Chris Mahony 23 January 2019

Auditors bid to explain real cause of difference in councils' spend on kids

A nine-fold variation in spending on children’s social care could largely be down to ‘differences in characteristics’ between councils, according to a National Audit Office (NAO) study.

The NAO report found that around 44% of the spending variation between councils could be explained by local characteristics such as custom and practice, local market conditions and historical patterns of demand.

It suggested that deprivation might explain another 15% and national policy changes or ‘shocks’ – such as the high profile death of a child – 10%.

Geography was not found to be an influence.

Around a quarter of the variation was unaccounted for by the factors identified by the NAO study.

The NAO found no link between a council’s spending and its Ofsted rating, with spending by services rated ‘good’ ranging from £570 per head to nearly £5,000.

With the number of child protection assessments having surged by 77% in seven years and many children’s services departments grappling with overspends, head of the NAO, Amyas Morse, questioned whether the Government would be able to meet its 2022 target of ensuring all vulnerable children received good support regardless of where they live.

Sir Amyas said: ‘The Department [for Education] has started to build its understanding of variations in services but it should know more than it does.

'Even with this understanding, the department faces a tall order to achieve its goal within three years.’

The NAO report urged the department ‘to promptly improve’ its understanding of children’s social care.

Chair of the Local Government Association’s children and young people board, Cllr Anntoinette Bramble, said: ‘There is no right amount for councils to spend on children’s services and, as our own research has found, the majority of spend variation is due to wider economic or geographic circumstances largely outside their control.’

The Association of Directors of Children’s Services (ADCS) warned that cuts to preventive services have generated expensive spending downstream – despite the study finding no link between Sure Start closures and a rise in child protection cases.

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

Deputy Team Manager - Older Adults Mental Health

Essex County Council
£48205 - £57988 per annum + Flexible Working, Hybrid Working
Interviews will be held in person at Rowan House, Colchester on 6th May 2026.The TeamWe are a committed team working with adults aged 65 years plus a England, Essex, Colchester
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Adults Social Worker - Learning Disability & Autism

Essex County Council
£38487 - £51834 per annum + Flexible Working, Hybrid Working
This is a 12 month fixed term contract or secondment opportunity.We're an adult social care service that wants to see citizens of Essex have as much England, Essex, Chelmsford
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Caseworker (Pharmacy Liasion)

Middlesbrough Council
£31,022 - £32,597
We have an exciting role on offer within our Public Health service as a Caseworker (Pharmacy Liason). Middlesbrough, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: Middlesbrough Council

Carers and Co-production Practice Development Lead

Middlesbrough Council
£41,771 - £44,075
We have an exciting role on offer within our Quality and Practice team as a Carers and Co-production Practice Development Lead. Middlesbrough, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: Middlesbrough Council

Quality Improvement Officer - Apprentice Provision

Essex County Council
£30585.00 - £35982.00 per annum
Quality Improvement Officer - Apprentice ProvisionPermanent, Full Time£30,585 to £35,982 per annumLocation
Recuriter: Essex County Council
Linkedin Banner