Chris Mahony 23 January 2019

Auditors bid to explain real cause of difference in councils' spend on kids

A nine-fold variation in spending on children’s social care could largely be down to ‘differences in characteristics’ between councils, according to a National Audit Office (NAO) study.

The NAO report found that around 44% of the spending variation between councils could be explained by local characteristics such as custom and practice, local market conditions and historical patterns of demand.

It suggested that deprivation might explain another 15% and national policy changes or ‘shocks’ – such as the high profile death of a child – 10%.

Geography was not found to be an influence.

Around a quarter of the variation was unaccounted for by the factors identified by the NAO study.

The NAO found no link between a council’s spending and its Ofsted rating, with spending by services rated ‘good’ ranging from £570 per head to nearly £5,000.

With the number of child protection assessments having surged by 77% in seven years and many children’s services departments grappling with overspends, head of the NAO, Amyas Morse, questioned whether the Government would be able to meet its 2022 target of ensuring all vulnerable children received good support regardless of where they live.

Sir Amyas said: ‘The Department [for Education] has started to build its understanding of variations in services but it should know more than it does.

'Even with this understanding, the department faces a tall order to achieve its goal within three years.’

The NAO report urged the department ‘to promptly improve’ its understanding of children’s social care.

Chair of the Local Government Association’s children and young people board, Cllr Anntoinette Bramble, said: ‘There is no right amount for councils to spend on children’s services and, as our own research has found, the majority of spend variation is due to wider economic or geographic circumstances largely outside their control.’

The Association of Directors of Children’s Services (ADCS) warned that cuts to preventive services have generated expensive spending downstream – despite the study finding no link between Sure Start closures and a rise in child protection cases.

SIGN UP
For your free daily news bulletin
Highways jobs

IT Project Manager - Braintree District Council

Essex County Council
Up to £350.0000 per day
IT Project Manager - Braintree District Council Temporary, Part-Time 3 days per week 2-3 Months Contract Up to £350.00 Umbrella per day dependant on e England, Essex
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Service Manager - Schools and Governance

Oxfordshire County Council
£68,143 - £71,574
Together, we’re the moment makers Together, we’re shaping children’s education for the future. Every day, our colleagues are helping to transform the lives of the residents of Oxfordshire. Oxfordshire County Council is committed to deliv Oxford, County Hall
Recuriter: Oxfordshire County Council

Senior Infrastructure Engineer - Braintree District Council

Essex County Council
Up to £500.0000 per day
Senior Infrastructure Engineer - Braintree District Council Temporary, Part-Time 3 days per week 2-3 Months Contract £389.864 PAYE / £500 Umbrella dai England, Essex
Recuriter: Essex County Council

Associate Educational Psychologist

Oxfordshire County Council
£820 - £19680
Together, we’re the moment makers and we’re focused on making every day the best it can be for children, young people and their families. It’s not a job – it’s a passion and together, we’re shaping education for the future. Every day, our coll Didcot
Recuriter: Oxfordshire County Council

EHC Coordinator – SEN, Education Directorate

London Borough of Bromley
 BR10-11 (£38,633 – £42,608pa)
London Borough of Bromley Council is working hard to do things differently in SEND, to do things better than ever before.  The Civic Centre, Churchill Court, 2 Westmoreland Road, BR1 1AS
Recuriter: London Borough of Bromley
Linkedin Banner