William Eichler 03 November 2017

Child sexual exploitation case reveals ‘missed opportunities’ to intervene

A serious case review into the sexual exploitation of nine teenage girls in Somerset has found there were ‘missed opportunities’ for earlier intervention by the council.

A police operation in 2015 led to the imprisonment of two men for rape and sexual assault against six victims aged between 14 and 15 and a seventh who was 18 which occurred between 2010 and 2014.

The Somerset Safeguarding Children Board (SSCB) Learning and Improvement subgroup began to investigate the offences after it was revealed the criteria for such a review was met by two of the victims.

The two children had suffered persistent sexual, physical and emotional abuse. They had also had several pregnancies most of which ended in miscarriage or termination. One resulted in a child.

The SSCB’s serious case review discovered there had been ‘missed opportunities’ for more effective earlier intervention.

It uncovered evidence in the records from 2010 and 2011 that two of the victims, who were 15 at the time, had an older ‘boyfriend’. The parents of one of the children told the SSCB they had raised concerns about this when their child was 13.

The council records also revealed allegations that the premises where the perpetrators worked was a location for men to have sex with under-age girls. ?

The review concluded the council did not intervene earlier partly because of local practice weaknesses at the time, which had been identified in the ‘inadequate’ Ofsted inspection rating in 2013.

The review also warned there were national and regional obstacles to good practice.

It said there was a ‘confused and confusing stance’ in national policy about adolescent sexual activity, which leaves professionals and managers struggling to recognise and distinguish between sexual abuse, sexual exploitation and underage sexual activity. ?

Skills Pipelines: What local government needs to know image

Skills Pipelines: What local government needs to know

Councils and mayors are to be handed a central role in developing skills pipelines for local industries, as the Government unveils what it calls a ‘fundamental change’ to the education system aimed at tackling youth unemployment. Here's what council leaders and officers need to know.
SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Caretaker

Durham County Council
£24,796 (Pro Rata)
Permanent Contract – Part Time - 32 Hours per week (6am – 9.15am 3pm – 5.45pm) Mon-Fri. Whole Time. Required to start 20th October 2026.   The Governo Consett
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Social Worker

Durham County Council
Grade 9 – Pre-Progression (£35,412-£39,152 per annum) / Grade 11 – Post Progression (£40,777-£45,091 per annum). Pay award pending.
We are seeking to recruit two temporary (six month) full-time (37 hours per week) Social Workers, to join our Adult Social Work Team at Derwentside Lo Durham
Recuriter: Durham County Council

Head of Finance - Children & Young People’s Service

Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council
£75,585 - £80,726 (pay award pending)
This is a great place to work for people who want to make a real difference. Riverside House, Rotherham, South Yorkshire
Recuriter: Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council

Head of Finance and Accountancy (Deputy S151 Officer)

Chesterfield Borough Council
£72,000 (inclusive of Market Supplement)
In this role, you will provide visible leadership and management across the Finance Service Chesterfield, Derbyshire
Recuriter: Chesterfield Borough Council

Director of Digital, HR & Customer Services

Chesterfield Borough Council
£97,017
Reporting directly to the Deputy Chief Executive, you will lead a diverse directorate, with responsibility for Human Resources Chesterfield, Derbyshire
Recuriter: Chesterfield Borough Council
Linkedin Banner