile Hill

Interim Head of Children in Care and Care Leavers

Tile Hill
Negotiable day rate
We are working with a local authority client in London who is looking for an Interim Head of Children in Care and Care Leavers, the local authority... London (Central), London (Greater)
Recuriter: Tile Hill

Head of Regeneration and Economy

City of York Council
£59,593 - £68,094
York is a wonderful place to live and work and it is quite rightly famous across the globe. York, North Yorkshire / Hybrid
Recuriter: City of York Council

Clinical Lead, North Essex

Essex County Council
Negotiable
Clinical Lead, North EssexPermanent, Full TimeUp to £57,869 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Assistant Director Legal,&Governance/Monitoring Officer

Rochdale BC
£70,340 - £81,589
The Assistant Director role has breadth of responsibility beyond legal services incorporating Constitutional and Democratic Services Rochdale, Greater Manchester
Recuriter: Rochdale BC

Partner Content

Circular highways is a necessity not an aspiration – and it’s within our grasp

Shell is helping power the journey towards a circular paving industry with Shell Bitumen LT R, a new product for roads that uses plastics destined for landfill as part of the additives to make the bitumen.

Support from Effective Energy Group for Local Authorities to Deliver £430m Sustainable Warmth Funded Energy Efficiency Projects

Effective Energy Group is now offering its support to the 40 Local Authorities who have received a share of the £430m to deliver their projects on the ground by surveying properties and installing measures.

Pay.UK – the next step in Bacs’ evolution

Dougie Belmore explains how one of the main interfaces between you and Bacs is about to change.